From: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>, Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] btrfs: remove the btrfs_map_bio return value
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 09:59:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YqoP+t4bNsgPd6u7@zen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220615151515.888424-4-hch@lst.de>
On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 05:15:13PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Always consume the bio and call the end_io handler on error instead of
> returning an error and letting the caller handle it. This matches
> what the block layer submission does and avoids any confusion on who
> needs to handle errors.
>
> As this requires touching all the callers, rename the function to
> btrfs_submit_bio, which describes the functionality much better.
One high level question: should we make btrfs_wq_submit_bio follow the
same API of not having the caller call bio_endio? The names are similar
enough that having them behave the same seems useful.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/compression.c | 8 ++------
> fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 21 ++++++++++-----------
> fs/btrfs/inode.c | 25 ++++++++++---------------
> fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 13 ++++++++-----
> fs/btrfs/volumes.h | 4 ++--
> 5 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/compression.c b/fs/btrfs/compression.c
> index 63d542961b78a..907fc8a4c092c 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/compression.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/compression.c
> @@ -593,9 +593,7 @@ blk_status_t btrfs_submit_compressed_write(struct btrfs_inode *inode, u64 start,
> }
>
> ASSERT(bio->bi_iter.bi_size);
> - ret = btrfs_map_bio(fs_info, bio, 0);
> - if (ret)
> - goto finish_cb;
> + btrfs_submit_bio(fs_info, bio, 0);
> bio = NULL;
> }
> cond_resched();
> @@ -931,9 +929,7 @@ void btrfs_submit_compressed_read(struct inode *inode, struct bio *bio,
> sums += fs_info->csum_size * nr_sectors;
>
> ASSERT(comp_bio->bi_iter.bi_size);
> - ret = btrfs_map_bio(fs_info, comp_bio, mirror_num);
> - if (ret)
> - goto finish_cb;
> + btrfs_submit_bio(fs_info, comp_bio, mirror_num);
> comp_bio = NULL;
> }
> }
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
> index 800ad3a9c68ed..5df6865428a5c 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
> @@ -728,7 +728,6 @@ static void run_one_async_done(struct btrfs_work *work)
> {
> struct async_submit_bio *async;
> struct inode *inode;
> - blk_status_t ret;
>
> async = container_of(work, struct async_submit_bio, work);
> inode = async->inode;
> @@ -746,11 +745,7 @@ static void run_one_async_done(struct btrfs_work *work)
> * This changes nothing when cgroups aren't in use.
> */
> async->bio->bi_opf |= REQ_CGROUP_PUNT;
> - ret = btrfs_map_bio(btrfs_sb(inode->i_sb), async->bio, async->mirror_num);
> - if (ret) {
> - async->bio->bi_status = ret;
> - bio_endio(async->bio);
> - }
> + btrfs_submit_bio(btrfs_sb(inode->i_sb), async->bio, async->mirror_num);
> }
>
> static void run_one_async_free(struct btrfs_work *work)
> @@ -814,7 +809,7 @@ static blk_status_t btree_submit_bio_start(struct inode *inode, struct bio *bio,
> {
> /*
> * when we're called for a write, we're already in the async
> - * submission context. Just jump into btrfs_map_bio
> + * submission context. Just jump into btrfs_submit_bio.
> */
> return btree_csum_one_bio(bio);
> }
> @@ -839,11 +834,15 @@ void btrfs_submit_metadata_bio(struct inode *inode, struct bio *bio, int mirror_
> bio->bi_opf |= REQ_META;
>
> if (btrfs_op(bio) != BTRFS_MAP_WRITE) {
> - ret = btrfs_map_bio(fs_info, bio, mirror_num);
> - } else if (!should_async_write(fs_info, BTRFS_I(inode))) {
> + btrfs_submit_bio(fs_info, bio, mirror_num);
> + return;
> + }
> + if (!should_async_write(fs_info, BTRFS_I(inode))) {
> ret = btree_csum_one_bio(bio);
> - if (!ret)
> - ret = btrfs_map_bio(fs_info, bio, mirror_num);
> + if (!ret) {
> + btrfs_submit_bio(fs_info, bio, mirror_num);
> + return;
> + }
> } else {
> /*
> * kthread helpers are used to submit writes so that
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> index 7a54f964ff378..6f665bf59f620 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> @@ -2617,7 +2617,8 @@ void btrfs_submit_data_write_bio(struct inode *inode, struct bio *bio, int mirro
> goto out;
> }
> }
> - ret = btrfs_map_bio(fs_info, bio, mirror_num);
> + btrfs_submit_bio(fs_info, bio, mirror_num);
> + return;
> out:
> if (ret) {
> bio->bi_status = ret;
> @@ -2645,14 +2646,13 @@ void btrfs_submit_data_read_bio(struct inode *inode, struct bio *bio,
> * not, which is why we ignore skip_sum here.
> */
> ret = btrfs_lookup_bio_sums(inode, bio, NULL);
> - if (ret)
> - goto out;
> - ret = btrfs_map_bio(fs_info, bio, mirror_num);
> -out:
> if (ret) {
> bio->bi_status = ret;
> bio_endio(bio);
> + return;
> }
> +
> + btrfs_submit_bio(fs_info, bio, mirror_num);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -7863,8 +7863,7 @@ static void submit_dio_repair_bio(struct inode *inode, struct bio *bio,
> BUG_ON(bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_WRITE);
>
> refcount_inc(&dip->refs);
> - if (btrfs_map_bio(fs_info, bio, mirror_num))
With this change, won't we no longer do this refcount_dec on error?
