linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Foo Bar <marcoep@gmail.com>
To: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: btrfs check: backref lost, mismatch with its hash -- can't repair
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 21:14:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a74b27a0-11db-627f-a4b2-7d74cf0b3930@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47ee25a7-f0fd-e342-fc99-7bd0fd91af48@gmx.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3337 bytes --]

Finally restored by merging the last snapshot with what btrfs restore gave me
-- surprisingly almost the whole bunch of it :-)

Thanks for helping!

Cheers,

   Marco

Qu Wenruo wrote on 2018-01-30 02:24:
> 
> 
> On 2018年01月30日 02:16, ^m'e wrote:
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Got these
>>
>>   # ./btrfs.static inspect dump-super -fFa /dev/sdb3 |grep
>> backup_tree_root: | sort -u
>>         backup_tree_root:    180410073088    gen: 463765    level: 1
>>         backup_tree_root:    180415758336    gen: 463766    level: 1
>>         backup_tree_root:    180416364544    gen: 463767    level: 1
>>         backup_tree_root:    4194304    gen: 463764    level: 1
>>
>> but, nada: all have transid failures...
> 
> That's why I call it "small chance"
> 
>>
>> The backup snapshots are OK as per original check.
> 
> Then you should be OK to restore.
> 
> Thanks,
> Qu
> 
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 3:09 PM, Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2018年01月29日 22:49, ^m'e wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 2:04 PM, Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2018年01月29日 21:58, ^m'e wrote:
>>>>>> Thanks for the advice, Qu!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I used the system for a while, did some package upgrades -- writing in
>>>>>> the suspect corrupted area. Then tried a btrfs-send to my backup vol,
>>>>>> and it failed miserably with a nice kernel oops.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So I went for a lowmem repair:
>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> # ./btrfsck.static check --repair --mode=lowmem /dev/sdb3 2>&1 | tee
>>>>>> /mnt/custom/rescue/btrfs-recovery/btrfs-repair.BTR-POOL.1.log
>>>>>> WARNING: low-memory mode repair support is only partial
>>>>>> Fixed 0 roots.
>>>>>> checking extents
>>>>>> checking free space cache
>>>>>> checking fs roots
>>>>>> ERROR: failed to add inode 28891726 as orphan item root 257
>>>>>> ERROR: root 257 INODE[28891726] is orphan item
>>>>>
>>>>> At least I need dig the kernel code further to determine if the orphan
>>>>> inode handling in btrfs-progs is correct or not.
>>>>>
>>>>> So there won't be more dirty fix soon.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hopefully you could get some good backup and restore the system.
>>>>>
>>>>> At least the problem is limited to a very small range, and it's
>>>>> something we could handle easily.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for all your report,
>>>>> Qu
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Right.
>>>>
>>>> Meanwhile, could you please suggest the best course of action? btrfs
>>>> rescue or restore?
>>>> I have snapshots of my two subvols (rootfs, home -- now fs-checking
>>>> them  just in case...)
>>>
>>> Don't run --repair any more.
>>> It seems to make the case worse.
>>>
>>> While the RW mount with orphan cleanup abort seems to screwed up the
>>> filesystem.
>>>
>>> In this case, it's pretty hard to recover, but still has small chance.
>>>
>>> Use btrfs inspec dump-super to get backup roots:
>>>
>>> # btrfs inspect dump-super -fFa <device> |grep backup_tree_root: | sort
>>> | uniq
>>>
>>> And try all the 4 numbers in the following commands:
>>>
>>> # btrfs check --tree-root <number> <device>
>>>
>>> To see if is there any good one without transid error.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Qu
>>>


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-30 20:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-22 14:11 btrfs check: backref lost, mismatch with its hash -- can't repair ^m'e
2018-01-22 14:38 ` Qu Wenruo
2018-01-22 15:04   ` ^m'e
2018-01-24  8:49     ` Qu Wenruo
2018-01-24  9:18       ` Foo Bar
2018-01-24 10:14         ` Qu Wenruo
2018-01-24 11:57           ` ^m'e
2018-01-24 12:39             ` Qu Wenruo
2018-01-24 14:47               ` ^m'e
2018-01-24 19:00                 ` ^m'e
2018-01-24 20:41                   ` ^m'e
2018-01-25  0:59                     ` Qu Wenruo
2018-01-25 11:54                       ` ^m'e
2018-01-25 12:09                         ` Qu Wenruo
2018-01-25 12:29                           ` ^m'e
2018-01-25 12:37                             ` Qu Wenruo
2018-01-25 16:40                               ` ^m'e
2018-01-25 23:30                                 ` Qu Wenruo
2018-01-26 11:19                                   ` ^m'e
2018-01-26 12:16                                     ` Qu Wenruo
2018-01-26 15:15                                       ` ^m'e
2018-01-29  1:34                                         ` Qu Wenruo
2018-01-29 13:58                                           ` ^m'e
2018-01-29 14:04                                             ` Qu Wenruo
2018-01-29 14:49                                               ` ^m'e
2018-01-29 15:08                                                 ` ^m'e
2018-01-29 15:10                                                   ` Qu Wenruo
2018-01-29 15:09                                                 ` Qu Wenruo
2018-01-29 18:16                                                   ` ^m'e
2018-01-30  1:24                                                     ` Qu Wenruo
2018-01-30 20:14                                                       ` Foo Bar [this message]
2018-01-25  0:59                   ` Qu Wenruo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a74b27a0-11db-627f-a4b2-7d74cf0b3930@gmail.com \
    --to=marcoep@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).