linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
To: jeffm@suse.com, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: remove dead create_space_info calls
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 08:28:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b904edae-d12d-c5ce-7d78-d151609e13df@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180320192526.4629-1-jeffm@suse.com>



On 20.03.2018 21:25, jeffm@suse.com wrote:
> From: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
> 
> Since commit 2be12ef79 (btrfs: Separate space_info create/update), we've
> separated out the creation and updating of the space info structures.
> That commit was a straightforward refactoring of the two parts of
> update_space_info, but we can go a step further.  Since commits
> c59021f84 (Btrfs: fix OOPS of empty filesystem after balance) and
> b742bb82f (Btrfs: Link block groups of different raid types), we know
> that the space_info structures will be created at mount and there will
> only ever be, at most, three of them.
> 
> This patch cleans out the create_space_info calls after __find_space_info
> returns NULL since __find_space_info *can't* return NULL.
> 
> The initial cause for reviewing this was the kobject_add calls from
> create_space_info occuring in sites where fs-reclaim wasn't allowed.  Now
> we are certain they occur only early in the mount process and are safe.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>

So when I did this cleanup I really wasn't sure under what conditions
space_info was allocated apart from mount time. I'm glad you were able
to prove it's not really done at any other time.

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>

> ---
>  fs/btrfs/ctree.h       |  6 +++---
>  fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 16 ++--------------
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
> index da308774b8a4..ffbb05aa66fa 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
> @@ -952,9 +952,9 @@ struct btrfs_fs_info {
>  	struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices;
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * the space_info list is almost entirely read only.  It only changes
> -	 * when we add a new raid type to the FS, and that happens
> -	 * very rarely.  RCU is used to protect it.
> +	 * The space_info list is effectively read only after initial
> +	 * setup.  It is populated at mount time and cleaned up after
> +	 * all block groups are removed.  RCU is used to protect it.
>  	 */
>  	struct list_head space_info;
>  
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> index 2d5e963fae88..0e9a21230217 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> @@ -4603,11 +4603,7 @@ static int do_chunk_alloc(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
>  		return -ENOSPC;
>  
>  	space_info = __find_space_info(fs_info, flags);
> -	if (!space_info) {
> -		ret = create_space_info(fs_info, flags, &space_info);
> -		if (ret)
> -			return ret;
> -	}
> +	ASSERT(space_info);
>  
>  again:
>  	spin_lock(&space_info->lock);
> @@ -10255,15 +10251,7 @@ int btrfs_make_block_group(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
>  	 * with its ->space_info set.
>  	 */
>  	cache->space_info = __find_space_info(fs_info, cache->flags);
> -	if (!cache->space_info) {
> -		ret = create_space_info(fs_info, cache->flags,
> -				       &cache->space_info);
> -		if (ret) {
> -			btrfs_remove_free_space_cache(cache);
> -			btrfs_put_block_group(cache);
> -			return ret;
> -		}
> -	}
> +	ASSERT(cache->space_info);
>  
>  	ret = btrfs_add_block_group_cache(fs_info, cache);
>  	if (ret) {
> 

      parent reply	other threads:[~2018-03-21  6:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-20 19:25 [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: remove dead create_space_info calls jeffm
2018-03-20 19:25 ` [PATCH 2/2] btrfs: defer adding raid type kobject until after chunk relocation jeffm
2018-03-21  6:44   ` Nikolay Borisov
2018-03-22 15:52     ` David Sterba
2018-03-21  6:28 ` Nikolay Borisov [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b904edae-d12d-c5ce-7d78-d151609e13df@suse.com \
    --to=nborisov@suse.com \
    --cc=jeffm@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).