Does bio_endio do it or something? On the other hand, I feel like we
would not have called bio_endio in this path before and now we do.
More generally, were you able to exercise the error paths in this code?
> - refcount_dec(&dip->refs);
> + btrfs_submit_bio(fs_info, bio, mirror_num);
> }
>
> static blk_status_t btrfs_check_read_dio_bio(struct btrfs_dio_private *dip,
> @@ -7972,7 +7971,8 @@ static inline blk_status_t btrfs_submit_dio_bio(struct bio *bio,
> file_offset - dip->file_offset);
> }
> map:
> - return btrfs_map_bio(fs_info, bio, 0);
> + btrfs_submit_bio(fs_info, bio, 0);
> + return BLK_STS_OK;
> }
>
> static void btrfs_submit_direct(const struct iomap_iter *iter,
> @@ -10277,7 +10277,6 @@ static blk_status_t submit_encoded_read_bio(struct btrfs_inode *inode,
> struct bio *bio, int mirror_num)
> {
> struct btrfs_encoded_read_private *priv = bio->bi_private;
> - struct btrfs_bio *bbio = btrfs_bio(bio);
> struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = inode->root->fs_info;
> blk_status_t ret;
>
> @@ -10288,12 +10287,8 @@ static blk_status_t submit_encoded_read_bio(struct btrfs_inode *inode,
> }
>
> atomic_inc(&priv->pending);
> - ret = btrfs_map_bio(fs_info, bio, mirror_num);
> - if (ret) {
> - atomic_dec(&priv->pending);
Same question as above
> - btrfs_bio_free_csum(bbio);
> - }
> - return ret;
> + btrfs_submit_bio(fs_info, bio, mirror_num);
> + return BLK_STS_OK;
> }
>
> static blk_status_t btrfs_encoded_read_verify_csum(struct btrfs_bio *bbio)
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> index ff777e39d5f4a..739676944e94d 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> @@ -6724,8 +6724,8 @@ static void submit_stripe_bio(struct btrfs_io_context *bioc,
> }
> }
> btrfs_debug_in_rcu(fs_info,
> - "btrfs_map_bio: rw %d 0x%x, sector=%llu, dev=%lu (%s id %llu), size=%u",
> - bio_op(bio), bio->bi_opf, bio->bi_iter.bi_sector,
> + "%s: rw %d 0x%x, sector=%llu, dev=%lu (%s id %llu), size=%u",
> + __func__, bio_op(bio), bio->bi_opf, bio->bi_iter.bi_sector,
> (unsigned long)dev->bdev->bd_dev, rcu_str_deref(dev->name),
> dev->devid, bio->bi_iter.bi_size);
>
> @@ -6735,8 +6735,8 @@ static void submit_stripe_bio(struct btrfs_io_context *bioc,
> submit_bio(bio);
> }
>
> -blk_status_t btrfs_map_bio(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, struct bio *bio,
> - int mirror_num)
> +void btrfs_submit_bio(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, struct bio *bio,
> + int mirror_num)
> {
> u64 logical = bio->bi_iter.bi_sector << 9;
> u64 length = bio->bi_iter.bi_size;
> @@ -6781,7 +6781,10 @@ blk_status_t btrfs_map_bio(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, struct bio *bio,
> }
> out_dec:
> btrfs_bio_counter_dec(fs_info);
> - return errno_to_blk_status(ret);
> + if (ret) {
> + bio->bi_status = errno_to_blk_status(ret);
> + bio_endio(bio);
> + }
> }
>
> static bool dev_args_match_fs_devices(const struct btrfs_dev_lookup_args *args,
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.h b/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
> index 588367c76c463..c0f5bbba9c6ac 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
> @@ -573,8 +573,8 @@ int btrfs_read_chunk_tree(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info);
> struct btrfs_block_group *btrfs_create_chunk(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
> u64 type);
> void btrfs_mapping_tree_free(struct extent_map_tree *tree);
> -blk_status_t btrfs_map_bio(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, struct bio *bio,
> - int mirror_num);
> +void btrfs_submit_bio(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, struct bio *bio,
> + int mirror_num);
> int btrfs_open_devices(struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices,
> fmode_t flags, void *holder);
> struct btrfs_device *btrfs_scan_one_device(const char *path,
> --
> 2.30.2
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-15 17:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-15 15:15 cleanup btrfs bio submission Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-15 15:15 ` [PATCH 1/5] btrfs: remove a bunch of pointles stripe_len arguments Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-15 21:28 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-06-17 9:53 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2022-06-15 15:15 ` [PATCH 2/5] btrfs: return proper mapped length for RAID56 profiles in __btrfs_map_block() Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-17 9:54 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2022-06-15 15:15 ` [PATCH 3/5] btrfs: remove the btrfs_map_bio return value Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-15 16:59 ` Boris Burkov [this message]
2022-06-15 17:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-16 1:02 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-06-17 9:55 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2022-06-15 15:15 ` [PATCH 4/5] btrfs: remove the raid56_parity_{write,recover} " Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-16 1:05 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-06-16 1:06 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-06-16 6:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-16 9:53 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-06-16 10:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-15 15:15 ` [PATCH 5/5] btrfs: remove bioc->stripes_pending Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-15 18:16 ` Boris Burkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YqoP+t4bNsgPd6u7@zen \
--to=boris@bur.io \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wqu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox