From: Sumit Narayan <sumnaray@gmail.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Question on Btrfs Benchmarking results
Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 13:49:45 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a18f491d0905291149n26b7f5bdg6dbe0785d68cc34d@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Hi,
Can someone explain to me why performance of random writes without
checksum is worse compared to that with checksum enabled for 8 and 32
threads while good for single thread? Shouldn't it be better in all
cases (without checksum better than with checksum)?
1 thread - http://tinyurl.com/ksby5j
8 threads - http://tinyurl.com/nepcdt
32 threads - http://tinyurl.com/n2x3rt
Thanks,
Sumit.
reply other threads:[~2009-05-29 18:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a18f491d0905291149n26b7f5bdg6dbe0785d68cc34d@mail.gmail.com \
--to=sumnaray@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox