linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
To: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] btrfs: tree-checker: use table values for stripe checks
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 20:29:25 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aa326600-b1e0-e3d4-38b5-1ef0b4527e8e@gmx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b7a7bb037ee8622784d94f39997d8ab1fbec892a.1627300614.git.dsterba@suse.com>



On 2021/7/26 下午8:15, David Sterba wrote:
> There are hardcoded values in several checks regarding chunks and stripe
> constraints. We have that defined in the raid table and ought to use it.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>

But one weird off-topics inlined below.

> ---
>   fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c | 17 +++++++++++------
>   1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c b/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
> index a8b2e0d2c025..ac9416cb4496 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
> @@ -873,13 +873,18 @@ int btrfs_check_chunk_valid(struct extent_buffer *leaf,
>   		}
>   	}
>
> -	if (unlikely((type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID10 && sub_stripes != 2) ||
> -		     (type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1 && num_stripes != 2) ||
> -		     (type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID5 && num_stripes < 2) ||
> -		     (type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID6 && num_stripes < 3) ||
> -		     (type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP && num_stripes != 2) ||
> +	if (unlikely((type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID10 &&
> +		      sub_stripes != btrfs_raid_array[BTRFS_RAID_RAID10].sub_stripes) ||
> +		     (type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1 &&
> +		      num_stripes != btrfs_raid_array[BTRFS_RAID_RAID1].devs_min) ||

We're adding support for single device RAID0, but there won't be
anything called single device RAID1 at all, right?

Thanks,
Qu

> +		     (type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID5 &&
> +		      num_stripes < btrfs_raid_array[BTRFS_RAID_RAID5].devs_min) ||
> +		     (type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID6 &&
> +		      num_stripes < btrfs_raid_array[BTRFS_RAID_RAID6].devs_min) ||
> +		     (type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP &&
> +		      num_stripes != btrfs_raid_array[BTRFS_RAID_DUP].dev_stripes) ||
>   		     ((type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_PROFILE_MASK) == 0 &&
> -		      num_stripes != 1))) {
> +		      num_stripes != btrfs_raid_array[BTRFS_RAID_SINGLE].dev_stripes))) {
>   		chunk_err(leaf, chunk, logical,
>   			"invalid num_stripes:sub_stripes %u:%u for profile %llu",
>   			num_stripes, sub_stripes,
>

  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-26 12:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-26 12:15 [PATCH 00/10] Misc small cleanups David Sterba
2021-07-26 12:15 ` [PATCH 01/10] btrfs: switch uptodate to bool in btrfs_writepage_endio_finish_ordered David Sterba
2021-07-26 12:23   ` Qu Wenruo
2021-07-26 12:15 ` [PATCH 02/10] btrfs: remove uptodate parameter from btrfs_dec_test_first_ordered_pending David Sterba
2021-07-26 12:24   ` Qu Wenruo
2021-07-26 12:15 ` [PATCH 03/10] btrfs: make btrfs_next_leaf static inline David Sterba
2021-07-26 12:25   ` Qu Wenruo
2021-07-26 12:15 ` [PATCH 04/10] btrfs: tree-checker: use table values for stripe checks David Sterba
2021-07-26 12:29   ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2021-07-26 14:47     ` David Sterba
2021-07-26 12:15 ` [PATCH 05/10] btrfs: tree-checker: add missing stripe checks for raid1c3/4 profiles David Sterba
2021-07-26 12:29   ` Qu Wenruo
2021-07-26 12:15 ` [PATCH 06/10] btrfs: uninline btrfs_bg_flags_to_raid_index David Sterba
2021-07-26 12:34   ` Qu Wenruo
2021-07-26 15:06     ` David Sterba
2021-07-26 12:15 ` [PATCH 07/10] btrfs: merge alloc_device helpers David Sterba
2021-07-26 12:35   ` Qu Wenruo
2021-07-26 12:15 ` [PATCH 08/10] btrfs: simplify data stripe calculation helpers David Sterba
2021-07-26 12:38   ` Qu Wenruo
2021-07-26 15:06     ` David Sterba
2021-07-26 22:23       ` Qu Wenruo
2021-07-27  8:39         ` David Sterba
2021-07-27  9:32           ` Qu Wenruo
2021-07-26 12:15 ` [PATCH 09/10] btrfs: constify and cleanup variables comparators David Sterba
2021-07-26 12:15 ` [PATCH 10/10] btrfs: add and use simple page/bio to inode/fs_info helpers David Sterba
2021-07-26 12:41   ` Qu Wenruo
2021-07-26 15:09     ` David Sterba
2021-07-26 22:26       ` Qu Wenruo
2021-07-27  8:45         ` David Sterba
2021-07-27  9:42           ` Qu Wenruo
2021-07-27 14:44             ` David Sterba
2021-07-27 15:03   ` [PATCH v2 " David Sterba
2021-07-28  0:12     ` Qu Wenruo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aa326600-b1e0-e3d4-38b5-1ef0b4527e8e@gmx.com \
    --to=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).