From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@kernel.org>
To: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com,
Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: check WRITE_ERR when trying to read an extent buffer
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 10:32:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YbhyxZPERYm4DYFU@debian9.Home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1676bf652be3e37ef3ae55ed784c8f0ab2ff3f8f.1639423346.git.josef@toxicpanda.com>
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 02:22:33PM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
> Filipe reported a hang when we have errors on btrfs. This turned out to
> be a side-effect of my fix 666cc468424b ("btrfs: clear extent buffer
> uptodate when we fail to write it") which made it so we clear
The commit in Linus' tree is c2e39305299f0118298c2201f6d6cc7d3485f29e.
> EXTENT_BUFFER_UPTODATE on an eb when we fail to write it out.
>
> Below is a paste of Filipe's analysis he got from using drgn to debug
> the hang
>
> """
> btree readahead code calls read_extent_buffer_pages(), sets ->io_pages to
> a value while writeback of all pages has not yet completed:
> --> writeback for the first 3 pages finishes, we clear
> EXTENT_BUFFER_UPTODATE from eb on the first page when we get an
> error.
> --> at this point eb->io_pages is 1 and we cleared Uptodate bit from the
> first 3 pages
> --> read_extent_buffer_pages() does not see EXTENT_BUFFER_UPTODATE() so
> it continues, it's able to lock the pages since we obviously don't
> hold the pages locked during writeback
> --> read_extent_buffer_pages() then computes 'num_reads' as 3, and sets
> eb->io_pages to 3, since only the first page does not have Uptodate
> bit set at this point
> --> writeback for the remaining page completes, we ended decrementing
> eb->io_pages by 1, resulting in eb->io_pages == 2, and therefore
> never calling end_extent_buffer_writeback(), so
> EXTENT_BUFFER_WRITEBACK remains in the eb's flags
> --> of course, when the read bio completes, it doesn't and shouldn't
> call end_extent_buffer_writeback()
> --> we should clear EXTENT_BUFFER_UPTODATE only after all pages of
> the eb finished writeback? or maybe make the read pages code
> wait for writeback of all pages of the eb to complete before
> checking which pages need to be read, touch ->io_pages, submit
> read bio, etc
>
> writeback bit never cleared means we can hang when aborting a
> transaction, at:
>
> btrfs_cleanup_one_transaction()
> btrfs_destroy_marked_extents()
> wait_on_extent_buffer_writeback()
> """
>
> This is a problem because our writes are not synchronized with reads in
> any way. We clear the UPTODATE flag and then we can easily come in and
> try to read the EB while we're still waiting on other bio's to
> complete.
>
> We have two options here, we could lock all the pages, and then check to
> see if eb->io_pages != 0 to know if we've already got an outstanding
> write on the eb.
>
> Or we can simply check to see if we have WRITE_ERR set on this extent
> buffer. We set this bit _before_ we clear UPTODATE, so if the read gets
> triggered because we aren't UPTODATE because of a write error we're
> guaranteed to have WRITE_ERR set, and in this case we can simply return
> -EIO. This will fix the reported hang.
>
> Reported-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
As this is already in Linus' tree, and it was tagged for stable backports, it should
include:
Fixes: c2e39305299f01 ("btrfs: clear extent buffer uptodate when we fail to write it")
David can probably add that and fix the commit id above.
Other than that, it looks good, thanks.
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
> index 762100a00978..38c5e9eb9a10 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
> @@ -6601,6 +6601,14 @@ int read_extent_buffer_pages(struct extent_buffer *eb, int wait, int mirror_num)
> if (test_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_UPTODATE, &eb->bflags))
> return 0;
>
> + /*
> + * We could have had EXTENT_BUFFER_UPTODATE cleared by the write
> + * operation, which could potentially still be in flight. In this case
> + * we simply want to return an error.
> + */
> + if (unlikely(test_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_WRITE_ERR, &eb->bflags)))
> + return -EIO;
> +
> if (eb->fs_info->sectorsize < PAGE_SIZE)
> return read_extent_buffer_subpage(eb, wait, mirror_num);
>
> --
> 2.26.3
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-14 10:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-13 19:22 [PATCH] btrfs: check WRITE_ERR when trying to read an extent buffer Josef Bacik
2021-12-14 10:32 ` Filipe Manana [this message]
2021-12-14 14:19 ` David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YbhyxZPERYm4DYFU@debian9.Home \
--to=fdmanana@kernel.org \
--cc=fdmanana@suse.com \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox