From: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
To: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dsterba@suse.com, josef@toxicpanda.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/11] btrfs: reada: use sprout device_list_mutex
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 11:54:06 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a069ca08-664e-6720-6c4e-71e078fbb3f0@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b5ad15e6583f4e61cfd44344ef17ea7a93f6bb57.1598792561.git.anand.jain@oracle.com>
On 30.08.20 г. 17:40 ч., Anand Jain wrote:
> On an fs mounted using a sprout-device, the seed fs_devices are maintained
> in a linked list under fs_info->fs_devices. Each seed's fs_devices also
> have device_list_mutex initialized to protect against the potential race
> with delete threads. But the delete thread (at btrfs_rm_device()) is holding
> the fs_info::fs_devices::device_list_mutex mutex which is sprout's
> device_list_mutex instead of seed's device_list_mutex. Moreover, there
> aren't any significient benefits in using the seed::device_list_mutex
> instead of sprout::device_list_mutex.
>
> So this patch converts them of using the seed::device_list_mutex to
> sprout::device_list_mutex.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
nit: I'm beginning to think that the structure representing seed devices
shouldn't be a full-fledged btrfs_fs_devices but a slimmed down version
which contains only the necessary bits.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/reada.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/reada.c b/fs/btrfs/reada.c
> index c0035fc0ec67..9b54a51ba860 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/reada.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/reada.c
> @@ -776,13 +776,11 @@ static int __reada_start_for_fsdevs(struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices)
>
> do {
> enqueued = 0;
> - mutex_lock(&fs_devices->device_list_mutex);
> list_for_each_entry(device, &fs_devices->devices, dev_list) {
> if (atomic_read(&device->reada_in_flight) <
> MAX_IN_FLIGHT)
> enqueued += reada_start_machine_dev(device);
> }
> - mutex_unlock(&fs_devices->device_list_mutex);
> total += enqueued;
> } while (enqueued && total < 10000);
>
> @@ -795,10 +793,13 @@ static void __reada_start_machine(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
> int i;
> u64 enqueued = 0;
>
> + mutex_lock(&fs_devices->device_list_mutex);
> +
> enqueued += __reada_start_for_fsdevs(fs_devices);
> list_for_each_entry(seed_devs, &fs_devices->seed_list, seed_list)
> enqueued += __reada_start_for_fsdevs(seed_devs);
>
> + mutex_unlock(&fs_devices->device_list_mutex);
> if (enqueued == 0)
> return;
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-31 8:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-31 1:38 [PATCH 0/11] btrfs: seed fix null ptr, use only main device_list_mutex, and cleanups Anand Jain
2020-08-21 13:15 ` [PATCH RFC] btrfs/163: replace sprout instead of seed Anand Jain
2020-08-21 13:15 ` [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: initialize sysfs devid and device link for seed device Anand Jain
2020-08-21 13:15 ` [PATCH RFC 2/2] btrfs: fix replace of " Anand Jain
2020-08-21 14:38 ` Josef Bacik
2020-08-23 15:05 ` Anand Jain
2020-08-21 14:36 ` [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: initialize sysfs devid and device link for " Josef Bacik
2020-08-23 13:05 ` Anand Jain
2020-08-29 11:44 ` Anand Jain
2020-08-30 14:41 ` [PATCH] fstests: btrfs/163: replace sprout instead of seed Anand Jain
2020-08-30 14:40 ` Anand Jain
2020-08-30 14:40 ` [PATCH 01/11] btrfs: initialize sysfs devid and device link for seed device Anand Jain
2020-08-31 9:07 ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-08-31 12:00 ` Anand Jain
2020-08-31 16:21 ` Josef Bacik
2020-09-01 16:16 ` Anand Jain
2020-08-30 14:40 ` [PATCH 02/11] btrfs: refactor btrfs_sysfs_add_devices_dir Anand Jain
2020-08-30 14:40 ` [PATCH 03/11] btrfs: refactor btrfs_sysfs_remove_devices_dir Anand Jain
2020-08-31 8:58 ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-08-31 9:12 ` Anand Jain
2020-08-30 14:40 ` [PATCH 04/11] btrfs: reada: use sprout device_list_mutex Anand Jain
2020-08-31 8:54 ` Nikolay Borisov [this message]
2020-08-31 16:08 ` Josef Bacik
2020-09-01 9:02 ` Anand Jain
2020-08-30 14:41 ` [PATCH 05/11] btrfs: btrfs_init_devices_late: " Anand Jain
2020-08-31 8:37 ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-09-01 8:54 ` Anand Jain
2020-08-30 14:41 ` [PATCH 06/11] btrfs: open code list_head pointer in btrfs_init_dev_replace_tgtdev Anand Jain
2020-08-31 8:38 ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-08-30 14:41 ` [PATCH 07/11] btrfs: cleanup btrfs_remove_chunk Anand Jain
2020-08-31 8:43 ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-08-30 14:41 ` [PATCH 08/11] btrfs: cleanup btrfs_assign_next_active_device() Anand Jain
2020-08-31 8:44 ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-08-30 14:41 ` [PATCH 09/11] btrfs: cleanup unnecessary goto in open_seed_device Anand Jain
2020-08-31 8:44 ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-08-30 14:41 ` [PATCH 10/11] btrfs: btrfs_dev_replace_update_device_in_mapping_tree drop file global declare Anand Jain
2020-08-31 8:46 ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-08-30 14:41 ` [PATCH 11/11] btrfs: fix replace of seed device Anand Jain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a069ca08-664e-6720-6c4e-71e078fbb3f0@suse.com \
--to=nborisov@suse.com \
--cc=anand.jain@oracle.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox