From: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
To: dsterba@suse.cz, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] btrfs: verity metadata orphan items
Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 11:08:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YJwZuTXDfObB6Nbi@zen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210512174827.GV7604@twin.jikos.cz>
On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 07:48:27PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
> On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 12:20:43PM -0700, Boris Burkov wrote:
> > +/*
> > + * Helper to manage the transaction for adding an orphan item.
> > + */
> > +static int add_orphan(struct btrfs_inode *inode)
>
> I wonder if this helper is useful, it's used only once and the code is
> not long. Simply wrapping btrfs_orphan_add into a transaction is short
> enough to be in btrfs_begin_enable_verity.
>
I agree that just the plain transaction logic is not a big deal, and I
couldn't figure out how to phrase the comment so I left it at that,
which is unhelpful.
With that said, I found that pulling it out into a helper function
significantly reduced the gross-ness of the error handling in the
callsites. Especially for del_orphan in end verity which tries to
handle failures deleting the orphans, which quickly got tangled up with
other errors in the function and the possible transaction errors.
Honestly, I was surprised just how much it helped, and couldn't really
figure out why. If a helper being really beneficial is abnormal, I can
try again to figure out a clean way to write the code with the
transaction in-line.
> > +{
> > + struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans;
> > + struct btrfs_root *root = inode->root;
> > + int ret = 0;
> > +
> > + trans = btrfs_start_transaction(root, 1);
> > + if (IS_ERR(trans)) {
> > + ret = PTR_ERR(trans);
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> > + ret = btrfs_orphan_add(trans, inode);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret);
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> > + btrfs_end_transaction(trans);
> > +
> > +out:
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Helper to manage the transaction for deleting an orphan item.
> > + */
> > +static int del_orphan(struct btrfs_inode *inode)
>
> Same here.
My comment is dumb again, but the nlink check does make this function
marginally more useful for re-use/correctness.
>
> > +{
> > + struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans;
> > + struct btrfs_root *root = inode->root;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * If the inode has no links, it is either already unlinked, or was
> > + * created with O_TMPFILE. In either case, it should have an orphan from
> > + * that other operation. Rather than reference count the orphans, we
> > + * simply ignore them here, because we only invoke the verity path in
> > + * the orphan logic when i_nlink is 0.
> > + */
> > + if (!inode->vfs_inode.i_nlink)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + trans = btrfs_start_transaction(root, 1);
> > + if (IS_ERR(trans))
> > + return PTR_ERR(trans);
> > +
> > + ret = btrfs_del_orphan_item(trans, root, btrfs_ino(inode));
> > + if (ret) {
> > + btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret);
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
> > + btrfs_end_transaction(trans);
> > + return ret;
> > +}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-12 18:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <cover.1620241221.git.boris@bur.io>
2021-05-05 19:20 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] btrfs: add compat_flags to btrfs_inode_item Boris Burkov
2021-05-11 19:11 ` David Sterba
2021-05-17 21:48 ` David Sterba
2021-05-19 21:45 ` Boris Burkov
2021-06-07 21:43 ` David Sterba
2021-05-25 18:12 ` Eric Biggers
2021-06-07 21:10 ` David Sterba
2021-05-05 19:20 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] btrfs: initial fsverity support Boris Burkov
2021-05-06 0:09 ` kernel test robot
2021-05-11 19:20 ` David Sterba
2021-05-11 20:31 ` David Sterba
2021-05-11 21:52 ` Boris Burkov
2021-05-12 17:10 ` David Sterba
2021-05-13 19:19 ` Boris Burkov
2021-05-17 21:40 ` David Sterba
2021-05-12 17:34 ` David Sterba
2021-05-05 19:20 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] btrfs: check verity for reads of inline extents and holes Boris Burkov
2021-05-12 17:57 ` David Sterba
2021-05-12 18:25 ` Boris Burkov
2021-05-05 19:20 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] btrfs: fallback to buffered io for verity files Boris Burkov
2021-05-05 19:20 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] btrfs: verity metadata orphan items Boris Burkov
2021-05-12 17:48 ` David Sterba
2021-05-12 18:08 ` Boris Burkov [this message]
2021-05-12 23:36 ` David Sterba
2021-05-05 19:20 [PATCH v4 0/5] btrfs: support fsverity Boris Burkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YJwZuTXDfObB6Nbi@zen \
--to=boris@bur.io \
--cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).