From: Eryu Guan <guan@eryu.me>
To: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@kernel.org>
Cc: fstests <fstests@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: add test for cases when a dio write has to fallback to a buffered write
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 14:43:41 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YEsNnaCvFPWdbdjm@desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL3q7H5WrDkHwQBYGP-1XYY=9r1Vk0MD8HDsGsQJ9tZOxOY5aw@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 10:48:35AM +0000, Filipe Manana wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 3:24 PM Eryu Guan <guan@eryu.me> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Mar 07, 2021 at 03:07:43PM +0000, Filipe Manana wrote:
> > > On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 2:41 PM Eryu Guan <guan@eryu.me> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 05:01:18PM +0000, fdmanana@kernel.org wrote:
> > > > > From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > Test cases where a direct IO write, with O_DSYNC, can not be done and has
> > > > > to fallback to a buffered write.
> > > > >
> > > > > This is motivated by a regression that was introduced in kernel 5.10 by
> > > > > commit 0eb79294dbe328 ("btrfs: dio iomap DSYNC workaround")) and was
> > > > > fixed in kernel 5.11 by commit ecfdc08b8cc65d ("btrfs: remove dio iomap
> > > > > DSYNC workaround").
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
> > > >
> > > > Sorry for the late review..
> > > >
> > > > So this is supposed to fail with v5.10 kernel, right? But I got it
> > > > passed
> > >
> > > Because either you are testing with a patched 5.10.x kernel, or you
> > > don't have CONFIG_BTRFS_ASSERT=y in your config.
> > > The fix landed in 5.10.18:
> >
> > You're right, I don't have CONFIG_BTRFS_ASSERT=y. As the test dumps the
> > od output of the file content, so I thought the failure would be a data
> > corruption, and expected a od output diff failure.
>
> I see the test was not merged yet, do you expect me to update anything
> in the patch?
Sorry, it was lost in my to-review queue.. But I'd be great if you could
add more descriptions about the CONFIG_BTRFS_ASSERT and the compress
case either in commit log or in test description.
Thanks,
Eryu
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-12 6:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-11 17:01 [PATCH] btrfs: add test for cases when a dio write has to fallback to a buffered write fdmanana
2021-03-07 14:35 ` Eryu Guan
2021-03-07 15:07 ` Filipe Manana
2021-03-07 15:19 ` Eryu Guan
2021-03-10 10:48 ` Filipe Manana
2021-03-12 6:43 ` Eryu Guan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YEsNnaCvFPWdbdjm@desktop \
--to=guan@eryu.me \
--cc=fdmanana@kernel.org \
--cc=fdmanana@suse.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).