From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>, Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
clm@fb.com, josef@toxicpanda.com, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.14 099/642] btrfs: prevent inline data extents read from touching blocks beyond its range
Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 10:15:09 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aCyObd3OCtX9K-Jd@lappy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250506131913.GD9140@twin.jikos.cz>
On Tue, May 06, 2025 at 03:19:13PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
>On Mon, May 05, 2025 at 06:05:15PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
>>
>> [ Upstream commit 1a5b5668d711d3d1ef447446beab920826decec3 ]
>>
>> Currently reading an inline data extent will zero out the remaining
>> range in the page.
>>
>> This is not yet causing problems even for block size < page size
>> (subpage) cases because:
>>
>> 1) An inline data extent always starts at file offset 0
>> Meaning at page read, we always read the inline extent first, before
>> any other blocks in the page. Then later blocks are properly read out
>> and re-fill the zeroed out ranges.
>>
>> 2) Currently btrfs will read out the whole page if a buffered write is
>> not page aligned
>> So a page is either fully uptodate at buffered write time (covers the
>> whole page), or we will read out the whole page first.
>> Meaning there is nothing to lose for such an inline extent read.
>>
>> But it's still not ideal:
>>
>> - We're zeroing out the page twice
>> Once done by read_inline_extent()/uncompress_inline(), once done by
>> btrfs_do_readpage() for ranges beyond i_size.
>>
>> - We're touching blocks that don't belong to the inline extent
>> In the incoming patches, we can have a partial uptodate folio, of
>> which some dirty blocks can exist while the page is not fully uptodate:
>>
>> The page size is 16K and block size is 4K:
>>
>> 0 4K 8K 12K 16K
>> | | |/////////| |
>>
>> And range [8K, 12K) is dirtied by a buffered write, the remaining
>> blocks are not uptodate.
>>
>> If range [0, 4K) contains an inline data extent, and we try to read
>> the whole page, the current behavior will overwrite range [8K, 12K)
>> with zero and cause data loss.
>>
>> So to make the behavior more consistent and in preparation for future
>> changes, limit the inline data extents read to only zero out the range
>> inside the first block, not the whole page.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
>> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
>
>This is not a stable dependency and the patch is not fixing anything
>but a preparation so this does not make much sense for stable backports,
>please drop it. Thanks.
Will do, thanks!
--
Thanks,
Sasha
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-20 14:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20250505221419.2672473-1-sashal@kernel.org>
2025-05-05 22:05 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.14 093/642] btrfs: make btrfs_discard_workfn() block_group ref explicit Sasha Levin
2025-05-05 22:05 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.14 094/642] btrfs: avoid linker error in btrfs_find_create_tree_block() Sasha Levin
2025-05-05 22:05 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.14 095/642] btrfs: run btrfs_error_commit_super() early Sasha Levin
2025-05-05 22:05 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.14 096/642] btrfs: fix non-empty delayed iputs list on unmount due to async workers Sasha Levin
2025-05-05 22:05 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.14 097/642] btrfs: properly limit inline data extent according to block size Sasha Levin
2025-05-05 22:05 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.14 098/642] btrfs: allow buffered write to avoid full page read if it's block aligned Sasha Levin
2025-05-05 22:05 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.14 099/642] btrfs: prevent inline data extents read from touching blocks beyond its range Sasha Levin
2025-05-06 13:19 ` David Sterba
2025-05-20 14:15 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2025-05-05 22:05 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.14 100/642] btrfs: get zone unusable bytes while holding lock at btrfs_reclaim_bgs_work() Sasha Levin
2025-05-05 22:05 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.14 101/642] btrfs: send: return -ENAMETOOLONG when attempting a path that is too long Sasha Levin
2025-05-05 22:05 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.14 102/642] btrfs: zoned: exit btrfs_can_activate_zone if BTRFS_FS_NEED_ZONE_FINISH is set Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aCyObd3OCtX9K-Jd@lappy \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=fdmanana@suse.com \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wqu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox