From: Zorro Lang <zlang@kernel.org>
To: Disha Goel <disgoel@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
ritesh.list@gmail.com, ojaswin@linux.ibm.com, djwong@kernel.org,
fdmanana@kernel.org, quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com,
anajain.sg@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] btrfs/291: fix state transition logic and add size requirement
Date: Mon, 11 May 2026 23:20:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <agHogPMQGKqAHkIT@zlang-mailbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260508144701.68561-2-disgoel@linux.ibm.com>
On Fri, May 08, 2026 at 08:17:01PM +0530, Disha Goel wrote:
> This patch fixes two issues in btrfs/291:
>
> 1. Add dynamic LOGWRITES_DEV size requirement based on SCRATCH_DEV
> The test creates LVM snapshots at each FUA point during replay,
> requiring significant space. Calculate the required size as 120%
> of SCRATCH_DEV size (adding 20% overhead for LVM snapshots and
> metadata) to ensure the test works regardless of SCRATCH_DEV size.
>
> 2. Fix state transition logic for verity enablement
> The original test assumed orphan items would always be created
> during verity enablement (state 0->1 transition). However, in
> some cases verity completes without creating orphan items,
> causing the test to fail with "expected to reach verity done state".
>
> Fix by transitioning to state 1 when either orphan items exist
> OR merkle items appear, handling both verity enablement paths.
> Also improve state 1 validation to only check for cleared merkle
> items when measurement actually fails.
>
> The test now correctly handles verity enablement with or without
> orphan items while maintaining crash consistency validation, and
> works with any SCRATCH_DEV size.
>
> Suggested-by: Anand Jain <anajain.sg@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Disha Goel <disgoel@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> v2 -> v3:
> - Calculate LOGWRITES_DEV size requirement dynamically based on SCRATCH_DEV
> size (120% of SCRATCH_DEV) instead of fixed 9GB
> - This fixes test failures when SCRATCH_DEV > 9GB, as reported by Anand
>
> tests/btrfs/291 | 19 ++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/291 b/tests/btrfs/291
> index 122aeaa5..e5ea4b50 100755
> --- a/tests/btrfs/291
> +++ b/tests/btrfs/291
> @@ -36,7 +36,9 @@ _cleanup()
> _require_scratch
> _require_test
> _require_loop
> -_require_log_writes
> +scratch_size=$(_get_device_size $SCRATCH_DEV)
> +required_log_size=$((scratch_size * 120 / 100))
> +_require_log_writes_sized $required_log_size
OK, more 20% space makes sense.
> _require_dm_target snapshot
> _require_command $LVM_PROG lvm
> _require_scratch_verity
> @@ -129,9 +131,14 @@ do
> _udev_wait /dev/mapper/$vgname-$snapname
>
> orphan=$(count_item $snap_dev ORPHAN)
> - [ $state -eq 0 ] && [ $orphan -gt 0 ] && state=1
> -
> pre_mount=$(count_merkle_items $snap_dev)
> +
> + if [ $state -eq 0 ]; then
> + if [ $orphan -gt 0 ] || [ $pre_mount -gt 0 ]; then
Hm, this's this exception you metioned in commit log, so if we find
merkle items, no matter where's it from, we need to deal with them
later, so set state to 1.
> + state=1
> + fi
> + fi
> +
> _mount $snap_dev $SCRATCH_MNT || _fail "mount failed at entry $cur"
> fsverity measure $SCRATCH_MNT/fsv >>$seqres.full 2>&1
> measured=$?
> @@ -143,8 +150,10 @@ do
> echo "entry: $cur, state: $state, orphan: $orphan, pre_mount: $pre_mount, post_mount: $post_mount" >> $seqres.full
>
> if [ $state -eq 1 ]; then
> - [ $post_mount -eq 0 ] || \
> - _fail "mount failed to clear under-construction merkle items pre: $pre_mount, post: $post_mount at entry $cur";
> + if [ $measured -ne 0 ]; then
> + [ $post_mount -eq 0 ] || \
OK, fix same situation you metioned.
From the code logic, this change is good to me.
Reviewed-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@kernel.org>
I just have one more question, this case is written in 2021, now it's 2026. It
still fails on latest test with kernel 7.1.0-0.rc2 and btrfs-progs-6.19.1-1.fc45,
no matter with or without this patch.
Is that expected by btrfs? Is there a known kernel commit uncovered by this case?
Thanks,
Zorro
# ./check btrfs/291
FSTYP -- btrfs
PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 localhost 7.1.0-0.rc2.260505ga293ec25d59dd.17.fc45.x86_64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Tue May 5 17:39:29 UTC 2026
MKFS_OPTIONS -- /dev/vdd
MOUNT_OPTIONS -- -o context=system_u:object_r:root_t:s0 /dev/vdd /mnt/scratch
btrfs/291 _check_btrfs_filesystem: filesystem on /dev/vdd is inconsistent
(see /root/xfstests/results//btrfs/291.full for details)
Ran: btrfs/291
Failures: btrfs/291
Failed 1 of 1 tests
Thanks,
Zorro
> + _fail "mount failed to clear under-construction merkle items pre: $pre_mount, post: $post_mount at entry $cur";
> + fi
> fi
> if [ $state -eq 2 ]; then
> [ $pre_mount -gt 0 ] || \
> --
> 2.45.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-11 15:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-08 14:47 [PATCH v3 1/2] common/dmlogwrites: add _require_log_writes_sized helper Disha Goel
2026-05-08 14:47 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] btrfs/291: fix state transition logic and add size requirement Disha Goel
2026-05-11 15:20 ` Zorro Lang [this message]
2026-05-11 14:31 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] common/dmlogwrites: add _require_log_writes_sized helper Zorro Lang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=agHogPMQGKqAHkIT@zlang-mailbox \
--to=zlang@kernel.org \
--cc=anajain.sg@gmail.com \
--cc=disgoel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=fdmanana@kernel.org \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox