Re: [PATCH] btrfs: make enough noise for fstests to catch extent buffer leakage

[Filipe Manana <fdmanana@kernel.org>]

On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 06:01:33PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> Although we have btrfs_extent_buffer_leak_debug_check() (enabled by
> CONFIG_BTRFS_DEBUG option) to detect and warn QA testers that we have
> some extent buffer leakage, it's just pr_err(), not noisy enough for
> fstests to cache.
> 
> So here we trigger a WARN_ON_ONCE() if the allocated_ebs list is not
> empty.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
> ---
>  fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
> index 78486bbd1ac9..593eafc30261 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
> @@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ void btrfs_extent_buffer_leak_debug_check(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
>  		return;
>  
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&fs_info->eb_leak_lock, flags);
> +	WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(&fs_info->allocated_ebs));

I would make it WARN_ON(), so that it's less likely to get unnoticed.

Anyway:

Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>

Thanks.

>  	while (!list_empty(&fs_info->allocated_ebs)) {
>  		eb = list_first_entry(&fs_info->allocated_ebs,
>  				      struct extent_buffer, leak_list);
> -- 
> 2.35.1
>