* [PATCH] Btrfs: remove unused code in __btrfs_unlink_inode
@ 2018-09-11 22:06 Liu Bo
2018-09-12 7:07 ` Nikolay Borisov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Liu Bo @ 2018-09-11 22:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrfs
It might get @leaf and @key in order to do some sanity checks on key's
fields, but since we don't check it any more, it's fine to remove the
code.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com>
---
fs/btrfs/inode.c | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
index d3febc3a6bc0..fd64d7ac76f9 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -3911,9 +3911,7 @@ static int __btrfs_unlink_inode(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = root->fs_info;
struct btrfs_path *path;
int ret = 0;
- struct extent_buffer *leaf;
struct btrfs_dir_item *di;
- struct btrfs_key key;
u64 index;
u64 ino = btrfs_ino(inode);
u64 dir_ino = btrfs_ino(dir);
@@ -3935,8 +3933,6 @@ static int __btrfs_unlink_inode(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
ret = -ENOENT;
goto err;
}
- leaf = path->nodes[0];
- btrfs_dir_item_key_to_cpu(leaf, di, &key);
ret = btrfs_delete_one_dir_name(trans, root, path, di);
if (ret)
goto err;
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: remove unused code in __btrfs_unlink_inode
2018-09-11 22:06 [PATCH] Btrfs: remove unused code in __btrfs_unlink_inode Liu Bo
@ 2018-09-12 7:07 ` Nikolay Borisov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Nikolay Borisov @ 2018-09-12 7:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Liu Bo, linux-btrfs
On 12.09.2018 01:06, Liu Bo wrote:
> It might get @leaf and @key in order to do some sanity checks on key's
> fields, but since we don't check it any more, it's fine to remove the
> code.
This is actually false, leaf and key weren't used for sanity checks.
Instead this code was first introduced in 5f39d397dfbe ("Btrfs: Create
extent_buffer interface for large blocksizes") and the function was
named btrfs_unlink_trans. It later got renamed to __btrfs_unlink_inode
and finally commit 16cdcec736cd ("btrfs: implement delayed inode items
operation") changed the way inodes are deleted and obviated the need for
those two members.
Generally when unused variables are deleted you need to do a bit of
archeology and explain how they got to be unused in the changelog.
>
> Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/inode.c | 4 ----
> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> index d3febc3a6bc0..fd64d7ac76f9 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> @@ -3911,9 +3911,7 @@ static int __btrfs_unlink_inode(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
> struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = root->fs_info;
> struct btrfs_path *path;
> int ret = 0;
> - struct extent_buffer *leaf;
> struct btrfs_dir_item *di;
> - struct btrfs_key key;
> u64 index;
> u64 ino = btrfs_ino(inode);
> u64 dir_ino = btrfs_ino(dir);
> @@ -3935,8 +3933,6 @@ static int __btrfs_unlink_inode(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
> ret = -ENOENT;
> goto err;
> }
> - leaf = path->nodes[0];
> - btrfs_dir_item_key_to_cpu(leaf, di, &key);
> ret = btrfs_delete_one_dir_name(trans, root, path, di);
> if (ret)
> goto err;
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-09-12 12:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-09-11 22:06 [PATCH] Btrfs: remove unused code in __btrfs_unlink_inode Liu Bo
2018-09-12 7:07 ` Nikolay Borisov
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).