From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DEFEC433EF for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 20:37:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07BEF6323A for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 20:37:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1347170AbhKOUj5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Nov 2021 15:39:57 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40300 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1347480AbhKOTj7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Nov 2021 14:39:59 -0500 Received: from mail-qk1-x72b.google.com (mail-qk1-x72b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D14FFC06120B for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 11:33:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qk1-x72b.google.com with SMTP id g28so13619200qkk.9 for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 11:33:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=toxicpanda-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=GMcmCPPNkqZXuEK/w8V9ah5eSf6E1mq8BDWrVP/doXU=; b=vQHvYM/HwFOME5YzsvaBFRKnZNLrr0JWRzo1y1VGk+o6rvRw+2uB6bVK94ns1hq2Rb 846cdeO3oDrUUCRDhW6R3cucon0l4REmuEgyr6R9IR5Rw7NtwdMnhSh43kuDcqCza6YK QZTBtmdZaCJqv2ClhDqAX43QL3dBLGrdXNLeUnknVEW3IOymkghIQE6Nw3ly+YJ0GLzI EjvYFQ8BJkWUlH0N0v0Zy09ZuMqTEoiOT1pl4ATbl0Gkh3EKPoO0Oc7nwc00GRrNbA0x vR9lFYG3Ur1vU9uMXKw2pS/a970+SslJ8t7/aT3bURy6/ppLYsp49cQllnxFj/zPHmo4 RaUQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=GMcmCPPNkqZXuEK/w8V9ah5eSf6E1mq8BDWrVP/doXU=; b=A67g/NtWRhOWHoivnmGazbyApDVEmjH8jJu8ndlcktN1gmwejCns7m5TLNxw/YJwOA dUhmxXfIUTcdecq06suq/DX7UWpU3ysRhqNLqeAtN8AZbT1kKqZbFZhCrS4qKqR7rFys ce46RPY1LSqs70JA6qVKjErVWH5w01DgxzZF5Llqo2Glv4omYDTV0unseru0KJ6eG6lv a0dWfT0rhhrglZ3pBtIxQNAkIebaFwLPbm4HK6TautfTgfwTlCbSQhm/jg6mV99IbuJ4 XddXTbYcm1r18xD85ozODVOCE9C2jgCku2IbyXVwyQIZl6VGZTWRqZYyCEjDHv3XckCh EjAw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53334W3f+qGz4/e5W/7SRmeQXoEG+o4o3ppY86ZrAwKOndO1y+z2 6HUd1+eDsJPGRghGtB2HUx4A8Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzyDUv1Dd4go1GgdAkSGeaMiOEHT0h/DtxXE5N/yA6e3BN4juWzgkDp9kWIliViAxunK+ti/A== X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:1350:: with SMTP id c16mr1273828qkl.229.1637004795016; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 11:33:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (cpe-174-109-172-136.nc.res.rr.com. [174.109.172.136]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f10sm7616607qkp.135.2021.11.15.11.33.14 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 15 Nov 2021 11:33:14 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 14:33:08 -0500 From: Josef Bacik To: Stefan Roesch Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] btrfs: Add new test for setting the chunk size. Message-ID: References: <20211102212329.3708782-1-shr@fb.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211102212329.3708782-1-shr@fb.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 02:23:29PM -0700, Stefan Roesch wrote: > Summary: > > Add new testcase for testing the new btrfs sysfs knob to change the > chunk size. The new knob uses /sys/fs/btrfs//allocation/ type>/chunk_size. > > The test case implements three different cases: > - Test allocation with the default chunk size > - Test allocation after increasing the chunk size > - Test allocation when the free space is smaller than the chunk size. > > Note: this test needs to force the allocation of space. It uses the > /sys/fs/btrfs//allocation//force_chunk_alloc knob. > > Testing: > The test has been run with volumes of different sizes. > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Roesch Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik Thanks, Josef