public inbox for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
To: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
Cc: Zorro Lang <zlang@kernel.org>,
	ltp@lists.linux.it, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH 1/3] ioctl_ficlone02.c: set all_filesystems to zero
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2024 08:58:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z066Fj9VQVlTOMp_@rei.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241203045310.GA414034@pevik>

Hi!
> > > It's a nice feature to be able to force testing on filesystem even it's set to
> > > be skipped without need to manually enable the filesystem and recompile.
> > > (It helps testing with LTP compiled as a package without need to compile LTP.)
> > > Therefore I would avoid this.
> 
> > I guess that this should be another env variable e.g.
> > LTP_FORCE_SINGLE_FS_TYPE and it should print a big fat warning that it's
> > only for development purposes.
> 
> Well, LTP_SINGLE_FS_TYPE already has "Testing only"

That was maybe how we intended it but we exposed the API and it seems
that there is a usecase for it so people are possibly using it.

> and that was the reason it just forced filesystem regardless "skip"
> setup. Sure, we can turn it into "normal" variable and introduce
> LTP_FORCE_SINGLE_FS_TYPE if it's needed.  But that would be an use
> case if anybody uses LTP really to test particular filesystem. And it
> would affect only .all_filesystem tests (e.g. user's responsibility
> would be to point TMPDIR to that particular system on non-
> .all_filesystem tests).

There is a usecase we haven't figured out, when you want to test a
single filesystem, you do not want to waste time on the rest of the
filesystems and LTP_SINGlE_FS_TYPE nearly works for that usecase.

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz

  reply	other threads:[~2024-12-03  7:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-01  9:36 [PATCH 0/3] LTP random fixes for xfs and btrfs Zorro Lang
2024-12-01  9:36 ` [PATCH 1/3] ioctl_ficlone02.c: set all_filesystems to zero Zorro Lang
2024-12-02 13:36   ` [LTP] " Cyril Hrubis
2024-12-02 13:59     ` Cyril Hrubis
2024-12-02 14:42       ` Petr Vorel
2024-12-02 15:23         ` Cyril Hrubis
2024-12-03  4:53           ` Petr Vorel
2024-12-03  7:58             ` Cyril Hrubis [this message]
2024-12-03  9:24               ` Petr Vorel
2024-12-09  5:53         ` Zorro Lang
2024-12-09  6:14           ` Petr Vorel
2024-12-11 12:08             ` Cyril Hrubis
2024-12-11 19:40               ` Petr Vorel
2024-12-01  9:36 ` [PATCH 2/3] stat04+lstat03: fix bad blocksize mkfs option for xfs Zorro Lang
2024-12-02 13:56   ` [LTP] " Cyril Hrubis
2024-12-01  9:36 ` [PATCH 3/3] stat04+lstat03: skip test on btrfs Zorro Lang
2024-12-02 13:55   ` [LTP] " Cyril Hrubis
2024-12-01  9:55 ` [PATCH 0/3] LTP random fixes for xfs and btrfs Qu Wenruo
2024-12-03 16:22   ` David Sterba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z066Fj9VQVlTOMp_@rei.lan \
    --to=chrubis@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    --cc=pvorel@suse.cz \
    --cc=zlang@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox