From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:42444 "EHLO plane.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752025AbaBNAPx (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Feb 2014 19:15:53 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WE6Rc-00073l-Ck for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 01:15:52 +0100 Received: from 37-4-166-128-dynip.superkabel.de ([37.4.166.128]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 01:15:52 +0100 Received: from hurikhan77+btrfs by 37-4-166-128-dynip.superkabel.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 01:15:52 +0100 To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org From: Kai Krakow Subject: Re: Possible to wait for snapshot deletion? Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 01:12:58 +0100 Message-ID: References: <4127554.quurJk0k5Q@vfr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Garry T. Williams schrieb: > On 2-13-14 20:02:43 Kai Krakow wrote: >> Is it technically possible to wait for a snapshot completely purged >> from disk? I imagine an option like "--wait" for btrfs delete >> subvolume. > > This may be what you're looking for: > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg29833.html > Looks fantastic. Can I vote to get it into official sources? ;-) -- Replies to list only preferred.