From: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
To: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] btrfs: Ensure btrfs_trim_fs can trim the whole fs
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 17:24:58 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ad0c28ec-947e-a1e1-af3c-c542a22cc1da@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180829051532.32005-3-wqu@suse.com>
On 29.08.2018 08:15, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> [BUG]
> fstrim on some btrfs only trims the unallocated space, not trimming any
> space in existing block groups.
>
> [CAUSE]
> Before fstrim_range passed to btrfs_trim_fs(), it get truncated to
> range [0, super->total_bytes).
> So later btrfs_trim_fs() will only be able to trim block groups in range
> [0, super->total_bytes).
>
> While for btrfs, any bytenr aligned to sector size is valid, since btrfs use
> its logical address space, there is nothing limiting the location where
> we put block groups.
>
> For btrfs with routine balance, it's quite easy to relocate all
> block groups and bytenr of block groups will start beyond super->total_bytes.
>
> In that case, btrfs will not trim existing block groups.
>
> [FIX]
> Just remove the truncation in btrfs_ioctl_fitrim(), so btrfs_trim_fs()
> can get the unmodified range, which is normally set to [0, U64_MAX].
>
> Reported-by: Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com>
> Fixes: f4c697e6406d ("btrfs: return EINVAL if start > total_bytes in fitrim ioctl")
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.0+
> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Seems legit,
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 10 +---------
> fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 11 +++++++----
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> index 7768f206196a..d1478d66c7a5 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> @@ -10851,21 +10851,13 @@ int btrfs_trim_fs(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, struct fstrim_range *range)
> u64 start;
> u64 end;
> u64 trimmed = 0;
> - u64 total_bytes = btrfs_super_total_bytes(fs_info->super_copy);
> u64 bg_failed = 0;
> u64 dev_failed = 0;
> int bg_ret = 0;
> int dev_ret = 0;
> int ret = 0;
>
> - /*
> - * try to trim all FS space, our block group may start from non-zero.
> - */
> - if (range->len == total_bytes)
> - cache = btrfs_lookup_first_block_group(fs_info, range->start);
> - else
> - cache = btrfs_lookup_block_group(fs_info, range->start);
> -
> + cache = btrfs_lookup_first_block_group(fs_info, range->start);
> for (; cache; cache = next_block_group(fs_info, cache)) {
> if (cache->key.objectid >= (range->start + range->len)) {
> btrfs_put_block_group(cache);
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
> index 63600dc2ac4c..8165a4bfa579 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
> @@ -491,7 +491,6 @@ static noinline int btrfs_ioctl_fitrim(struct file *file, void __user *arg)
> struct fstrim_range range;
> u64 minlen = ULLONG_MAX;
> u64 num_devices = 0;
> - u64 total_bytes = btrfs_super_total_bytes(fs_info->super_copy);
> int ret;
>
> if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
> @@ -515,11 +514,15 @@ static noinline int btrfs_ioctl_fitrim(struct file *file, void __user *arg)
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> if (copy_from_user(&range, arg, sizeof(range)))
> return -EFAULT;
> - if (range.start > total_bytes ||
> - range.len < fs_info->sb->s_blocksize)
> +
> + /*
> + * NOTE: Don't truncate the range using super->total_bytes.
> + * Bytenr of btrfs block group is in btrfs logical address space,
> + * which can be any sector size aligned bytenr in [0, U64_MAX].
> + */
> + if (range.len < fs_info->sb->s_blocksize)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - range.len = min(range.len, total_bytes - range.start);
> range.minlen = max(range.minlen, minlen);
> ret = btrfs_trim_fs(fs_info, &range);
> if (ret < 0)
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-29 18:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-29 5:15 [PATCH v3 0/2] btrfs: trim enhancement to allow btrfs really trim block groups Qu Wenruo
2018-08-29 5:15 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] btrfs: Enhance btrfs_trim_fs function to handle error better Qu Wenruo
2018-08-29 13:43 ` Nikolay Borisov
2018-08-29 13:53 ` Qu Wenruo
2018-08-29 14:40 ` Nikolay Borisov
2018-09-10 18:42 ` David Sterba
2018-08-29 5:15 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] btrfs: Ensure btrfs_trim_fs can trim the whole fs Qu Wenruo
2018-08-29 14:24 ` Nikolay Borisov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ad0c28ec-947e-a1e1-af3c-c542a22cc1da@suse.com \
--to=nborisov@suse.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wqu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).