From: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
To: Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijack@libero.it>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
Zygo Blaxell <ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org>,
Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>,
Sinnamohideen Shafeeq <shafeeqs@panasas.com>,
Paul Jones <paul@pauljones.id.au>,
Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijack@inwind.it>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] btrfs: add flags to give an hint to the chunk allocator
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2022 14:10:34 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YdYXWlp+naKtzV+E@zen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <377d6c51cb957fbad5627bb93ff0a76ce9ba79da.1639766364.git.kreijack@inwind.it>
On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 07:47:17PM +0100, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
> From: Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijack@inwind.it>
>
> Add the following flags to give an hint about which chunk should be
> allocated in which a disk:
>
> - BTRFS_DEV_ALLOCATION_HINT_PREFERRED_DATA
> preferred data chunk, but metadata chunk allowed
> - BTRFS_DEV_ALLOCATION_HINT_PREFERRED_METADATA
> preferred metadata chunk, but data chunk allowed
> - BTRFS_DEV_ALLOCATION_HINT_METADATA_ONLY
> only metadata chunk allowed
> - BTRFS_DEV_ALLOCATION_HINT_DATA_ONLY
> only data chunk allowed
Weighing in on the naming discussion:
I think DATA_ONLY > ONLY_DATA, with my best argument for this subjective
opinion being that it follows the example of read-only.
Therefore, I think you should go with DATA_ONLY, DATA_PREFERRED,
METADATA_ONLY, METADATA_PREFERRED. Definitely put ONLY/PREFERRED on the
same side of DATA/METADATA for all four, regardless of which you choose.
Looks good otherwise.
>
> Signed-off-by: Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijack@inwid.it>
> ---
> include/uapi/linux/btrfs_tree.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/btrfs_tree.h b/include/uapi/linux/btrfs_tree.h
> index 5416f1f1a77a..55da906c2eac 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/btrfs_tree.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/btrfs_tree.h
> @@ -386,6 +386,22 @@ struct btrfs_key {
> __u64 offset;
> } __attribute__ ((__packed__));
>
> +/* dev_item.type */
> +
> +/* btrfs chunk allocation hint */
> +#define BTRFS_DEV_ALLOCATION_HINT_BIT_COUNT 2
> +/* btrfs chunk allocation hint mask */
> +#define BTRFS_DEV_ALLOCATION_HINT_MASK \
> + ((1 << BTRFS_DEV_ALLOCATION_HINT_BIT_COUNT) -1)
> +/* preferred data chunk, but metadata chunk allowed */
> +#define BTRFS_DEV_ALLOCATION_HINT_PREFERRED_DATA (0ULL)
> +/* preferred metadata chunk, but data chunk allowed */
> +#define BTRFS_DEV_ALLOCATION_HINT_PREFERRED_METADATA (1ULL)
> +/* only metadata chunk are allowed */
> +#define BTRFS_DEV_ALLOCATION_HINT_METADATA_ONLY (2ULL)
> +/* only data chunk allowed */
> +#define BTRFS_DEV_ALLOCATION_HINT_DATA_ONLY (3ULL)
> +
> struct btrfs_dev_item {
> /* the internal btrfs device id */
> __le64 devid;
> --
> 2.34.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-05 22:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-17 18:47 [RFC][V9][PATCH 0/6] btrfs: allocation_hint mode Goffredo Baroncelli
2021-12-17 18:47 ` [PATCH 1/6] btrfs: add flags to give an hint to the chunk allocator Goffredo Baroncelli
2022-01-05 22:10 ` Boris Burkov [this message]
2022-01-06 8:53 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2021-12-17 18:47 ` [PATCH 2/6] btrfs: export the device allocation_hint property in sysfs Goffredo Baroncelli
2022-01-05 21:57 ` Boris Burkov
2021-12-17 18:47 ` [PATCH 3/6] btrfs: change the device allocation_hint property via sysfs Goffredo Baroncelli
2021-12-17 18:47 ` [PATCH 4/6] btrfs: add allocation_hint mode Goffredo Baroncelli
2022-01-05 23:48 ` Boris Burkov
2022-01-06 10:09 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2021-12-17 18:47 ` [PATCH 5/6] btrfs: rename dev_item->type to dev_item->flags Goffredo Baroncelli
2022-01-05 23:50 ` Boris Burkov
2021-12-17 18:47 ` [PATCH 6/6] btrfs: add allocation_hint option Goffredo Baroncelli
2022-01-05 2:44 ` [RFC][V9][PATCH 0/6] btrfs: allocation_hint mode Boris Burkov
2022-01-05 9:16 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2022-01-05 17:55 ` Boris Burkov
2022-01-05 18:07 ` Zygo Blaxell
2022-01-05 18:16 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2022-01-05 18:29 ` Boris Burkov
2022-01-05 22:21 ` Boris Burkov
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-01-06 17:49 [PATCH 0/6][V10] btrfs: " Goffredo Baroncelli
2022-01-06 17:49 ` [PATCH 1/6] btrfs: add flags to give an hint to the chunk allocator Goffredo Baroncelli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YdYXWlp+naKtzV+E@zen \
--to=boris@bur.io \
--cc=ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org \
--cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=kreijack@inwind.it \
--cc=kreijack@libero.it \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@pauljones.id.au \
--cc=shafeeqs@panasas.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).