linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@oracle.com>
To: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@oracle.com>
Cc: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	ngupta@vflare.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, adilger@Sun.COM, tytso@mit.edu,
	mfasheh@suse.com, Joel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>,
	matthew@wil.cx, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, jeremy@goop.org, JBeulich@novell.com,
	Kurt Hackel <kurt.hackel@oracle.com>,
	npiggin@suse.de, Dave Mccracken <dave.mccracken@oracle.com>,
	riel@redhat.com, avi@redhat.com,
	Konrad Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V3 0/8] Cleancache: overview
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 12:09:54 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <af8b0006-0eb7-468a-bbf8-36ecec9bec35@default> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <22A6238E-0BA4-4AB9-A4FA-28B206A47513@oracle.com>

> From: Andreas Dilger
> Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 12:34 PM
> To: Dan Magenheimer
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/8] Cleancache: overview
>=20
> On 2010-08-03, at 11:35, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
> > - The FS should be block-device-based (e.g. a ram-based FS
> >  such as tmpfs should not enable cleancache)
>=20
> When you say "block device based", does this exclude network
> filesystems?  It would seem cleancache, like fscache, is actually best
> suited to high-latency network filesystems.

I don't think it should exclude network FSs and agree cleancache
might be well-suited for them.  So if "block device based"
leaves out the possibility of network FSs, I am just
displaying my general ignorance of FSs and I/O, and
welcome clarification from FS developers.  What I really
meant is: Don't use cleancache for RAM-based filesystems.
=20
> > - To ensure coherency/correctness, inode numbers must be unique
> >  (e.g. no emulating 64-bit inode space on 32-bit inode numbers)
>=20
> Does it need to be restricted to inode numbers at all (i.e. can it use
> an opaque internal identifier like the NFS file handle)?  Disallowing
> cleancache on a filesystem that uses 64-bit (or larger) inodes on a 32-
> bit system reduces its usefulness.

True... Earlier versions of the patch did not use ino_t but
instead used an opaque always-64-bit-unsigned "object id".
The patch changed to use ino_t in response to Al Viro's comment
to "use sane types".

The <pool_id,object_id,pg_offset> triple must uniquely
and permanently (unless explicitly flushed) describe
exactly one page of FS data.  So if usefulness is increased
by changing object_id back to an explicit 64-bit value,
I'm happy to do that.  The only disadvantage I can
see is that 32-bit systems pass an extra 32 bits on
every call that may always be zero on most FSs.

Thanks,
Dan

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2010-08-03 19:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20100621231809.GA11111@ca-server1.us.oracle.com>
2010-06-22  6:40 ` [PATCH V3 0/8] Cleancache: overview Christoph Hellwig
2010-07-06 20:58 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-07-23  7:36 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-07-23  8:16   ` Minchan Kim
2010-07-23 14:56     ` Nitin Gupta
2010-07-23  8:17   ` Minchan Kim
2010-07-23 13:58   ` Dan Magenheimer
2010-07-23 14:04     ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-07-23 14:44       ` Dan Magenheimer
2010-07-23 15:05         ` Nitin Gupta
2010-07-23 17:43           ` Dan Magenheimer
2010-07-23 17:37         ` Dan Magenheimer
2010-07-23 18:36           ` Nitin Gupta
2010-07-23 21:17         ` Dan Magenheimer
2010-08-03 16:22           ` Boaz Harrosh
2010-08-03 17:35             ` Dan Magenheimer
2010-08-03 18:34               ` Andreas Dilger
2010-08-03 19:09                 ` Dan Magenheimer [this message]
2010-06-21 23:18 Dan Magenheimer
     [not found] <20100621231809.GA11111@ca-server1.us.oracle.com4C49468B.40307@vflare.org>

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=af8b0006-0eb7-468a-bbf8-36ecec9bec35@default \
    --to=dan.magenheimer@oracle.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@novell.com \
    --cc=adilger@Sun.COM \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andreas.dilger@oracle.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=bharrosh@panasas.com \
    --cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=dave.mccracken@oracle.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=joel.becker@oracle.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=kurt.hackel@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=matthew@wil.cx \
    --cc=mfasheh@suse.com \
    --cc=ngupta@vflare.org \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).