linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
To: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.de>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] btrfs: Allocate btrfs_ioctl_defrag_range_args on stack
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 14:27:12 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a3c30a94-a2ef-1cda-a3f7-67ed839ba4c7@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4b5d49128b43de57f5abfa9c922eb6cef3be9cba.1627418762.git.rgoldwyn@suse.com>

On 28/07/2021 05:17, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote:
> From: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
> 
> Instead of using kmalloc() to allocate btrfs_ioctl_defrag_range_args,
> allocate btrfs_ioctl_defrag_range_args on stack.
> 
> sizeof(btrfs_ioctl_defrag_range_args) = 48
> 
> Signed-off-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>

Looks good. A nit is below.

Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>

> ---
>   fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 24 ++++++++----------------
>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
> index 291c16d8576b..bc38a1af45c7 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
> @@ -3096,7 +3096,7 @@ static int btrfs_ioctl_defrag(struct file *file, void __user *argp)
>   {
>   	struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
>   	struct btrfs_root *root = BTRFS_I(inode)->root;
> -	struct btrfs_ioctl_defrag_range_args *range;
> +	struct btrfs_ioctl_defrag_range_args range = {0};
>   	int ret;
>   
>   	ret = mnt_want_write_file(file);
> @@ -3128,33 +3128,25 @@ static int btrfs_ioctl_defrag(struct file *file, void __user *argp)
>   			goto out;
>   		}
>   
> -		range = kzalloc(sizeof(*range), GFP_KERNEL);
> -		if (!range) {
> -			ret = -ENOMEM;
> -			goto out;
> -		}
> -
>   		if (argp) {
> -			if (copy_from_user(range, argp,
> -					   sizeof(*range))) {
> +			if (copy_from_user(&range, argp,
> +					   sizeof(range))) {

Nit.
This fits in a line.


>   				ret = -EFAULT;
> -				kfree(range);
>   				goto out;
>   			}
>   			/* compression requires us to start the IO */
> -			if ((range->flags & BTRFS_DEFRAG_RANGE_COMPRESS)) {
> -				range->flags |= BTRFS_DEFRAG_RANGE_START_IO;
> -				range->extent_thresh = (u32)-1;
> +			if ((range.flags & BTRFS_DEFRAG_RANGE_COMPRESS)) {
> +				range.flags |= BTRFS_DEFRAG_RANGE_START_IO;
> +				range.extent_thresh = (u32)-1;
>   			}
>   		} else {
>   			/* the rest are all set to zero by kzalloc */
> -			range->len = (u64)-1;
> +			range.len = (u64)-1;
>   		}
>   		ret = btrfs_defrag_file(file_inode(file), file,
> -					range, BTRFS_OLDEST_GENERATION, 0);
> +					&range, BTRFS_OLDEST_GENERATION, 0);
>   		if (ret > 0)
>   			ret = 0;
> -		kfree(range);
>   		break;
>   	default:
>   		ret = -EINVAL;
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-28  6:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-28 12:51 [PATCH 0/7] Change allocation from kmalloc() to stack Goldwyn Rodrigues
2021-07-27 21:17 ` [PATCH 1/7] btrfs: Allocate walk_control on stack Goldwyn Rodrigues
2021-07-28  5:11   ` Anand Jain
2021-07-28  5:25     ` Anand Jain
2021-07-28 11:08   ` David Sterba
2021-07-27 21:17 ` [PATCH 2/7] btrfs: Allocate file_ra_state " Goldwyn Rodrigues
2021-07-28  5:29   ` Anand Jain
2021-07-27 21:17 ` [PATCH 3/7] btrfs: Allocate btrfs_ioctl_get_subvol_info_args " Goldwyn Rodrigues
2021-07-28  5:59   ` Anand Jain
2021-07-29 17:08   ` David Sterba
2021-07-29 17:22   ` David Sterba
2021-07-27 21:17 ` [PATCH 4/7] btrfs: Allocate btrfs_ioctl_balance_args " Goldwyn Rodrigues
2021-07-28  0:02   ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-07-28  2:04     ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2021-07-28  1:19   ` kernel test robot
2021-07-27 21:17 ` [PATCH 5/7] btrfs: Allocate btrfs_ioctl_quota_rescan_args " Goldwyn Rodrigues
2021-07-28  6:01   ` Anand Jain
2021-07-27 21:17 ` [PATCH 6/7] btrfs: Allocate btrfs_ioctl_defrag_range_args " Goldwyn Rodrigues
2021-07-28  6:27   ` Anand Jain [this message]
2021-07-27 21:17 ` [PATCH 7/7] btrfs: Alloc backref_ctx " Goldwyn Rodrigues
2021-07-28  6:30   ` Anand Jain
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-07-27 21:17 [PATCH 0/7] Allocate structures on stack instead of kmalloc() Goldwyn Rodrigues
2021-07-29 16:51 ` David Sterba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a3c30a94-a2ef-1cda-a3f7-67ed839ba4c7@oracle.com \
    --to=anand.jain@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rgoldwyn@suse.com \
    --cc=rgoldwyn@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).