linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] Btrfs: remove unused code in __btrfs_unlink_inode
@ 2018-09-11 22:06 Liu Bo
  2018-09-12  7:07 ` Nikolay Borisov
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Liu Bo @ 2018-09-11 22:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-btrfs

It might get @leaf and @key in order to do some sanity checks on key's
fields, but since we don't check it any more, it's fine to remove the
code.

Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/inode.c | 4 ----
 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
index d3febc3a6bc0..fd64d7ac76f9 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -3911,9 +3911,7 @@ static int __btrfs_unlink_inode(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 	struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = root->fs_info;
 	struct btrfs_path *path;
 	int ret = 0;
-	struct extent_buffer *leaf;
 	struct btrfs_dir_item *di;
-	struct btrfs_key key;
 	u64 index;
 	u64 ino = btrfs_ino(inode);
 	u64 dir_ino = btrfs_ino(dir);
@@ -3935,8 +3933,6 @@ static int __btrfs_unlink_inode(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 		ret = -ENOENT;
 		goto err;
 	}
-	leaf = path->nodes[0];
-	btrfs_dir_item_key_to_cpu(leaf, di, &key);
 	ret = btrfs_delete_one_dir_name(trans, root, path, di);
 	if (ret)
 		goto err;
-- 
1.8.3.1

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: remove unused code in __btrfs_unlink_inode
  2018-09-11 22:06 [PATCH] Btrfs: remove unused code in __btrfs_unlink_inode Liu Bo
@ 2018-09-12  7:07 ` Nikolay Borisov
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Nikolay Borisov @ 2018-09-12  7:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Liu Bo, linux-btrfs



On 12.09.2018 01:06, Liu Bo wrote:
> It might get @leaf and @key in order to do some sanity checks on key's
> fields, but since we don't check it any more, it's fine to remove the
> code.

This is actually false, leaf and key weren't used for sanity checks.
Instead this code was first introduced in 5f39d397dfbe ("Btrfs: Create
extent_buffer interface for large blocksizes") and the function was
named btrfs_unlink_trans. It later got renamed to __btrfs_unlink_inode
and finally commit 16cdcec736cd ("btrfs: implement delayed inode items
operation") changed the way inodes are deleted and obviated the need for
those two members.

Generally when unused variables are deleted you need to do a bit of
archeology and explain how they got to be unused in the changelog.


> 
> Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
>  fs/btrfs/inode.c | 4 ----
>  1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> index d3febc3a6bc0..fd64d7ac76f9 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> @@ -3911,9 +3911,7 @@ static int __btrfs_unlink_inode(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
>  	struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = root->fs_info;
>  	struct btrfs_path *path;
>  	int ret = 0;
> -	struct extent_buffer *leaf;
>  	struct btrfs_dir_item *di;
> -	struct btrfs_key key;
>  	u64 index;
>  	u64 ino = btrfs_ino(inode);
>  	u64 dir_ino = btrfs_ino(dir);
> @@ -3935,8 +3933,6 @@ static int __btrfs_unlink_inode(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
>  		ret = -ENOENT;
>  		goto err;
>  	}
> -	leaf = path->nodes[0];
> -	btrfs_dir_item_key_to_cpu(leaf, di, &key);
>  	ret = btrfs_delete_one_dir_name(trans, root, path, di);
>  	if (ret)
>  		goto err;
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2018-09-12 12:10 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-09-11 22:06 [PATCH] Btrfs: remove unused code in __btrfs_unlink_inode Liu Bo
2018-09-12  7:07 ` Nikolay Borisov

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).