From: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
To: Gabriel Niebler <gniebler@suse.com>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dsterba@suse.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: Turn fs_roots_radix in btrfs_fs_info into an XArray
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 14:59:22 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a2b7e2c4-440c-318c-ea1f-273be04591f0@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220426214525.14192-1-gniebler@suse.com>
On 27.04.22 г. 0:45 ч., Gabriel Niebler wrote:
> … rename it to simply fs_roots and adjust all usages of this object to use
> the XArray API, because it is notionally easier to use and unserstand, as
> it provides array semantics, and also takes care of locking for us,
> further simplifying the code.
>
> Also do some refactoring, esp. where the API change requires largely
> rewriting some functions, anyway.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Niebler <gniebler@suse.com>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/ctree.h | 5 +-
> fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 176 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> fs/btrfs/inode.c | 13 +--
> fs/btrfs/transaction.c | 67 +++++++---------
> 4 files changed, 126 insertions(+), 135 deletions(-)
>
<snip>
> @@ -2346,28 +2340,23 @@ void btrfs_put_root(struct btrfs_root *root)
>
> void btrfs_free_fs_roots(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
> {
> - int ret;
> - struct btrfs_root *gang[8];
> - int i;
> + struct btrfs_root *root;
> + unsigned long index = 0;
>
> while (!list_empty(&fs_info->dead_roots)) {
> - gang[0] = list_entry(fs_info->dead_roots.next,
> - struct btrfs_root, root_list);
> - list_del(&gang[0]->root_list);
> + root = list_entry(fs_info->dead_roots.next,
> + struct btrfs_root, root_list);
> + list_del(&root->root_list);
>
> - if (test_bit(BTRFS_ROOT_IN_RADIX, &gang[0]->state))
> - btrfs_drop_and_free_fs_root(fs_info, gang[0]);
> - btrfs_put_root(gang[0]);
> + if (test_bit(BTRFS_ROOT_IN_RADIX, &root->state))
> + btrfs_drop_and_free_fs_root(fs_info, root);
> + btrfs_put_root(root);
> }
>
> - while (1) {
> - ret = radix_tree_gang_lookup(&fs_info->fs_roots_radix,
> - (void **)gang, 0,
> - ARRAY_SIZE(gang));
> - if (!ret)
> - break;
> - for (i = 0; i < ret; i++)
> - btrfs_drop_and_free_fs_root(fs_info, gang[i]);
> + while (!xa_empty(&fs_info->fs_roots)) > + xa_for_each(&fs_info->fs_roots, index, root) {
Why do you need the nested loop structure? xa_for_each should be
sufficient as btrfs_free_fs_roots happens when the fs is being unmounted
and we can't get another loop added after having done xa_for_each. And
even if it could the nested loop structure won't help because we don't
hold any locks, so hypothetically speaking, even if there was a race
using nested loops doesn't solve it.
TLDR: Leavint this xa_for_each should be sufficient.
> + btrfs_drop_and_free_fs_root(fs_info, root);
> + }
> }
> }
>
<snip>
> @@ -4491,12 +4480,12 @@ void btrfs_drop_and_free_fs_root(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
> {
> bool drop_ref = false;
>
> - spin_lock(&fs_info->fs_roots_radix_lock);
> - radix_tree_delete(&fs_info->fs_roots_radix,
> - (unsigned long)root->root_key.objectid);
> + spin_lock(&fs_info->fs_roots_lock);
> + xa_erase(&fs_info->fs_roots,
> + (unsigned long)root->root_key.objectid);
nit: No need to have the 2nd argument on a new line, as the line is
short enough.
> if (test_and_clear_bit(BTRFS_ROOT_IN_RADIX, &root->state))
> drop_ref = true;
> - spin_unlock(&fs_info->fs_roots_radix_lock);
> + spin_unlock(&fs_info->fs_roots_lock);
>
> if (BTRFS_FS_ERROR(fs_info)) {
> ASSERT(root->log_root == NULL);
> @@ -4512,50 +4501,54 @@ void btrfs_drop_and_free_fs_root(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
>
> int btrfs_cleanup_fs_roots(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
> {
> - u64 root_objectid = 0;
> - struct btrfs_root *gang[8];
> - int i = 0;
> + struct btrfs_root *roots[8];
> + unsigned long index = 0;
> + int i;
nit: This can be defined into the 2 loops that use the variable.
> int err = 0;
> - unsigned int ret = 0;
> + int grabbed;
>
> while (1) {
> - spin_lock(&fs_info->fs_roots_radix_lock);
> - ret = radix_tree_gang_lookup(&fs_info->fs_roots_radix,
> - (void **)gang, root_objectid,
> - ARRAY_SIZE(gang));
> - if (!ret) {
> - spin_unlock(&fs_info->fs_roots_radix_lock);
> + struct btrfs_root *root;
> +
> + spin_lock(&fs_info->fs_roots_lock);
> + if (!xa_find(&fs_info->fs_roots, &index,
> + ULONG_MAX, XA_PRESENT)) {
> + spin_unlock(&fs_info->fs_roots_lock);
> break;
> }
> - root_objectid = gang[ret - 1]->root_key.objectid + 1;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < ret; i++) {
> - /* Avoid to grab roots in dead_roots */
> - if (btrfs_root_refs(&gang[i]->root_item) == 0) {
> - gang[i] = NULL;
> - continue;
> + grabbed = 0;
> + xa_for_each_start(&fs_info->fs_roots, index, root,
> + index) {
> + /* Avoid grabbing roots in dead_roots */
> + if (btrfs_root_refs(&root->root_item) == 0) {
> + roots[grabbed] = NULL;
> + } else {
> + /* Grab all the search results for later use */
> + roots[grabbed] = btrfs_grab_root(root);
> }
> - /* grab all the search result for later use */
> - gang[i] = btrfs_grab_root(gang[i]);
> + grabbed++;
> + if (grabbed >= ARRAY_SIZE(roots))
> + break;
> }
> - spin_unlock(&fs_info->fs_roots_radix_lock);
> + spin_unlock(&fs_info->fs_roots_lock);
>
> - for (i = 0; i < ret; i++) {
> - if (!gang[i])
> + for (i = 0; i < grabbed; i++) {
> + if (!roots[i])
> continue;
> - root_objectid = gang[i]->root_key.objectid;
> - err = btrfs_orphan_cleanup(gang[i]);
> + index = roots[i]->root_key.objectid;
> + err = btrfs_orphan_cleanup(roots[i]);
> if (err)
> break;
> - btrfs_put_root(gang[i]);
> + btrfs_put_root(roots[i]);
> }
> - root_objectid++;
> + index++;
> }
>
> - /* release the uncleaned roots due to error */
> - for (; i < ret; i++) {
> - if (gang[i])
> - btrfs_put_root(gang[i]);
> + /* Release the roots that remain uncleaned due to error */
> + for (; i < grabbed; i++) {
> + if (roots[i])
> + btrfs_put_root(roots[i]);
> }
> return err;
> }
> @@ -4872,31 +4865,36 @@ static void btrfs_error_commit_super(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
>
> static void btrfs_drop_all_logs(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
> {
> - struct btrfs_root *gang[8];
> - u64 root_objectid = 0;
> - int ret;
> + unsigned long index = 0;
>
> - spin_lock(&fs_info->fs_roots_radix_lock);
> - while ((ret = radix_tree_gang_lookup(&fs_info->fs_roots_radix,
> - (void **)gang, root_objectid,
> - ARRAY_SIZE(gang))) != 0) {
> + spin_lock(&fs_info->fs_roots_lock);
> + while (xa_find(&fs_info->fs_roots,
> + &index, ULONG_MAX, XA_PRESENT)) {
nit: No need to split across two lines as it's short enough.
> + struct btrfs_root *root;
> + struct btrfs_root *roots[8];
> int i;
nit: This can probably be defined inside the for loop
> + int grabbed = 0;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < ret; i++)
> - gang[i] = btrfs_grab_root(gang[i]);
> - spin_unlock(&fs_info->fs_roots_radix_lock);
> + xa_for_each_start(&fs_info->fs_roots, index, root,
> + index) {
> + roots[grabbed] = btrfs_grab_root(root);
> + grabbed++;
> + if (grabbed >= ARRAY_SIZE(roots))
> + break;
> + }
> + spin_unlock(&fs_info->fs_roots_lock);
>
> - for (i = 0; i < ret; i++) {
> - if (!gang[i])
> + for (i = 0; i < grabbed; i++) {
> + if (!roots[i])
> continue;
> - root_objectid = gang[i]->root_key.objectid;
> - btrfs_free_log(NULL, gang[i]);
> - btrfs_put_root(gang[i]);
> + index = roots[i]->root_key.objectid;
> + btrfs_free_log(NULL, roots[i]);
> + btrfs_put_root(roots[i]);
> }
> - root_objectid++;
> - spin_lock(&fs_info->fs_roots_radix_lock);
> + index++;
> + spin_lock(&fs_info->fs_roots_lock);
> }
> - spin_unlock(&fs_info->fs_roots_radix_lock);
> + spin_unlock(&fs_info->fs_roots_lock);
> btrfs_free_log_root_tree(NULL, fs_info);
> }
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> index 5082b9c70f8c..d0ef3a17ce11 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> @@ -3494,6 +3494,7 @@ int btrfs_orphan_cleanup(struct btrfs_root *root)
> u64 last_objectid = 0;
> int ret = 0, nr_unlink = 0;
>
> + /* Bail out if the cleanup is already running. */
nit: This seems like an irrelevant change.
> if (test_and_set_bit(BTRFS_ROOT_ORPHAN_CLEANUP, &root->state))
> return 0;
>
<snip>
> @@ -1404,9 +1402,8 @@ void btrfs_add_dead_root(struct btrfs_root *root)
> static noinline int commit_fs_roots(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans)
> {
> struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = trans->fs_info;
> - struct btrfs_root *gang[8];
> - int i;
> - int ret;
> + struct btrfs_root *root;
> + unsigned long index;
>
> /*
> * At this point no one can be using this transaction to modify any tree
> @@ -1414,17 +1411,11 @@ static noinline int commit_fs_roots(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans)
> */
> ASSERT(trans->transaction->state == TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_DOING);
>
> - spin_lock(&fs_info->fs_roots_radix_lock);
> - while (1) {
> - ret = radix_tree_gang_lookup_tag(&fs_info->fs_roots_radix,
> - (void **)gang, 0,
> - ARRAY_SIZE(gang),
> - BTRFS_ROOT_TRANS_TAG);
> - if (ret == 0)
> - break;
> - for (i = 0; i < ret; i++) {
> - struct btrfs_root *root = gang[i];
> - int ret2;
> + spin_lock(&fs_info->fs_roots_lock);
> + while (xa_marked(&fs_info->fs_roots, BTRFS_ROOT_TRANS_TAG)) {
> + xa_for_each_marked(&fs_info->fs_roots, index, root,
While the while/xa_for_each_marked and not straight xa_for_each_marked?
> + BTRFS_ROOT_TRANS_TAG) {
> + int ret;
>
> /*
> * At this point we can neither have tasks logging inodes
<snip>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-28 11:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-26 21:45 [PATCH] btrfs: Turn fs_roots_radix in btrfs_fs_info into an XArray Gabriel Niebler
2022-04-27 14:51 ` Gabriel Niebler
2022-04-27 19:21 ` David Sterba
2022-04-28 11:37 ` Nikolay Borisov
2022-04-27 20:07 ` David Sterba
2022-04-28 11:59 ` Nikolay Borisov [this message]
2022-05-02 8:59 ` Gabriel Niebler
2022-05-02 18:39 ` David Sterba
2022-05-03 8:01 ` Gabriel Niebler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a2b7e2c4-440c-318c-ea1f-273be04591f0@suse.com \
--to=nborisov@suse.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=gniebler@suse.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox