From: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
To: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: btrfs_shrink_device should call commit transaction
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2018 19:27:01 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b14154e5-9327-b106-97a9-f05af363387d@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3769497d-8aa7-c7d6-eaeb-3f8cd3c88bb6@suse.com>
On 07/30/2018 10:18 PM, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>
>
> On 25.07.2018 16:27, Anand Jain wrote:
>> test case btrfs/164 reported UAF..
>>
>> [ 6712.084324] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
>> ::
>> [ 6712.195423] btrfs_update_commit_device_size+0x75/0xf0 [btrfs]
>> [ 6712.201424] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x57d/0xa90 [btrfs]
>> [ 6712.206999] btrfs_rm_device+0x627/0x850 [btrfs]
>> [ 6712.211800] btrfs_ioctl+0x2b03/0x3120 [btrfs]
>> ::
>>
>> reason for this is that btrfs_shrink_device() adds the device resized to
>> the fs_devices::resized_devices after it has called the last commit
>> transaction.
>> So the list fs_devices::resized_devices is not empty when
>> btrfs_shrink_device() returns.
>> Now the parent function btrfs_rm_device() calls
>> btrfs_close_bdev(device);
>> call_rcu(&device->rcu, free_device_rcu);
>> and then does the commit transaction.
>> The commit transaction goes through the fs_devices::resized_devices
>> in btrfs_update_commit_device_size() and leads to UAF.
>>
>> Fix this by making sure btrfs_shrink_device() calls the last needed
>> btrfs_commit_transaction() before the return.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
>> ---
>> I am bit skeptical about the condition when btrfs_commit_transaction()
>> fails, can you pls be wary about it when reviewing. Thanks.
>>
>> Lu/David,
>> As this issues isn't reproducible at my end, can you pls test this
>> patch on top of the patch
>> btrfs: fix missing superblock update in the device delete commit transaction
>> Thanks.
>>
>> fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 5 ++++-
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
>> index 418843b8f8e8..344083cc811c 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
>> @@ -4464,7 +4464,10 @@ int btrfs_shrink_device(struct btrfs_device *device, u64 new_size)
>>
>> /* Now btrfs_update_device() will change the on-disk size. */
>> ret = btrfs_update_device(trans, device);
>> - btrfs_end_transaction(trans);
>> + if (ret)
>> + btrfs_end_transaction(trans);
>
> Why don't you call btrfs_abort_transaction on error from
> btrfs_update_device?
I still can't figure out, any idea why btrfs_abort_transaction?
Per other codes, we are mixing the use of btrfs_abort_transaction and
btrfs_end_transaction for the user initiated threads where
if the thread fails (after btrfs_start_transaction), IMO
we should let the user to try again. But btrfs_abort_transaction
doesn't provide such a choice consistently as it would endup
in RO.
----
static noinline int btrfs_ioctl_resize(struct file *file,
void __user *arg)
{
::
ret = btrfs_grow_device(trans, device, new_size);
btrfs_commit_transaction(trans); <--Bug? ret is not
checked.
----
static int __btrfs_balance(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
{
::
ret = btrfs_grow_device(trans, device, old_size);
if (ret) {
btrfs_end_transaction(trans);
-----
static noinline int btrfs_ioctl_subvol_setflags(struct file *file,
void __user *arg)
{
::
trans = btrfs_start_transaction(root, 1);
if (IS_ERR(trans)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(trans);
goto out_reset;
}
ret = btrfs_update_root(trans, fs_info->tree_root,
&root->root_key, &root->root_item);
if (ret < 0) {
btrfs_end_transaction(trans);
goto out_reset;
}
ret = btrfs_commit_transaction(trans);
----
static int btrfs_clone(struct inode *src, struct inode *inode,
const u64 off, const u64 olen, const u64
olen_aligned,
const u64 destoff, int no_time_update)
{
trans = btrfs_start_transaction(root, 3);
::
if (ret) {
if (ret != -EOPNOTSUPP)
btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret);
btrfs_end_transaction(trans);
goto out;
}
------
::
Thanks, Anand
>> + else
>> + ret = btrfs_commit_transaction(trans);
>> done:
>> btrfs_free_path(path);
>> if (ret) {
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-03 13:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-25 13:27 [PATCH] btrfs: btrfs_shrink_device should call commit transaction Anand Jain
2018-07-25 16:52 ` Lu Fengqi
2018-07-30 14:18 ` Nikolay Borisov
2018-08-03 11:27 ` Anand Jain [this message]
2018-08-03 11:34 ` Nikolay Borisov
2018-08-06 10:12 ` [PATCH v2] " Anand Jain
2018-08-17 14:04 ` David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b14154e5-9327-b106-97a9-f05af363387d@oracle.com \
--to=anand.jain@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nborisov@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).