public inbox for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 05/12] btrfs: add a helper to queue a corrupted sector for read repair
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 06:44:27 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YmqaOynJjWS2XB76@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2fd10883-5a4d-5cbd-d09f-7a30bb326a4a@suse.com>

On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 01:20:37PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> This function will get called very frequently, and I really want to avoid
> doing such re-search every time from the beginning of the original bio.
> 
> Maybe we can cache a bvec_iter and using the bi_size to check if the target
> offset is still beyond us (then advance), or re-wind and re-search from the
> beginning.
> 
> I guess there is no existing helper to do the same work, right?

It is basically impossible to review this because you just add a
standalone static helper without the callers.  Please split the
work into logical chunks that actually are reviewable.  Yes, that will
be a pretty large patch, but that's still much better than having to
jump around hal a dozen ones.

No, there is no way to efficiently look up what bvec in a bio some
offset falls into, because the bvecs are variable length.

It seems like the caller (at least the one added a little later, not
sure if there are more) is iterating over the bitmap and then calls
this for every bit set.  So for that you're much better off making
the __bio_for_each_segment the main loop, and then at the beginning of
the loop checking the bitmap if we need to handle this sector.


> > +	struct bio_list read_bios;

I'd just calls this bios.  Obviously they are used for reading here.

Also please be very careful about dead locks.  The mempool for the
btrfs_bios is small right now, you need to size it up by the
largerst number of bios that can be on this list.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-28 13:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <cover.1651043617.git.wqu@suse.com>
2022-04-27  7:18 ` [PATCH RFC v2 01/12] btrfs: introduce a pure data checksum checking helper Qu Wenruo
2022-04-28 13:26   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-27  7:18 ` [PATCH RFC v2 02/12] btrfs: always save bio::bi_iter into btrfs_bio::iter before submitting Qu Wenruo
2022-04-28  5:16   ` Qu Wenruo
2022-04-28 13:32   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-28 22:41     ` Qu Wenruo
2022-04-29 15:09       ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-29 23:04         ` Qu Wenruo
2022-04-27  7:18 ` [PATCH RFC v2 03/12] btrfs: remove duplicated parameters from submit_data_read_repair() Qu Wenruo
2022-04-28 13:32   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-27  7:18 ` [PATCH RFC v2 04/12] btrfs: add btrfs_read_repair_ctrl to record corrupted sectors Qu Wenruo
2022-04-28 13:37   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-28 22:51     ` Qu Wenruo
2022-04-29  0:09       ` Qu Wenruo
2022-04-29 15:12         ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-29 15:11       ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-27  7:18 ` [PATCH RFC v2 05/12] btrfs: add a helper to queue a corrupted sector for read repair Qu Wenruo
2022-04-28  5:20   ` Qu Wenruo
2022-04-28 13:44     ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2022-04-28 22:55       ` Qu Wenruo
2022-04-29  7:11         ` Qu Wenruo
2022-04-29 15:14         ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-29 23:08           ` Qu Wenruo
2022-05-01 23:59           ` Qu Wenruo
2022-05-02 16:45             ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-02 23:00               ` Qu Wenruo
2022-04-27  7:18 ` [PATCH RFC v2 06/12] btrfs: introduce a helper to repair from one mirror Qu Wenruo
2022-04-27  7:18 ` [PATCH RFC v2 07/12] btrfs: allow btrfs read repair to submit all writes in one go Qu Wenruo
2022-04-27  7:18 ` [PATCH RFC v2 08/12] btrfs: switch buffered read to the new btrfs_read_repair_* based repair routine Qu Wenruo
2022-04-27  7:18 ` [PATCH RFC v2 09/12] btrfs: switch direct IO routine to use btrfs_read_repair_ctrl Qu Wenruo
2022-04-27  7:18 ` [PATCH RFC v2 10/12] btrfs: cleanup btrfs_repair_one_sector() Qu Wenruo
2022-04-28 13:45   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-27  7:18 ` [PATCH RFC v2 11/12] btrfs: remove io_failure_record infrastructure completely Qu Wenruo
2022-04-27  7:18 ` [PATCH RFC v2 12/12] btrfs: remove btrfs_inode::io_failure_tree Qu Wenruo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YmqaOynJjWS2XB76@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wqu@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox