From: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
To: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>, Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] btrfs: make btrfs module init/exit match their sequence
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2022 08:10:01 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b135361d-58ae-7bf9-fa3b-d11d5d5faaf9@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <96de6625-fb23-b44b-b4ab-9aae52ab70c3@gmx.com>
>>>>> +static bool mod_init_result[ARRAY_SIZE(mod_init_seq)];
>>>>
>>>> Why not move bool mod_init_result into the (non-const) struct
>>>> init_sequence?
>>
>> Any comment on this suggestion?
>
> Why you want to change the init_sequence array into non-const then?
We can remove an isolated array mod_init_result to contain the result.
Instead struct init_sequence can have results as a member.
>>>>> + /*
>>>>> + * If we call exit_btrfs_fs() it would cause section mismatch.
>>>>> + * As init_btrfs_fs() belongs to .init.text, while
>>>>> exit_btrfs_fs()
>>>>> + * belongs to .exit.text.
>>>>> + */
>>>> Why not move it into a helper that can be called at both exit and
>>>> init?
>>>
>>> IIRC the last time I went the helper path, it caused section mismatch
>>> again, as all __init/__exit functions can only call functions inside
>>> .init/.exit.text.
>>>
>>> Thus the helper way won't solve it.
>>
>> Really? Maybe it was something else because, I see it as working.
>> As below.
>
> You removed __exit, which removed the section type check.
Yeah. We don't need __exit return type in the helper function. It does
not make sense in the helper function.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-14 0:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-12 9:22 [PATCH v2] btrfs: make btrfs module init/exit match their sequence Qu Wenruo
2022-10-13 6:03 ` Anand Jain
2022-10-13 6:44 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-10-13 13:46 ` Anand Jain
2022-10-13 23:14 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-10-14 0:10 ` Anand Jain [this message]
2022-10-14 0:17 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-10-14 12:08 ` David Sterba
2022-10-13 9:14 ` Nikolay Borisov
2022-10-13 9:22 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-10-13 9:29 ` Nikolay Borisov
2022-10-13 9:51 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-10-17 18:07 ` David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b135361d-58ae-7bf9-fa3b-d11d5d5faaf9@oracle.com \
--to=anand.jain@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
--cc=wqu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).