From: Kai Krakow <hurikhan77+btrfs@gmail.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/5] BTRFS hot relocation support
Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 23:58:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b0ao5a-81c.ln1@hurikhan.ath.cx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 518973B2.4070308@gmail.com
Gabriel de Perthuis <g2p.code@gmail.com> schrieb:
>>> How will it compare to bcache? I'm currently thinking about buying an
>>> SSD but bcache requires some efforts in migrating the storage to use.
>>> And after all those hassles I am even not sure if it would work easily
>>> with a dracut generated initramfs.
>
>> On the side note: dm-cache, which is already in-kernel, do not need to
>> reformat backing storage.
>
> On the other hand dm-cache is somewhat complex to assemble, and letting
> the system automount the unsynchronised backing device is a recipe for
> data loss.
Yes, that was my first impression, too, after reading of how it works. How
safe is bcache on that matter?
> Anyway, here's a shameless plug for a tool that converts to bcache
> in-place: https://github.com/g2p/blocks#bcache-conversion
Did I say: I love your shameless plugs? ;-)
I've read the docs for this tool with interest. Still I do not feel very
comfortable with converting my storage for some unknown outcome. Sure, I can
take backups (and by any means: I will). But it takes time: backup, try,
restore, try again, maybe restore... I don't want to find out that it was
all useless because it's just not ready to boot a multi-device btrfs through
dracut. So you see, the point is: Will that work? I didn't see any docs
answering my questions.
Of course, if it would work I'd happily contribute documentation to your
project.
Regards,
Kai
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-07 22:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-06 8:53 [RFC 0/5] BTRFS hot relocation support zwu.kernel
2013-05-06 8:53 ` [RFC 1/5] vfs: add one list_head field zwu.kernel
2013-05-06 8:53 ` [RFC 2/5] btrfs: add one new block group zwu.kernel
2013-05-06 8:53 ` [RFC 3/5] btrfs: add one hot relocation kthread zwu.kernel
2013-05-06 8:53 ` [RFC 4/5] procfs: add three proc interfaces zwu.kernel
2013-05-06 8:53 ` [RFC 5/5] btrfs: add hot relocation support zwu.kernel
2013-05-06 20:36 ` [RFC 0/5] BTRFS " Kai Krakow
2013-05-07 5:17 ` Tomasz Torcz
2013-05-07 21:17 ` Kai Krakow
2013-05-07 21:35 ` Gabriel de Perthuis
2013-05-07 21:58 ` Kai Krakow [this message]
2013-05-07 22:27 ` Gabriel de Perthuis
2013-05-08 23:13 ` Zhi Yong Wu
2013-05-09 6:30 ` Stefan Behrens
2013-05-09 6:42 ` Zhi Yong Wu
2013-05-09 7:41 ` Stefan Behrens
2013-05-09 7:49 ` Zhi Yong Wu
2013-05-09 7:28 ` Zheng Liu
2013-05-09 6:56 ` Roger Binns
2013-05-19 10:41 ` Martin Steigerwald
2013-05-19 13:43 ` Zhi Yong Wu
2013-05-19 14:42 ` Martin Steigerwald
2013-05-19 13:46 ` Zhi Yong Wu
2013-05-09 7:17 ` Gabriel de Perthuis
2013-05-14 15:24 ` Zhi Yong Wu
2013-05-16 7:12 ` Kai Krakow
2013-05-17 7:23 ` Zhi Yong Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b0ao5a-81c.ln1@hurikhan.ath.cx \
--to=hurikhan77+btrfs@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox