From: "Martin Mlynář" <nextsux@gmail.com>
To: Hans van Kranenburg <hans.van.kranenburg@mendix.com>,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Root volume (ID 5) in deleting state
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 21:50:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <af9179d8-cf9e-7eef-3150-477bf3a55ff8@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a103e413-d922-9c79-0075-1ce00a3cd7de@mendix.com>
On 13.2.2017 21:03, Hans van Kranenburg wrote:
> On 02/13/2017 12:26 PM, Martin Mlynář wrote:
>> I've currently run into strange problem with BTRFS. I'm using it as my
>> daily driver as root FS. Nothing complicated, just few subvolumes and
>> incremental backups using btrbk.
>>
>> Now I've noticed that my btrfs root volume (absolute top, ID 5) is in
>> "deleting" state. As I've done some testing and googling it seems that
>> this should not be possible.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> # btrfs sub list -ad /mnt/btrfs_root/
>> ID 5 gen 257505 top level 0 path <FS_TREE>/DELETED
> I have heard rumours that this is actually a bug in the output of sub
> list itself.
>
> What's the version of your btrfs-progs? (output of `btrfs version`)
Sorry, I've lost this part:
$ btrfs version
btrfs-progs v4.9
>
>> # mount | grep btr
>> /dev/mapper/vg0-btrfsroot on / type btrfs
>> (rw,noatime,nodatasum,nodatacow,ssd,discard,space_cache,subvolid=1339,subvol=/rootfs)
>>
>> /dev/mapper/vg0-btrfsroot on /mnt/btrfs_root type btrfs
>> (rw,noatime,nodatasum,nodatacow,ssd,discard,space_cache,subvolid=5,subvol=/)
> The rumour was that it had something to do with using space_cache=v2,
> which this example does not confirm.
It looks you're right!
On a different machine:
# btrfs sub list / | grep -v lxc
ID 327 gen 1959587 top level 5 path mnt/reaver
ID 498 gen 593655 top level 5 path var/lib/machines
# btrfs sub list / -d | wc -l
0
# btrfs version
btrfs-progs v4.8.2
# uname -a
Linux nxserver 4.8.6-1-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Mon Oct 31 18:51:30 CET 2016
x86_64 GNU/Linux
# mount | grep btrfs
/dev/vda1 on / type btrfs
(rw,relatime,nodatasum,nodatacow,space_cache,subvolid=5,subvol=/)
Then I've upgraded this machine and:
# btrfs sub list / | grep -v lxc
ID 327 gen 1959587 top level 5 path mnt/reaver
ID 498 gen 593655 top level 5 path var/lib/machines
# btrfs sub list / -d | wc -l
1
# btrfs sub list / -d
ID 5 gen 2186037 top level 0 path DELETED <======
1
# btrfs version
btrfs-progs v4.9
# uname -a
Linux nxserver 4.9.8-1-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Mon Feb 6 12:59:40 CET 2017
x86_64 GNU/Linux
# mount | grep btrfs
/dev/vda1 on / type btrfs
(rw,relatime,nodatasum,nodatacow,space_cache,subvolid=5,subvol=/)
>
>> # uname -a
>> Linux interceptor 4.9.6-1-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Thu Jan 26 09:22:26 CET
>> 2017 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>>
>> # btrfs fi show /
>> Label: none uuid: 859dec5c-850c-4660-ad99-bc87456aa309
>> Total devices 1 FS bytes used 132.89GiB
>> devid 1 size 200.00GiB used 200.00GiB path /dev/mapper/vg0-btrfsroot
> As a side note, all of your disk space is allocated (200GiB of 200GiB).
>
> Even while there's still 70GiB of free space scattered around inside,
> this might lead to out-of-space issues, depending on how badly
> fragmented that free space is.
I have not noticed this at all!
# btrfs fi show /
Label: none uuid: 859dec5c-850c-4660-ad99-bc87456aa309
Total devices 1 FS bytes used 134.23GiB
devid 1 size 200.00GiB used 200.00GiB path /dev/mapper/vg0-btrfsroot
# btrfs fi df /
Data, single: total=195.96GiB, used=131.58GiB
System, single: total=3.00MiB, used=48.00KiB
Metadata, single: total=4.03GiB, used=2.64GiB
GlobalReserve, single: total=512.00MiB, used=0.00B
After btrfs defrag there is no difference. btrfs fi show says still
200/200. I'll try to play with it.
>
--
Martin Mlynář
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-13 20:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-13 11:26 Root volume (ID 5) in deleting state Martin Mlynář
2017-02-13 20:03 ` Hans van Kranenburg
2017-02-13 20:50 ` Martin Mlynář [this message]
2017-02-13 23:04 ` Hans van Kranenburg
2017-02-14 10:58 ` Martin Mlynář
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=af9179d8-cf9e-7eef-3150-477bf3a55ff8@gmail.com \
--to=nextsux@gmail.com \
--cc=hans.van.kranenburg@mendix.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).