From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@kernel.org>
To: Naohiro Aota <Naohiro.Aota@wdc.com>
Cc: Johannes Thumshirn <Johannes.Thumshirn@wdc.com>,
"linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: fix outstanding extents calculation
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2022 14:45:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YkG775DW5ip1gktJ@debian9.Home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220328133635.saheqkncmgmh2xn2@naota-xeon>
On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 01:36:36PM +0000, Naohiro Aota wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 02:21:28PM +0100, Filipe Manana wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 01:14:02PM +0000, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> > > On 28/03/2022 15:09, Filipe Manana wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 09:32:05PM +0900, Naohiro Aota wrote:
> > > >> Running generic/406 causes the following WARNING in btrfs_destroy_inode()
> > > >> which tells there is outstanding extents left.
> > > >
> > > > I can't trigger the warning with generic/406.
> > > > Any special setup or config to trigger it?
> > > >
> > > > The change looks fine to me, however I'm curious why this isn't triggered
> > > > with generic/406, nor anyone else reported it before, since the test is
> > > > fully deterministic.
> > > >
> > >
> > > I am able to trigger the WARN() with a different test (which is for a different,
> > > not yet solved problem) on my zoned setup. With this patch, the WARN() is gone.
> >
> > I have no doubts about the fix being correct.
> > I'm just puzzled why I can't trigger it with generic/406, given that it's a very
> > deterministic test.
> >
> > If there's any special config or setup (mount options, zoned fs, etc), I would
> > like to have it explicitly mentioned in the changelog.
>
> I don't think it's super special. I can always reproduce it on 1GB
> zram device. Here is the mkfs setup, and no mount options are
> specified.
Ok, that, the 1G device, explains it.
It's trigfering a short-write, due to not being able to allocate a large extent and
instead allocating a smaller one. And the test does not fail if we write less than
what we requested, as it redirects xfs_io's stdout to the .full file and does not
check that we wrote the exact amount we asked to write (which is a rather bad test
IMO, should also check we are able to read what we wrote before, etc).
The change looks good to me.
With an updated subject, you can add:
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Thanks.
>
> ++ mkfs.btrfs -f -d single -m single /dev/zram0
> btrfs-progs v5.16.2
> See http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org for more information.
>
> Performing full device TRIM /dev/zram0 (1.00GiB) ...
> NOTE: several default settings have changed in version 5.15, please make sure
> this does not affect your deployments:
> - DUP for metadata (-m dup)
> - enabled no-holes (-O no-holes)
> - enabled free-space-tree (-R free-space-tree)
>
> Label: (null)
> UUID: b7260fb1-fa0e-4acd-8c3d-0530799a9fd3
> Node size: 16384
> Sector size: 4096
> Filesystem size: 1.00GiB
> Block group profiles:
> Data: single 8.00MiB
> Metadata: single 8.00MiB
> System: single 4.00MiB
> SSD detected: yes
> Zoned device: no
> Incompat features: extref, skinny-metadata, no-holes
> Runtime features: free-space-tree
> Checksum: crc32c
> Number of devices: 1
> Devices:
> ID SIZE PATH
> 1 1.00GiB /dev/zram0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-28 13:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-28 12:32 [PATCH] btrfs: fix outstanding extents calculation Naohiro Aota
2022-03-28 12:58 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2022-03-28 13:08 ` Filipe Manana
2022-03-28 13:14 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2022-03-28 13:21 ` Filipe Manana
2022-03-28 13:22 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2022-03-28 13:36 ` Naohiro Aota
2022-03-28 13:45 ` Filipe Manana [this message]
2022-03-28 13:17 ` Filipe Manana
2022-03-28 13:40 ` Naohiro Aota
2022-03-28 19:26 ` David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YkG775DW5ip1gktJ@debian9.Home \
--to=fdmanana@kernel.org \
--cc=Johannes.Thumshirn@wdc.com \
--cc=Naohiro.Aota@wdc.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox