From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAE7840B6F0; Tue, 12 May 2026 05:38:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778564326; cv=none; b=YDrEVODsJK3df1SPChBCRA5en0ZSgG0w5Xxbc5Sip563hcYu3faEekprQ0Fmr3bo0rTtlDAxTOIUDMFCCjMe/b6edCkPJ/U4xdjWCanPP/9FHPCYJ1lq9CDhhfScz2TzXecUv6NWYQCxFRvIg9Bq0cqfQ1KDrV1idr8L3jIbhto= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778564326; c=relaxed/simple; bh=R8pYP2LSzOSiv8SYpUI39kMpvcXSgkDMIm92MTpZSKQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=QOyESpGRbiCNOuKyxOpfUlJE/nQhOgbo6QS5shK+NsX116zFfJFm/vbpuhEEVQgd4xfEoN8CPvimbSDV4IhSdz8LGfc5SK7/UHwzsjAMBo8L/r1dp2n1s0KSMJFrTENg4Kzq9rNJTRk/w3LB0J4u8mtQF2qKMK4zxQKEzau53m0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=bombadil.srs.infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=fDX9QKEy; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=bombadil.srs.infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="fDX9QKEy" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=/ZDVCIMAZqs68wwcqWVhh5eJ0cpVPKFSFv2jHmDF8DU=; b=fDX9QKEyVxN/aVQij/SAEAVzh7 p3Xzo8TxDNzvW7xc8QvsWklkirByJ+tG3rXLE7ugQRg9yAkq1mI0lqUlph64n5brxluQyIIzg33ta XPJf6Ag8iEFCR7VypSs0JxUJfXBG6c8ia6rFUQSnIWjnNocNTwY3gf2bLv04pcFPzddXyj0pbZhZc Op5SPrgv2gKNxc0Bl+1+1EglEDkxScP+ZTam64lYUHLuImC5BvXupIaqen6tHVMDXbA4OSBDG/w4H 7BX1r5FYXWtpg12YkrIn/d8wNOMqdEuSjvy+c/bWh79oG+DQMzavOgLb+3XC8s/+D+BYgxp2H3ZsR Acqu7TfA==; Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wMfpG-0000000Ffdj-2Si0; Tue, 12 May 2026 05:38:38 +0000 Date: Mon, 11 May 2026 22:38:38 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Anand Jain Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs@vger.kernel.org, amir73il@gmail.com, zlang@redhat.com, =?iso-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9?= Almeida Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/9] fstests: verify fanotify isolation on cloned filesystems Message-ID: References: <5857d9f33de7f0ea8ddd12c36334c6463c0bfe0f.1777357321.git.asj@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5857d9f33de7f0ea8ddd12c36334c6463c0bfe0f.1777357321.git.asj@kernel.org> X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html On Tue, Apr 28, 2026 at 02:42:54PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote: > Verify that fanotify events are correctly routed to the appropriate > watcher when cloned filesystems are mounted. > Helps verify kernel's event notification distinguishes between devices > sharing the same FSID/UUID. Do these tests pass with all major file systems? Or does this reproduce the previous btrfs issues in this area?