From: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>, Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] btrfs: remove bioc->stripes_pending
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 11:16:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YqoiDrxfriDiW9Js@zen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220615151515.888424-6-hch@lst.de>
On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 05:15:15PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Replace the the stripes_pending field with the pending counter in the
> bio.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 100 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
> fs/btrfs/volumes.h | 1 -
> 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> index 3a8c437bdd65b..bf80a850347cd 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> @@ -5889,7 +5889,6 @@ static struct btrfs_io_context *alloc_btrfs_io_context(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_
> sizeof(u64) * (total_stripes),
> GFP_NOFS|__GFP_NOFAIL);
>
> - atomic_set(&bioc->error, 0);
> refcount_set(&bioc->refs, 1);
>
> bioc->fs_info = fs_info;
> @@ -6619,46 +6618,21 @@ static void btrfs_end_bio_work(struct work_struct *work)
> struct btrfs_bio *bbio =
> container_of(work, struct btrfs_bio, end_io_work);
>
> - bio_endio(&bbio->bio);
> -}
> -
> -static void btrfs_end_bioc(struct btrfs_io_context *bioc, bool async)
> -{
> - struct bio *orig_bio = bioc->orig_bio;
> - struct btrfs_bio *bbio = btrfs_bio(orig_bio);
> -
> - bbio->mirror_num = bioc->mirror_num;
> - orig_bio->bi_private = bioc->private;
> - orig_bio->bi_end_io = bioc->end_io;
> -
> - /*
> - * Only send an error to the higher layers if it is beyond the tolerance
> - * threshold.
> - */
> - if (atomic_read(&bioc->error) > bioc->max_errors)
> - orig_bio->bi_status = BLK_STS_IOERR;
> - else
> - orig_bio->bi_status = BLK_STS_OK;
> -
> - if (btrfs_op(orig_bio) == BTRFS_MAP_READ && async) {
> - INIT_WORK(&bbio->end_io_work, btrfs_end_bio_work);
> - queue_work(btrfs_end_io_wq(bioc), &bbio->end_io_work);
> - } else {
> - bio_endio(orig_bio);
> - }
> -
> - btrfs_put_bioc(bioc);
> + bbio->bio.bi_end_io(&bbio->bio);
> }
>
> static void btrfs_end_bio(struct bio *bio)
> {
> struct btrfs_io_stripe *stripe = bio->bi_private;
> struct btrfs_io_context *bioc = stripe->bioc;
> + struct bio *orig_bio = bioc->orig_bio;
> + struct btrfs_bio *bbio = btrfs_bio(orig_bio);
>
> if (bio->bi_status) {
> atomic_inc(&bioc->error);
> - if (bio->bi_status == BLK_STS_IOERR ||
> - bio->bi_status == BLK_STS_TARGET) {
> + if (stripe->dev && stripe->dev->bdev &&
> + (bio->bi_status == BLK_STS_IOERR ||
> + bio->bi_status == BLK_STS_TARGET)) {
> if (btrfs_op(bio) == BTRFS_MAP_WRITE)
> btrfs_dev_stat_inc_and_print(stripe->dev,
> BTRFS_DEV_STAT_WRITE_ERRS);
> @@ -6671,12 +6645,35 @@ static void btrfs_end_bio(struct bio *bio)
> }
> }
>
> - if (bio != bioc->orig_bio)
> + btrfs_bio_counter_dec(bioc->fs_info);
> +
> + if (bio != orig_bio) {
> + bio_endio(orig_bio);
> bio_put(bio);
> + return;
> + }
>
> - btrfs_bio_counter_dec(bioc->fs_info);
> - if (atomic_dec_and_test(&bioc->stripes_pending))
> - btrfs_end_bioc(bioc, true);
> + /*
> + * Only send an error to the higher layers if it is beyond the tolerance
> + * threshold.
> + */
> + if (atomic_read(&bioc->error) > bioc->max_errors)
> + orig_bio->bi_status = BLK_STS_IOERR;
> + else
> + orig_bio->bi_status = BLK_STS_OK;
> +
> + bbio->mirror_num = bioc->mirror_num;
> + orig_bio->bi_end_io = bioc->end_io;
> + orig_bio->bi_private = bioc->private;
> + if (btrfs_op(orig_bio) == BTRFS_MAP_READ) {
> + bbio->device = stripe->dev;
> + INIT_WORK(&bbio->end_io_work, btrfs_end_bio_work);
> + queue_work(btrfs_end_io_wq(bioc), &bbio->end_io_work);
> + } else {
> + orig_bio->bi_end_io(orig_bio);
> + }
> +
> + btrfs_put_bioc(bioc);
> }
>
> static void submit_stripe_bio(struct btrfs_io_context *bioc,
> @@ -6687,28 +6684,30 @@ static void submit_stripe_bio(struct btrfs_io_context *bioc,
> u64 physical = bioc->stripes[dev_nr].physical;
> struct bio *bio;
>
> - if (!dev || !dev->bdev ||
> - test_bit(BTRFS_DEV_STATE_MISSING, &dev->dev_state) ||
> - (btrfs_op(orig_bio) == BTRFS_MAP_WRITE &&
> - !test_bit(BTRFS_DEV_STATE_WRITEABLE, &dev->dev_state))) {
> - atomic_inc(&bioc->error);
> - if (atomic_dec_and_test(&bioc->stripes_pending))
> - btrfs_end_bioc(bioc, false);
> - return;
> - }
> -
> if (clone) {
> - bio = bio_alloc_clone(dev->bdev, orig_bio, GFP_NOFS, &fs_bio_set);
> + bio = bio_alloc_clone(NULL, orig_bio, GFP_NOFS, &fs_bio_set);
> + bio_inc_remaining(orig_bio);
> } else {
> bio = orig_bio;
> - bio_set_dev(bio, dev->bdev);
> - btrfs_bio(bio)->device = dev;
> }
>
> bioc->stripes[dev_nr].bioc = bioc;
> bio->bi_private = &bioc->stripes[dev_nr];
> bio->bi_end_io = btrfs_end_bio;
> bio->bi_iter.bi_sector = physical >> 9;
> +
> + btrfs_bio_counter_inc_noblocked(fs_info);
> +
> + if (!dev || !dev->bdev ||
> + test_bit(BTRFS_DEV_STATE_MISSING, &dev->dev_state) ||
> + (btrfs_op(bio) == BTRFS_MAP_WRITE &&
> + !test_bit(BTRFS_DEV_STATE_WRITEABLE, &dev->dev_state))) {
> + bio_io_error(bio);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + bio_set_dev(bio, dev->bdev);
> +
Extra tabbed newline. There's at least one more checkpatch failure like
this one in the series.
> /*
> * For zone append writing, bi_sector must point the beginning of the
> * zone
> @@ -6729,8 +6728,6 @@ static void submit_stripe_bio(struct btrfs_io_context *bioc,
> (unsigned long)dev->bdev->bd_dev, rcu_str_deref(dev->name),
> dev->devid, bio->bi_iter.bi_size);
>
> - btrfs_bio_counter_inc_noblocked(fs_info);
> -
> btrfsic_check_bio(bio);
> submit_bio(bio);
> }
> @@ -6760,7 +6757,6 @@ void btrfs_submit_bio(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, struct bio *bio,
> bioc->orig_bio = bio;
> bioc->private = bio->bi_private;
> bioc->end_io = bio->bi_end_io;
> - atomic_set(&bioc->stripes_pending, total_devs);
>
> if ((bioc->map_type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID56_MASK) &&
> ((btrfs_op(bio) == BTRFS_MAP_WRITE) || (mirror_num > 1))) {
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.h b/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
> index c0f5bbba9c6ac..ecbaf92323030 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
> @@ -444,7 +444,6 @@ struct btrfs_discard_stripe {
> */
> struct btrfs_io_context {
> refcount_t refs;
> - atomic_t stripes_pending;
> struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info;
> u64 map_type; /* get from map_lookup->type */
> bio_end_io_t *end_io;
> --
> 2.30.2
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-15 18:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-15 15:15 cleanup btrfs bio submission Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-15 15:15 ` [PATCH 1/5] btrfs: remove a bunch of pointles stripe_len arguments Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-15 21:28 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-06-17 9:53 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2022-06-15 15:15 ` [PATCH 2/5] btrfs: return proper mapped length for RAID56 profiles in __btrfs_map_block() Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-17 9:54 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2022-06-15 15:15 ` [PATCH 3/5] btrfs: remove the btrfs_map_bio return value Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-15 16:59 ` Boris Burkov
2022-06-15 17:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-16 1:02 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-06-17 9:55 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2022-06-15 15:15 ` [PATCH 4/5] btrfs: remove the raid56_parity_{write,recover} " Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-16 1:05 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-06-16 1:06 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-06-16 6:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-16 9:53 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-06-16 10:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-15 15:15 ` [PATCH 5/5] btrfs: remove bioc->stripes_pending Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-15 18:16 ` Boris Burkov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YqoiDrxfriDiW9Js@zen \
--to=boris@bur.io \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wqu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox