From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>, Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>,
Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] btrfs: fix folio lock leak in writepage_delalloc() for folios dirtied behind btrfs' back
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2026 13:57:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <amC-J7yzwk4Z5tHW@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f12f70e5-d84d-4a9f-ac94-693be4c863ac@linux.ibm.com>
On Wed, Jul 22, 2026 at 11:29:36AM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> * 4. Thread B loops sync_file_range(WRITE|WAIT) on the target file.
> * Whenever a full clean cycle (clear_page_dirty_for_io(),
> * writeback, bits cleared) completes inside thread A's
> * submission->completion window, the completion-time
> * set_page_dirty_lock() hits a *clean* folio: filemap_dirty_folio()
> * sets only the folio flag and the xarray tag - no btrfs subpage
> * dirty bit, no delalloc reservation. See the 20-year-old comment
> * above bio_set_pages_dirty() in block/bio.c describing exactly
> * this ("other code (eg, flusher threads) could clean the pages").
There's your problem. filemap_dirty_folio() documents that btrfs is
doing it wrongly:
* Filesystems which do not use buffer heads should call this function
* from their dirty_folio address space operation. It ignores the
* contents of folio_get_private(), so if the filesystem marks individual
* blocks as dirty, the filesystem should handle that itself.
fs/btrfs/inode.c: .dirty_folio = filemap_dirty_folio,
so btrfs should have its own btrfs_dirty_folio() which does whatever
metadata updates it needs to and then call filemap_dirty_folio() to
take care of the page cache business. See iomap_dirty_folio() as
an example, but many other filesystems also do this.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-22 13:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-21 19:11 7.2-rc1 regression Folio lock leak in writepage_delalloc() Christian Borntraeger
2026-07-21 19:11 ` [PATCH/RFC] btrfs: fix folio lock leak in writepage_delalloc() for folios dirtied behind btrfs' back Christian Borntraeger
2026-07-21 21:07 ` Qu Wenruo
2026-07-22 8:35 ` Christian Borntraeger
2026-07-22 8:59 ` Qu Wenruo
2026-07-22 9:29 ` Christian Borntraeger
2026-07-22 9:35 ` Qu Wenruo
2026-07-22 10:40 ` Christian Borntraeger
2026-07-22 12:57 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2026-07-23 0:42 ` Qu Wenruo
2026-07-23 12:00 ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-07-23 22:40 ` Qu Wenruo
2026-07-25 6:26 ` Boris Burkov
2026-07-27 8:11 ` Christian Borntraeger
2026-07-27 8:41 ` Qu Wenruo
2026-07-27 12:59 ` Christian Borntraeger
2026-07-22 7:21 ` 7.2-rc1 regression Folio lock leak in writepage_delalloc() Qu Wenruo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=amC-J7yzwk4Z5tHW@casper.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
--cc=wqu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox