public inbox for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.de>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
	Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>,
	Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>,
	Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/21] btrfs: wait ordered range before locking during truncate
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2023 09:03:49 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZAdudW1SCWmnboOb@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e9629218282f3e016517f1280b48c5d194fd7c40.1677793433.git.rgoldwyn@suse.com>

So, one thing I've been wondering about for a while is why btrfs even
does all these explicit waits for ordered extents.  The ordered_extent
is effectively a mechanism to describe a range of I/O.

So why can't we use the nornal mechanisms to wait for I/O, that is the
completion of writeback for buffered I/O (i.e. filemap_fdatawait*)
and inode_dio_wait for direct I/O?  I've been wanting to look deeper
into this for a while, so this might be a good time to bring it up.

  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-07 17:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <cover.1677793433.git.rgoldwyn@suse.com>
2023-03-02 22:24 ` [PATCH 01/21] fs: readahead_begin() to call before locking folio Goldwyn Rodrigues
2023-03-06 16:53   ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-03-02 22:24 ` [PATCH 02/21] btrfs: add WARN_ON() on incorrect lock range Goldwyn Rodrigues
2023-03-08 19:28   ` Boris Burkov
2023-03-02 22:24 ` [PATCH 03/21] btrfs: Add start < end check in btrfs_debug_check_extent_io_range() Goldwyn Rodrigues
2023-03-08 19:29   ` Boris Burkov
2023-03-02 22:24 ` [PATCH 04/21] btrfs: make btrfs_qgroup_flush() non-static Goldwyn Rodrigues
2023-03-02 22:24 ` [PATCH 05/21] btrfs: Lock extents before pages for buffered write() Goldwyn Rodrigues
2023-03-02 22:24 ` [PATCH 06/21] btrfs: wait ordered range before locking during truncate Goldwyn Rodrigues
2023-03-07 17:03   ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2023-03-02 22:24 ` [PATCH 07/21] btrfs: lock extents while truncating Goldwyn Rodrigues
2023-03-02 22:24 ` [PATCH 08/21] btrfs: no need to lock extent while performing invalidate_folio() Goldwyn Rodrigues
2023-03-02 22:24 ` [PATCH 09/21] btrfs: lock extents before folio for read()s Goldwyn Rodrigues
2023-03-02 22:24 ` [PATCH 10/21] btrfs: lock extents before pages in writepages Goldwyn Rodrigues
2023-03-02 22:24 ` [PATCH 11/21] btrfs: locking extents for async writeback Goldwyn Rodrigues
2023-03-08 19:13   ` Boris Burkov
2023-03-02 22:24 ` [PATCH 12/21] btrfs: lock extents before pages - defrag Goldwyn Rodrigues
2023-03-02 22:24 ` [PATCH 13/21] btrfs: Perform memory faults under locked extent Goldwyn Rodrigues
2023-03-02 22:24 ` [PATCH 14/21] btrfs: writepage fixup lock rearrangement Goldwyn Rodrigues
2023-03-02 22:25 ` [PATCH 15/21] btrfs: lock extent before pages for encoded read ioctls Goldwyn Rodrigues
2023-03-02 22:25 ` [PATCH 16/21] btrfs: lock extent before pages in encoded write Goldwyn Rodrigues
2023-03-02 22:25 ` [PATCH 17/21] btrfs: btree_writepages lock extents before pages Goldwyn Rodrigues
2023-03-02 22:25 ` [PATCH 18/21] btrfs: check if writeback pages exist before starting writeback Goldwyn Rodrigues
2023-03-02 22:25 ` [PATCH 19/21] btrfs: lock extents before pages in relocation Goldwyn Rodrigues
2023-03-02 22:25 ` [PATCH 20/21] btrfs: Add inode->i_count instead of calling ihold() Goldwyn Rodrigues
2023-03-07 17:06   ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-03-08 23:03     ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2023-03-09  9:14       ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-03-11  3:52         ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2023-03-02 22:25 ` [PATCH 21/21] btrfs: debug extent locking Goldwyn Rodrigues

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZAdudW1SCWmnboOb@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rgoldwyn@suse.com \
    --cc=rgoldwyn@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox