From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] btrfs: extract the parity scrub code into a helper
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2025 20:02:15 +1030 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a07e2c42e9f29dce1bb50a9b875cf29dfa909afd.1762421429.git.wqu@suse.com> (raw)
The function scrub_raid56_parity_stripe() is handling the partity stripe
by the following steps:
- Scrub each data stripes
And make sure everything is fine in each data stripe
- Cache the data stripe into the raid bio
- Use the cached raid bio to scrub the target parity stripe
Extract the last two steps into a new helper,
scrub_radi56_cached_parity(), as a cleanup and make the error handling
more straightforward.
With the following minor cleanups:
- Use on-stack bio structure
The bio is always empty thus we do not need any bio vector nor the
block device. Thus there is no need to allocate a bio, the on-stack
one is more than enough to cut it.
- Remove the unnecessary btrfs_put_bioc() call if btrfs_map_block()
failed
If btrfs_map_block() is failed, @bioc_ret will not be touched thus
there is no need to call btrfs_put_bioc() in this case.
- Use a proper out: tag to do the cleanup
Now the error cleanup is much shorter and simpler, just
btrfs_bio_counter_dec() and bio_uninit().
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
---
Changelog:
v2:
- Rebased to the latest for-next branch
The latest branch has the memory leak fixed merged, causing a minor
conflict.
- Remove the DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK() inside the caller
Which is no longer utilized.
---
fs/btrfs/scrub.c | 93 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
index b6278406a103..726e0c5ed4f2 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
@@ -2113,24 +2113,69 @@ static int should_cancel_scrub(const struct scrub_ctx *sctx)
return 0;
}
+static int scrub_raid56_cached_parity(struct scrub_ctx *sctx,
+ struct btrfs_device *scrub_dev,
+ struct btrfs_chunk_map *map,
+ u64 full_stripe_start,
+ unsigned long *extent_bitmap)
+{
+ DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK(io_done);
+ struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = sctx->fs_info;
+ struct btrfs_io_context *bioc = NULL;
+ struct btrfs_raid_bio *rbio;
+ struct bio bio;
+ const int data_stripes = nr_data_stripes(map);
+ u64 length = btrfs_stripe_nr_to_offset(data_stripes);
+ int ret;
+
+ bio_init(&bio, NULL, NULL, 0, REQ_OP_READ);
+ bio.bi_iter.bi_sector = full_stripe_start >> SECTOR_SHIFT;
+ bio.bi_private = &io_done;
+ bio.bi_end_io = raid56_scrub_wait_endio;
+
+ btrfs_bio_counter_inc_blocked(fs_info);
+ ret = btrfs_map_block(fs_info, BTRFS_MAP_WRITE, full_stripe_start,
+ &length, &bioc, NULL, NULL);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ goto out;
+ /* For RAID56 write there must be an @bioc allocated. */
+ ASSERT(bioc);
+ rbio = raid56_parity_alloc_scrub_rbio(&bio, bioc, scrub_dev, extent_bitmap,
+ BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN >> fs_info->sectorsize_bits);
+ btrfs_put_bioc(bioc);
+ if (!rbio) {
+ ret = -ENOMEM;
+ goto out;
+ }
+ /* Use the recovered stripes as cache to avoid read them from disk again. */
+ for (int i = 0; i < data_stripes; i++) {
+ struct scrub_stripe *stripe = &sctx->raid56_data_stripes[i];
+
+ raid56_parity_cache_data_folios(rbio, stripe->folios,
+ full_stripe_start + (i << BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN_SHIFT));
+ }
+ raid56_parity_submit_scrub_rbio(rbio);
+ wait_for_completion_io(&io_done);
+ ret = blk_status_to_errno(bio.bi_status);
+out:
+ btrfs_bio_counter_dec(fs_info);
+ bio_uninit(&bio);
+ return ret;
+}
+
static int scrub_raid56_parity_stripe(struct scrub_ctx *sctx,
struct btrfs_device *scrub_dev,
struct btrfs_block_group *bg,
struct btrfs_chunk_map *map,
u64 full_stripe_start)
{
- DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK(io_done);
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = sctx->fs_info;
- struct btrfs_raid_bio *rbio;
- struct btrfs_io_context *bioc = NULL;
struct btrfs_path extent_path = { 0 };
struct btrfs_path csum_path = { 0 };
- struct bio *bio;
struct scrub_stripe *stripe;
bool all_empty = true;
const int data_stripes = nr_data_stripes(map);
unsigned long extent_bitmap = 0;
- u64 length = btrfs_stripe_nr_to_offset(data_stripes);
int ret;
ASSERT(sctx->raid56_data_stripes);
@@ -2252,42 +2297,8 @@ static int scrub_raid56_parity_stripe(struct scrub_ctx *sctx,
}
/* Now we can check and regenerate the P/Q stripe. */
- bio = bio_alloc(NULL, 1, REQ_OP_READ, GFP_NOFS);
- bio->bi_iter.bi_sector = full_stripe_start >> SECTOR_SHIFT;
- bio->bi_private = &io_done;
- bio->bi_end_io = raid56_scrub_wait_endio;
-
- btrfs_bio_counter_inc_blocked(fs_info);
- ret = btrfs_map_block(fs_info, BTRFS_MAP_WRITE, full_stripe_start,
- &length, &bioc, NULL, NULL);
- if (ret < 0) {
- bio_put(bio);
- btrfs_put_bioc(bioc);
- btrfs_bio_counter_dec(fs_info);
- goto out;
- }
- rbio = raid56_parity_alloc_scrub_rbio(bio, bioc, scrub_dev, &extent_bitmap,
- BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN >> fs_info->sectorsize_bits);
- btrfs_put_bioc(bioc);
- if (!rbio) {
- ret = -ENOMEM;
- bio_put(bio);
- btrfs_bio_counter_dec(fs_info);
- goto out;
- }
- /* Use the recovered stripes as cache to avoid read them from disk again. */
- for (int i = 0; i < data_stripes; i++) {
- stripe = &sctx->raid56_data_stripes[i];
-
- raid56_parity_cache_data_folios(rbio, stripe->folios,
- full_stripe_start + (i << BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN_SHIFT));
- }
- raid56_parity_submit_scrub_rbio(rbio);
- wait_for_completion_io(&io_done);
- ret = blk_status_to_errno(bio->bi_status);
- bio_put(bio);
- btrfs_bio_counter_dec(fs_info);
-
+ ret = scrub_raid56_cached_parity(sctx, scrub_dev, map, full_stripe_start,
+ &extent_bitmap);
out:
btrfs_release_path(&extent_path);
btrfs_release_path(&csum_path);
--
2.51.2
next reply other threads:[~2025-11-06 9:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-06 9:32 Qu Wenruo [this message]
2025-11-06 11:16 ` [PATCH v2] btrfs: extract the parity scrub code into a helper David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a07e2c42e9f29dce1bb50a9b875cf29dfa909afd.1762421429.git.wqu@suse.com \
--to=wqu@suse.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox