Re: [PATCH] btrfs: avoid opencoded 64-bit div/mod operation

[Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>]

在 2024/12/16 19:02, Arnd Bergmann 写道:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>
> Dividing 64-bit numbers causes a link failure on 32-bit builds:
>
> arm-linux-gnueabi-ld: fs/btrfs/sysfs.o: in function `btrfs_read_policy_store':
> sysfs.c:(.text+0x3ce0): undefined reference to `__aeabi_ldivmod'
>
> Use an explicit call to div_u64_rem() here to work around this. It would
> be possible to optimize this further, but this is not a performance
> critical operation.
>
> Fixes: 185fa5c7ac5a ("btrfs: introduce RAID1 round-robin read balancing")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> ---
>   fs/btrfs/sysfs.c | 4 +++-
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/sysfs.c b/fs/btrfs/sysfs.c
> index 50bc4b6cb821..67bc8fa4d6ab 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/sysfs.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/sysfs.c
> @@ -1433,7 +1433,9 @@ static ssize_t btrfs_read_policy_store(struct kobject *kobj,
>   #ifdef CONFIG_BTRFS_EXPERIMENTAL
>   	if (index == BTRFS_READ_POLICY_RR) {
>   		if (value != -1) {
> -			if ((value % fs_devices->fs_info->sectorsize) != 0) {
> +			u32 rem;
> +			div_u64_rem(value, fs_devices->fs_info->sectorsize, &rem);

The original check is already bad, it's just a IS_ALIGNED().

So a much simpler solution is:

+			if (!IS_ALIGNED(value, fs_info->sectorsize)) {

Thanks,
Qu

> +			if (rem) {
>   				btrfs_err(fs_devices->fs_info,
>   "read_policy: min_contiguous_read %lld should be multiples of the sectorsize %u",
>   					  value, fs_devices->fs_info->sectorsize);