From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pj1-f74.google.com (mail-pj1-f74.google.com [209.85.216.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 366B626E6FE for ; Thu, 25 Sep 2025 13:41:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.216.74 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758807711; cv=none; b=LDql895SkQtg+gYuX01jgVx3mtZ8LSW98Xqj3vlNqFklFlhdFe4r+GRjdZjbAhQQJ0wv5cpemCOefwe7fnM5+5Ep6fn283mSOryfjpbNt0uV5Wu8jY56lUOXmCxW72ISJj/VmVcB8ZR3gVmlMoKyRn67h1FvHWy30drfJW5iT7U= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758807711; c=relaxed/simple; bh=AY4CdJYGfM13VOROhcQg+Kh48EgBR5zHwAOZ2HsNQ/U=; h=Date:In-Reply-To:Mime-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:From: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=THYx/5zDb+OmO+1OqerqYxpSxV35k8nsGxzZncpnq+T1q/N8khQMZV7UgUyEAcb01KYx0gV94ORyf3XuZT8fZIQmCKsKvdCL6p5E/4TgTLu9y9jmu87AlgiqYjz41CIkXU5L154IpUX9gjEO9cfkQ8m1cqHCv2CczbUc3AN1IE8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=flex--seanjc.bounces.google.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b=Ta4Zvme/; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.216.74 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=flex--seanjc.bounces.google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="Ta4Zvme/" Received: by mail-pj1-f74.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-32eddb7e714so953861a91.1 for ; Thu, 25 Sep 2025 06:41:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20230601; t=1758807709; x=1759412509; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=dU4j5xINCBqy1Rj7i7G1Vfx3gRcoZTHMrIeb9JUSMNk=; b=Ta4Zvme/0bGkwGeqDkxSgiyBcLTannHwyZGJyjoQgBsHBKwlguIrkIo+9goyln32FH rCN+qGCsZo124PFQ1v4rnck7rucvgokYlHfo28+MngyrMrXbN2vUEOTSVeqRd7JMUbuh 46UUrG7/3xFipy1FB/zPwLDxgG6c6EAcTU9yx+yfgGqmCYhQyo0SYd7NuKBN49BnjjJc 1YzXO7CXQKP4c0jjc/NoDfAi0QqWz5fJyTLnpqRALAY8ceGzVGNxrd9KmKG7rhxO2ljh Yxy58WJzSoCaK2PAxC3yMCzhegqrCXXB7Afj5x6lcCXR+jAL85eFfie418qeyDDOrgxa bDNQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1758807709; x=1759412509; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=dU4j5xINCBqy1Rj7i7G1Vfx3gRcoZTHMrIeb9JUSMNk=; b=IsZRNW+/3ReocB/MVjYzZCdJk3J6rsF4rUhYTIoTVmrdqMl7wPxHPUki82r8ek3+Xx 00TFRcEXISVxuqU9/+FrUM6VA3FbzHCyk/rrQtb1czorJLLkowTMD//3SEX5SlJQqdsp eqKUDXWN3UMR/zhLfo9stmA3fZI2kY7jk3JWSHJyfwrumiX2T9jj21swsCsz+n2fhweL 9R+yiqT8zp3Q5y/B+HcioOlP+54fF2GxKZLif3Z+Su9i/6mDvYCkH9DUeSFcAv0AH7s6 NJSZVqROPCo0RV5scCclyHPTDl7ZRh+i7t1512TMPrJNH34mP8YaVKmeP5IVnY9RzYJ0 raWw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWoVGIAKG0USHmRHb+aJy7RLFCqaO1lBGeQ0CACN2kPDaT91qd2r4T6SNPYbe5qfUPMkVePIjOU+xkQJw==@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz9OKrUmpsZCHp6ZoXXLnA32kogHWkmS5Cg0QCmSduCDvAT0qew 1TtQvPERGwJXyjQLEVs3Nm8AtSBK4iwgL4yE76mrMaO81TXPlXviMmljtHHthp8ssAVSPa4bJ/8 cs0+9Ig== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGEjcBsUTlo4/vVd9aOmfS85HeXK7VXkMsc2AM9X82gWAt19f8n9mk94PI8ByiZcVy2ayMJHM96hBY= X-Received: from pjbjx4.prod.google.com ([2002:a17:90b:46c4:b0:330:88c4:627]) (user=seanjc job=prod-delivery.src-stubby-dispatcher) by 2002:a17:90b:4c4a:b0:334:e020:2f16 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-334e0202f83mr1618309a91.11.1758807709301; Thu, 25 Sep 2025 06:41:49 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2025 06:41:42 -0700 In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20250827175247.83322-2-shivankg@amd.com> <20250827175247.83322-7-shivankg@amd.com> Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH kvm-next V11 4/7] KVM: guest_memfd: Use guest mem inodes instead of anonymous inodes From: Sean Christopherson To: David Hildenbrand Cc: Shivank Garg , Ackerley Tng , willy@infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, shuah@kernel.org, vbabka@suse.cz, brauner@kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, dsterba@suse.com, xiang@kernel.org, chao@kernel.org, jaegeuk@kernel.org, clm@fb.com, josef@toxicpanda.com, kent.overstreet@linux.dev, zbestahu@gmail.com, jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com, dhavale@google.com, lihongbo22@huawei.com, lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, rppt@kernel.org, surenb@google.com, mhocko@suse.com, ziy@nvidia.com, matthew.brost@intel.com, joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com, rakie.kim@sk.com, byungchul@sk.com, gourry@gourry.net, ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com, apopple@nvidia.com, tabba@google.com, paul@paul-moore.com, jmorris@namei.org, serge@hallyn.com, pvorel@suse.cz, bfoster@redhat.com, vannapurve@google.com, chao.gao@intel.com, bharata@amd.com, nikunj@amd.com, michael.day@amd.com, shdhiman@amd.com, yan.y.zhao@intel.com, Neeraj.Upadhyay@amd.com, thomas.lendacky@amd.com, michael.roth@amd.com, aik@amd.com, jgg@nvidia.com, kalyazin@amazon.com, peterx@redhat.com, jack@suse.cz, hch@infradead.org, cgzones@googlemail.com, ira.weiny@intel.com, rientjes@google.com, roypat@amazon.co.uk, chao.p.peng@intel.com, amit@infradead.org, ddutile@redhat.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com, ashish.kalra@amd.com, gshan@redhat.com, jgowans@amazon.com, pankaj.gupta@amd.com, papaluri@amd.com, yuzhao@google.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, quic_eberman@quicinc.com, linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Thu, Sep 25, 2025, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 25.09.25 13:44, Garg, Shivank wrote: > > On 9/25/2025 8:20 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > I did functional testing and it works fine. > > I can queue this instead. I guess I can reuse the patch description and add > Sean as author + add his SOB (if he agrees). Eh, Ackerley and Fuad did all the work. If I had provided feedback earlier, this would have been handled in a new version. If they are ok with the changes, I would prefer they remain co-authors. Regarding timing, how much do people care about getting this into 6.18 in particular? AFAICT, this hasn't gotten any coverage in -next, which makes me a little nervous.