From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Lauri Gates <lauri.gates@gmail.com>
Cc: Dave Chinner <dgc@kernel.org>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>,
Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Concurrent FIEMAP on reflinked files serialises on the AGF buffer lock
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2026 07:20:04 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <au3wJNbRPXQZG5Op@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261106122355.16885-1-lauri.gates@gmail.com>
On Fri, Nov 06, 2026 at 02:23:55PM +0200, Lauri Gates wrote:
> Mirroring XFS_DIFLAG2_REFLINK, the flag would mean "may have shared
> extents", which is all a du tool needs to decide whether to look
> closer. If it helps, I can write the patch.
Please do. The main question are:
- do we want it in fileattr_get or as a STATX_ATTR_ in statx.
- how do we make the query reliable, and do we even need to?
Besides xfs, btrfs and ocfs2 also support reflinks, and nfs (and maybe
cifs?) can export the semanics remotely. So we really need a way
to indicate if the file system could support reflinks to start with,
and then one that the file could, so we probably need two bits
next parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-06 15:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <auudz7Iwm2MrNA-b@dread>
[not found] ` <20261106122355.16885-1-lauri.gates@gmail.com>
2026-11-06 15:20 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2026-11-06 20:40 ` Concurrent FIEMAP on reflinked files serialises on the AGF buffer lock Lauri Gates
2026-11-12 20:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=au3wJNbRPXQZG5Op@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=christian@brauner.io \
--cc=dgc@kernel.org \
--cc=lauri.gates@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox