From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E408C43219 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 21:15:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237159AbiDEVL6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Apr 2022 17:11:58 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58136 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1573272AbiDESlH (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Apr 2022 14:41:07 -0400 Received: from drax.kayaks.hungrycats.org (drax.kayaks.hungrycats.org [174.142.148.226]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2676120BE2 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 11:39:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by drax.kayaks.hungrycats.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id A31832ADA6D; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 14:38:59 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2022 14:38:59 -0400 From: Zygo Blaxell To: Marc MERLIN Cc: Josef Bacik , "linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: Rebuilding 24TB Raid5 array (was btrfs corruption: parent transid verify failed + open_ctree failed) Message-ID: References: <20220405001808.GC5566@merlins.org> <20220405002826.GD5566@merlins.org> <20220405005809.GE5566@merlins.org> <20220405011559.GF5566@merlins.org> <20220405014259.GG5566@merlins.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220405014259.GG5566@merlins.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 04, 2022 at 06:42:59PM -0700, Marc MERLIN wrote: > On Mon, Apr 04, 2022 at 09:22:26PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote: > > Ok lets try again with -b 13577821667328, and if the owner doesn't say > > ROOT_TREE try 13577775284224 and then 13577814573056. Thanks, > > EXTENT_TREE, FS_TREE, and FS_TREE > > And shit, I got distracted and sent the text output to > /dev/mapper/dshelf1a, so I clobbered about 30K of the device. > I'm assuming there was probably something there? First superblock is at 64K, and the first 1M of every device is unused. A 30K write at the beginning will overwrite nothing important to btrfs.