From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC]: mutex: adaptive spin Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 13:50:54 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: References: <87r63ljzox.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> <20090103191706.GA2002@parisc-linux.org> <1231093310.27690.5.camel@twins> <20090104184103.GE2002@parisc-linux.org> <1231242031.11687.97.camel@twins> <20090106121052.GA27232@elte.hu> <4963584A.4090805@novell.com> <20090106131643.GA15228@elte.hu> <1231248041.11687.107.camel@twins> <49636799.1010109@novell.com> <20090106214229.GD6741@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1231278275.11687.111.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Gregory Haskins , Ingo Molnar , Matthew Wilcox , Andi Kleen , Chris Mason , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel , linux-btrfs , Thomas Gleixner , Steven Rostedt , Nick Piggin , Peter Morreale , Sven Dietrich To: Peter Zijlstra Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1231278275.11687.111.camel@twins> List-ID: On Tue, 6 Jan 2009, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > With Linus' mutex_spin_or_schedule() function the whole - keeping > owner's task_struct alive issue goes away,.. now if only the thing would > boot... Can you post the patch, so that we can see if we can find some silly error that we can ridicule you over? Linus "always willing to 'help'" Torvalds