Linux Btrfs filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Kay Sievers" <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>
To: Roland <devzero@web.de>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: weird bash autocomplete issue
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 14:59:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ac3eb2510812170559o32e1942mbaac558dfc380f19@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <120501c96025$3bfca7c0$0301a8c0@bui.materna.com>

On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 09:45, Roland <devzero@web.de> wrote:
>> On Tue, 2008-12-16 at 22:41 +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 21:46,  <devzero@web.de> wrote:
>>> >> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 20:37, Roland <devzero@web.de> wrote:
>>> >> > i have come across a weird autocomplete issue i assume it is related
>>> >> > >> > to
>>> >> > btrfs.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > let`s have some dirs:
>>> >> >
>>> >> > /non-btrfs-mount
>>> >> >   ./linux
>>> >> >   ./testdir
>>> >> >
>>> >> > /brtfs-mount
>>> >> >   ./linux
>>> >> >   ./testdir
>>> >> >
>>> >> > now, if i do "cd t<tab>" in /non-btrfs-mount, "t" autocompletes to
>>> >> > >> > "testdir"
>>> >> > same for l<tab>inux - bash autocompletes as expected.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > now, the weird thing is, that on /btrfs-mount this behaves >> >
>>> >> > different.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > autocompletion for testdir works, but not for linux dir. weird.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > can someone reproduce this ?
>>> >>
>>> >> Open another shell, find the bash process pid of the first shell with:
>>> >>   ps afx
>>> >> and do:
>>> >>   strace -p <pid>
>>> >> Go back to the first shell, hit <tab>, and the trace should show
>>> >> what's going on. You see a significant difference there?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > ok, here we go (i hope i did not cut important parts).
>>> > i don`t see the real issue, but i did another interesting finding - see
>>> > > below
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > bad (cd l<tab>):
>>> >
>>> > open(".", O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK|O_LARGEFILE|O_DIRECTORY|O_CLOEXEC) = 3
>>> > fstat64(3, {st_dev=makedev(0, 19), st_ino=256, st_mode=S_IFDIR|0555, >
>>> > st_nlink=1, st_uid=0, st_gid=0, st_blksize=4096, st_blocks=8, > st_size=18,
>>> > st_atime=2008/12/16-21:32:38, st_mtime=2008/12/16-21:32:37, >
>>> > st_ctime=2008/12/16-21:32:37}) = 0
>>> > getdents64(3, {{d_ino=256, d_off=2, d_type=DT_DIR, d_reclen=24, >
>>> > d_name="."} {d_ino=256, d_off=2, d_type=DT_DIR, d_reclen=24, > d_name=".."}
>>> > {d_ino=257, d_off=3, d_type=DT_DIR, d_reclen=24, > d_name="test"}
>>> > {d_ino=258, d_off=9223372036854775807, d_type=DT_DIR, > d_reclen=32,
>>> > d_name="linux"}}, 4096) = 104
>>> > _llseek(3, 3, [3], SEEK_SET)            = 0
>>> > getdents64(3, {{d_ino=258, d_off=9223372036854775807, d_type=DT_DIR, >
>>> > d_reclen=32, d_name="linux"}}, 4096) = 32
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 22:26,  <devzero@web.de> wrote:
>>> > i assume it has something to do with the large value for d_off of the >
>>> > last dirent ?
>>>
>>> Looks like, 9223372036854775807 is just LLONG_MAX.
>>
>> I can not reproduce that (on openSUSE 11.1). I also don't see
>> the _llseek() calls.
>
> weird. no btrfs issue then !?
>
>>
>> open(".", O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK|O_DIRECTORY|O_CLOEXEC) = 3
>> fstat(3, {st_dev=makedev(0, 18), ...
>> getdents64(3, {
>>  {d_ino=260, d_off=2, d_type=DT_DIR, d_reclen=24, d_name="."}
>>  {d_ino=256, d_off=2, d_type=DT_DIR, d_reclen=24, d_name=".."}
>>  {d_ino=261, d_off=3, d_type=DT_REG, d_reclen=24, d_name="a"}
>>  {d_ino=262, d_off=4, d_type=DT_REG, d_reclen=24, d_name="b"}
>>  {d_ino=263, d_off=5, d_type=DT_REG, d_reclen=24, d_name="c"}
>>  {d_ino=264, d_off=6, d_type=DT_DIR, d_reclen=24, d_name="test"}
>>  {d_ino=265, d_off=9223372036854775807, d_type=DT_DIR, d_reclen=32,
>> d_name="linux"}
>> }, 4096) = 176
>> getdents64(3, {}, 4096)                 = 0
>> close(3)
>>
>> This is with today's git kernel and today's standalone btrfs unstable.
>>
>> You are using the distro kernel and compile the standalone btrfs module?
>
> yes.
> to be honest, i`m slightly newer than 11.1 (did zypper dup to latest factory
> some days ago)
>
> linux:~ # bash -version
> GNU bash, version 3.2.39(1)-release (i586-suse-linux-gnu)
> Copyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc.

That is still the same bash, the one you use is a 32bit version. Do
you run a 32 bit kernel too? I could try that on a 32 bit box then.

Thanks,
Kay

  reply	other threads:[~2008-12-17 13:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-16 20:46 weird bash autocomplete issue devzero
2008-12-16 21:41 ` Kay Sievers
2008-12-17  2:55   ` Kay Sievers
2008-12-17  8:45     ` Roland
2008-12-17 13:59       ` Kay Sievers [this message]
2008-12-17 14:17         ` Chris Mason
2008-12-17 14:46           ` Kay Sievers
2008-12-17 22:15             ` Kay Sievers
2008-12-17 23:58               ` Chris Mason
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-12-19  9:15 devzero
2008-12-19  0:59 devzero
2008-12-19  1:27 ` Kay Sievers
2008-12-17 14:40 devzero
2008-12-16 19:37 Roland
2008-12-16 19:47 ` Kay Sievers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ac3eb2510812170559o32e1942mbaac558dfc380f19@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
    --cc=devzero@web.de \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox