From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82630C433EF for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 16:34:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1349078AbhKXQh5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Nov 2021 11:37:57 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49658 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1349074AbhKXQh5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Nov 2021 11:37:57 -0500 Received: from mail-qk1-x72c.google.com (mail-qk1-x72c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81D40C061574 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 08:34:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qk1-x72c.google.com with SMTP id a11so3395247qkh.13 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 08:34:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=toxicpanda-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=YXHJrZH5jDSng1VZmT5hIPEi8ydT6KlxMBbCeb+vup4=; b=BMkm9nL3oVXggTWwrvScIeSrSbp+qNKI6+mz6n6ZYIBXTYi5x5djIeKgA4GTDMwMIT vMjruRAk87Ztr83UjrU3Keya5ZnOzmalkKufpuYVYufxYclH/AQv/7IO3rmej/0M6cAT 88PkfU0sQqj+p22ZmWCYZbYaW6HgmwIIMLKXmasdsVVTCozWYuWl/+nSGkLPQdNl5VRx +9ZhiEYDsaZJIdWeFQN2YePrL12/2FUylsBAxGeGtPypv8s4eWuKX5NGP57wpSWYQRz+ 7WPLqbzbqFZhqf+5ntMCuh2FoNoU5NNj2rlIa+ow1dJuZsODHpmvNZQ2sCRS7yWAnk4B 2aXA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=YXHJrZH5jDSng1VZmT5hIPEi8ydT6KlxMBbCeb+vup4=; b=4RXf9W2n9qlKZtfCxZpRDiHq4xjHE5w1bv1wRr2gSQauP9dn4BXDBTVl9vdq7EA4eD dvxdcyFcF+ghuZ8dMp09pG9LuiwWpSCK36MTN4McI21K9hR9snCFY/PpyDMFPw+6Y4ce K4m8v8HDbSwahZWItD4zjhxlGmoeFLJDJNoHx51jt3cB1NvxQ871FtJR/C+Cb2mkms+h iN9pj1vHbB/VS9J9avhnp+EvTVoNuX0GQb2s7yom/c52AugcC83LiahjyuIBQIj+S84Z 9qTAT2fKO6c9Tvprnn81tbshhMphMvG01fwSndBOYR5R2oQBvR0jSkeyxR7PxxQnB2LI EmXA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531gYGAlDMLi+3Zl548sduzRQVGoIBrIad/h/mUs+gDG+WPhjxSm DqIQ8BnRhc61pCnmdWm1rk1pRQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxTRLNPYBeY3oRBQncImZZR6oo0mkN5LLjTodVP3JCB3xmfApWBUybezCQ11b0GcarCAgZt6Q== X-Received: by 2002:a37:9445:: with SMTP id w66mr7608680qkd.410.1637771686613; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 08:34:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (cpe-174-109-172-136.nc.res.rr.com. [174.109.172.136]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m4sm109898qtu.87.2021.11.24.08.34.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 24 Nov 2021 08:34:46 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 11:34:45 -0500 From: Josef Bacik To: Johannes Thumshirn Cc: David Sterba , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, Nikolay Borisov , Naohiro Aota Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/21] btrfs: first batch of zoned cleanups Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 01:30:26AM -0800, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > Here's a first batch of cleanups for the zoend code. It reduces the number of > calls to btrfs_is_zoned() outside of zoned.[ch] from 46 on misc-next to 33. > > As I had to create a scrub.h file, I also moved the scrub related function > prototypes from ctree.h to scrub.h. > > Johannes Thumshirn (21): > btrfs: zoned: encapsulate inode locking for zoned relocation > btrfs: zoned: simplify btrfs_check_meta_write_pointer > btrfs: zoned: sink zone check into btrfs_repair_one_zone > btrfs: zoned: it's pointless to check for REQ_OP_ZONE_APPEND and > btrfs_is_zoned > btrfs: zoned: move compatible fs flags check to zoned code > btrfs: zoned: move mark_block_group_to_copy to zoned code > btrfs: zoned: move btrfs_finish_block_group_to_copy to zoned code > btrfs: zoned: move is_block_group_to_copy to zoned code > btrfs: zoned: skip zoned check if block_group is marked as copy > btrfs: move struct scrub_ctx to scrub.h > btrfs: zoned: move fill_writer_pointer_gap to zoned code > btrfs: zoned: sync_write_pointer_for_zoned to zoned code > btrfs: make scrub_submit and scrub_wr_submit non-static > btrfs: zoned: move sync_replace_for_zoned to zoned code > btrfs: zoned: move finish_extent_writes_for_zoned to zoned code > btrfs: move btrfs_scrub_dev() definition to scrub.h > btrfs: move btrfs_scrub_pause() definition to scrub.h > btrfs: move btrfs_scrub_continue() definition to scrub.h > btrfs: move btrfs_scrub_cancel() definition to scrub.h > btrfs: move btrfs_scrub_cancel_dev() definition to scrub.h > btrfs: move btrfs_scrub_progress() definition to scrub.h These last six could have been a single patch but no sense in redoing it now. Fix up that random return and you can add Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik to the series, thanks, Josef