From: "Lukáš Czerner" <lczerner@redhat.com>
To: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Generic test for file fsync after moving files across directories
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 10:40:54 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1502271027140.2188@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1424980394-12592-1-git-send-email-fdmanana@suse.com>
On Thu, 26 Feb 2015, Filipe Manana wrote:
> Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 19:53:14 +0000
> From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
> To: fstests@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] Generic test for file fsync after moving files across
> directories
>
> Test file fsync after moving one file between directories and fsyncing the
> old parent directory before fsyncing the file. Verify that after a crash the
> file data we fsynced is available.
>
> This test is motivated by an issue discovered in btrfs which caused the file
> data to be lost (despite fsync returning success to user space). That btrfs
> bug is fixed by the following linux kernel patch:
>
> Btrfs: fix data loss in the fast fsync path
Hi,
some comments below.
>
> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
> ---
> tests/generic/067 | 113 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tests/generic/067.out | 11 +++++
> tests/generic/group | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 125 insertions(+)
> create mode 100755 tests/generic/067
> create mode 100644 tests/generic/067.out
>
> diff --git a/tests/generic/067 b/tests/generic/067
> new file mode 100755
> index 0000000..90f26b2
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/generic/067
> @@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
> +#! /bin/bash
> +# FS QA Test No. 067
> +#
> +# Test file fsync after moving one file between directories and fsyncing the
> +# old parent directory before fsyncing the file. Verify that after a crash the
> +# file data we fsynced is available.
> +#
> +# This test is motivated by an issue discovered in btrfs which caused the file
> +# data to be lost (despite fsync returning success to user space). That btrfs
> +# bug was fixed by the following linux kernel patch:
> +#
> +# Btrfs: fix data loss in the fast fsync path
> +#
> +#-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> +# Copyright (C) 2015 SUSE Linux Products GmbH. All Rights Reserved.
> +# Author: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
> +#
> +# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> +# modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
> +# published by the Free Software Foundation.
> +#
> +# This program is distributed in the hope that it would be useful,
> +# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> +# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
> +# GNU General Public License for more details.
> +#
> +# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
> +# along with this program; if not, write the Free Software Foundation,
> +# Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
> +#-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> +#
> +
> +seq=`basename $0`
> +seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq
> +echo "QA output created by $seq"
> +
> +here=`pwd`
> +tmp=/tmp/$$
> +status=1 # failure is the default!
> +
> +_cleanup()
> +{
> + _cleanup_flakey
> + rm -f $tmp.*
> +}
> +trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15
> +
> +# get standard environment, filters and checks
> +. ./common/rc
> +. ./common/filter
> +. ./common/dmflakey
> +
> +# real QA test starts here
> +_supported_fs generic
> +_supported_os Linux
> +_need_to_be_root
> +_require_scratch
> +_require_dm_flakey
> +_require_metadata_journaling $SCRATCH_DEV
> +
> +rm -f $seqres.full
> +
> +_scratch_mkfs >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> +_init_flakey
> +_mount_flakey
> +
> +# Create our main test file 'foo', the one we check for data loss.
> +# By doing an fsync against our file, it makes btrfs clear the 'needs_full_sync'
> +# bit from its flags (btrfs inode specific flags).
I am not sure we need that last sentence, it's btrfs specific and I am sure
it has been already explained in detail in the btrfs commit
description.
> +$XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -S 0xaa 0 8K" \
> + -c "fsync" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io
> +
> +# Now create one other file and 2 directories. We will move this second file
> +# from one directory to the other later because it forces btrfs to commit its
> +# currently open transaction if we fsync the old parent directory. This is
> +# necessary to trigger the data loss bug that affected btrfs.
> +mkdir $SCRATCH_MNT/testdir_1
> +touch $SCRATCH_MNT/testdir_1/bar
> +mkdir $SCRATCH_MNT/testdir_2
> +
> +# Make sure everything is durably persisted.
> +sync
> +
> +# Write more 8Kb of data to our file.
> +$XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite -S 0xbb 8K 8K" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io
> +
> +# Move our 'bar' file into a new directory.
> +mv $SCRATCH_MNT/testdir_1/bar $SCRATCH_MNT/testdir_2/bar
> +
> +# Fsync our first directory. Because it had a file moved into some other
> +# directory, this made btrfs commit the currently open transaction. This is
> +# a condition necessary to trigger the data loss bug.
> +$XFS_IO_PROG -c "fsync" $SCRATCH_MNT/testdir_1
> +
> +# Now fsync our main test file. If the fsync succeeds, we expect the 8Kb of
> +# data we wrote previously to be persisted and available if a crash happens.
> +# This did not happen with btrfs, because of the transaction commit that
> +# happened when we fsynced the parent directory.
> +$XFS_IO_PROG -c "fsync" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo
Ok, so from the description of the test I though that the data loss
will happen on the file we're moving, but apparently its about a
different unrelated file.
Otherwise the test looks fine.
Reviewed-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Thanks!
-Lukas
> +
> +# Simulate a crash/power loss.
> +_load_flakey_table $FLAKEY_DROP_WRITES
> +_unmount_flakey
> +
> +_load_flakey_table $FLAKEY_ALLOW_WRITES
> +_mount_flakey
> +
> +# Now check that all data we wrote before are available.
> +echo "File content after log replay:"
> +od -t x1 $SCRATCH_MNT/foo
> +
> +status=0
> +exit
> diff --git a/tests/generic/067.out b/tests/generic/067.out
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..f30f6ef
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/generic/067.out
> @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
> +QA output created by 067
> +wrote 8192/8192 bytes at offset 0
> +XXX Bytes, X ops; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY/sec and XXX ops/sec)
> +wrote 8192/8192 bytes at offset 8192
> +XXX Bytes, X ops; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY/sec and XXX ops/sec)
> +File content after log replay:
> +0000000 aa aa aa aa aa aa aa aa aa aa aa aa aa aa aa aa
> +*
> +0020000 bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb
> +*
> +0040000
> diff --git a/tests/generic/group b/tests/generic/group
> index e5db772..05cc6a9 100644
> --- a/tests/generic/group
> +++ b/tests/generic/group
> @@ -69,6 +69,7 @@
> 064 auto quick prealloc
> 065 metadata auto quick
> 066 metadata auto quick
> +067 metadata auto quick
> 068 other auto freeze dangerous stress
> 069 rw udf auto quick
> 070 attr udf auto quick stress
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-27 9:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-26 19:53 [PATCH] Generic test for file fsync after moving files across directories Filipe Manana
2015-02-27 9:40 ` Lukáš Czerner [this message]
2015-02-27 10:54 ` Filipe David Manana
2015-02-27 11:06 ` Lukáš Czerner
2015-02-27 11:17 ` [PATCH v2] " Filipe Manana
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.1502271027140.2188@localhost.localdomain \
--to=lczerner@redhat.com \
--cc=fdmanana@suse.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).