public inbox for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
To: fdmanana@kernel.org
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] btrfs: optimize btree insertions and some cleanups
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2021 14:45:12 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YakiSB114RBn6gnu@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1638440535.git.fdmanana@suse.com>

On Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 10:30:34AM +0000, fdmanana@kernel.org wrote:
> From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
> 
> This patchset optimizes btree insertions to allow better parallelism, by
> having insertions unlocking upper level nodes sooner and avoid blocking
> other tasks, or reduce the time they are blocked, that want to use the
> same nodes. The optimization is in patch 2/6, patch 1/6 is preparation
> for it, and the rest are just cleanups or removing stale code and comments.
> 
> Filipe Manana (6):
>   btrfs: allow generic_bin_search() to take low boundary as an argument
>   btrfs: try to unlock parent nodes earlier when inserting a key
>   btrfs: remove useless condition check before splitting leaf
>   btrfs: move leaf search logic out of btrfs_search_slot()
>   btrfs: remove BUG_ON() after splitting leaf
>   btrfs: remove stale comment about locking at btrfs_search_slot()
> 
>  fs/btrfs/ctree.c | 254 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 181 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.33.0

You can add

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>

to the series, thanks,

Josef

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-12-02 19:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-02 10:30 [PATCH 0/6] btrfs: optimize btree insertions and some cleanups fdmanana
2021-12-02 10:30 ` [PATCH 1/6] btrfs: allow generic_bin_search() to take low boundary as an argument fdmanana
2021-12-02 10:30 ` [PATCH 2/6] btrfs: try to unlock parent nodes earlier when inserting a key fdmanana
2021-12-02 10:30 ` [PATCH 3/6] btrfs: remove useless condition check before splitting leaf fdmanana
2021-12-02 10:30 ` [PATCH 4/6] btrfs: move leaf search logic out of btrfs_search_slot() fdmanana
2021-12-02 10:30 ` [PATCH 5/6] btrfs: remove BUG_ON() after splitting leaf fdmanana
2021-12-02 10:30 ` [PATCH 6/6] btrfs: remove stale comment about locking at btrfs_search_slot() fdmanana
2021-12-02 19:45 ` Josef Bacik [this message]
2021-12-06 18:29 ` [PATCH 0/6] btrfs: optimize btree insertions and some cleanups David Sterba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YakiSB114RBn6gnu@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=fdmanana@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox