From: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] btrfs: Remove bio_offset argument from submit_bio_hook
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 19:39:55 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b28cae6a-8e8b-0e9b-08d7-0b08b907361a@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190410142443.6470-7-nborisov@suse.com>
On 10.04.19 г. 17:24 ч., Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> None of the implementers of the submit_bio_hook use the bio_offset
> parameter, simply remove it. No functional changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 4 ++--
> fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 6 ++----
> fs/btrfs/extent_io.h | 3 +--
> fs/btrfs/inode.c | 5 +++--
> 4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
> index ee9e03b8aae3..0a7897adc58f 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
> @@ -885,8 +885,8 @@ static int check_async_write(struct btrfs_inode *bi)
> }
>
> static blk_status_t btree_submit_bio_hook(struct inode *inode, struct bio *bio,
> - int mirror_num, unsigned long bio_flags,
> - u64 bio_offset)
> + int mirror_num,
> + unsigned long bio_flags)
> {
> struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = btrfs_sb(inode->i_sb);
> int async = check_async_write(BTRFS_I(inode));
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
> index 048d6c6fe7b9..61191156ee2b 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
> @@ -152,16 +152,14 @@ static int __must_check submit_one_bio(struct bio *bio, int mirror_num,
> struct bio_vec *bvec = bio_last_bvec_all(bio);
> struct bio_vec bv;
> struct extent_io_tree *tree = bio->bi_private;
> - u64 start;
>
> mp_bvec_last_segment(bvec, &bv);
> - start = page_offset(bv.bv_page) + bv.bv_offset;
This hunk could be extended even further by removing bv/bvec definitions
as well as the call to mp_bvec_last_segment. Shall I resend or are you
going to fold this change David?
>
> bio->bi_private = NULL;
>
> if (tree->ops)
> ret = tree->ops->submit_bio_hook(tree->private_data, bio,
> - mirror_num, bio_flags, start);
> + mirror_num, bio_flags);
> else
> btrfsic_submit_bio(bio);
>
> @@ -2546,7 +2544,7 @@ static int bio_readpage_error(struct bio *failed_bio, u64 phy_offset,
> read_mode, failrec->this_mirror, failrec->in_validation);
>
> status = tree->ops->submit_bio_hook(tree->private_data, bio, failrec->this_mirror,
> - failrec->bio_flags, 0);
> + failrec->bio_flags);
> if (status) {
> free_io_failure(failure_tree, tree, failrec);
> bio_put(bio);
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.h b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.h
> index 37240e03c4e3..aa18a16a6ed7 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.h
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.h
> @@ -105,8 +105,7 @@ struct extent_io_ops {
> * pointer will be called unconditionally.
> */
> blk_status_t (*submit_bio_hook)(struct inode *inode, struct bio *bio,
> - int mirror_num, unsigned long bio_flags,
> - u64 bio_offset);
> + int mirror_num, unsigned long bio_flags);
> int (*readpage_end_io_hook)(struct btrfs_io_bio *io_bio, u64 phy_offset,
> struct page *page, u64 start, u64 end,
> int mirror);
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> index 6e5f1afa7407..476111d44021 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> @@ -1954,8 +1954,9 @@ static blk_status_t btrfs_submit_bio_start(void *private_data, struct bio *bio,
> * c-3) otherwise: async submit
> */
> static blk_status_t btrfs_submit_bio_hook(struct inode *inode, struct bio *bio,
> - int mirror_num, unsigned long bio_flags,
> - u64 bio_offset)
> + int mirror_num,
> + unsigned long bio_flags)
> +
> {
> struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = btrfs_sb(inode->i_sb);
> struct btrfs_root *root = BTRFS_I(inode)->root;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-10 16:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-10 14:24 [PATCH 0/6] Simplifications around submit_bio_hook Nikolay Borisov
2019-04-10 14:24 ` [PATCH 1/6] btrfs: Define submit_bio_hook's type directly Nikolay Borisov
2019-04-11 11:10 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-04-10 14:24 ` [PATCH 2/6] btrfs: Change submit_bio_hook to taking an inode directly Nikolay Borisov
2019-04-11 11:18 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-04-11 11:23 ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-04-10 14:24 ` [PATCH 3/6] btrfs: Remove 'tree' argument from read_extent_buffer_pages Nikolay Borisov
2019-04-11 13:01 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-04-10 14:24 ` [PATCH 4/6] btrfs: Pass 0 for bio_offset to btrfs_wq_submit_bio Nikolay Borisov
2019-04-11 13:09 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-04-11 13:10 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-04-11 13:17 ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-04-11 13:26 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-04-10 14:24 ` [PATCH 5/6] btrfs: Always pass 0 bio_offset for btree_submit_bio_start Nikolay Borisov
2019-04-11 13:27 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-04-10 14:24 ` [PATCH 6/6] btrfs: Remove bio_offset argument from submit_bio_hook Nikolay Borisov
2019-04-10 16:39 ` Nikolay Borisov [this message]
2019-04-10 16:46 ` [PATCH v2] " Nikolay Borisov
2019-04-11 13:29 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-04-11 14:39 ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-04-18 13:04 ` [PATCH 0/6] Simplifications around submit_bio_hook David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b28cae6a-8e8b-0e9b-08d7-0b08b907361a@suse.com \
--to=nborisov@suse.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).