From: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
To: dsterba@suse.cz
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, dsterba@suse.com, gpiccoli@igalia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] btrfs: show temp_fsid feature in sysfs
Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2023 15:01:07 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ba5ffc5e-c23b-4728-84aa-be968ce98418@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b658ef3f-9fd0-45a1-8950-c86f4f1b450c@oracle.com>
On 10/7/23 17:12, Anand Jain wrote:
>
>
> On 10/6/23 22:55, David Sterba wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 11:00:27PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
>>> This adds sysfs objects to indicate temp_fsid feature support and
>>> its status.
>>>
>>> /sys/fs/btrfs/features/temp_fsid
>>> /sys/fs/btrfs/<UUID>/temp_fsid
>>>
>>> For example:
>>>
>>> Consider two cloned and mounted devices.
>>>
>>> $ blkid /dev/sdc[1-2]
>>> /dev/sdc1: UUID="509ad44b-ad2a-4a8a-bc8d-fe69db7220d5" ..
>>> /dev/sdc2: UUID="509ad44b-ad2a-4a8a-bc8d-fe69db7220d5" ..
>>>
>>> One gets actual fsid, and the other gets the temp_fsid when
>>> mounted.
>>>
>>> $ btrfs filesystem show -m
>>> Label: none uuid: 509ad44b-ad2a-4a8a-bc8d-fe69db7220d5
>>> Total devices 1 FS bytes used 54.14MiB
>>> devid 1 size 300.00MiB used 144.00MiB path /dev/sdc1
>>>
>>> Label: none uuid: 33bad74e-c91b-43a5-aef8-b3cab97ae63a
>>> Total devices 1 FS bytes used 54.14MiB
>>> devid 1 size 300.00MiB used 144.00MiB path /dev/sdc2
>>>
>>> Their sysfs as below.
>>>
>>> $ cat /sys/fs/btrfs/features/temp_fsid
>>> 0
>>>
>>> $ cat /sys/fs/btrfs/509ad44b-ad2a-4a8a-bc8d-fe69db7220d5/temp_fsid
>>> 0
>>>
>>> $ cat /sys/fs/btrfs/33bad74e-c91b-43a5-aef8-b3cab97ae63a/temp_fsid
>>> 1
>>
>> So the fsid used for the directory is always the new one, is there a way
>> to read which is the original filesystem's fsid? In this case it would
>> be the 509ad44b-... We could print it in that file instead of '1',
>> though it could be confusing that it's not the temp_fsid but the
>> original one, file name mismatches the contents on first look.
>
> Instead, can we emit 'fsid' in another kobject altogether?
> Furthermore, we also have a 'metadata_uuid' kobject. Here
> is how they relate.
>
>
> 1. normally:
>
> $ cat /sys/fs/btrfs/<meta-fsid>/fsid
> <meta-fsid>
> $ cat /sys/fs/btrfs/<meta-fsid>/metadata_uuid
> <meta-fsid>
>
>
> 2. metadata-uuid flag is set:
>
> $ cat /sys/fs/btrfs/<sb-fsid>/fsid
> <sb-fsid>
> $ cat /sys/fs/btrfs/<sb-fsid>/metadata_uuid
> <meta-fsid>
>
>
> 3. normal + temp-fsid:
>
> $ cat /sys/fs/btrfs/<temp-fsid>/fsid
> <meta-fsid>
> $ cat /sys/fs/btrfs/<temp-fsid>/metadata_uuid
> <meta-fsid>
>
>
> 4. metadata-uuid flag is set + temp-fsid:
>
> $ cat /sys/fs/btrfs/<temp-fsid>/fsid
> <sb-fsid>
> $ cat /sys/fs/btrfs/<temp-fsid>/metadata_uuid
> <meta-fsid>
Let's consider this thought:
The proposal above implies that /sys/fs/btrfs/<temp-fsid>/temp_fsid
will continue to function as described in this patch. Otherwise,
determining whether temp_fsid is enabled becomes challenging.
As part of the temp-fsid feature, we plan to introduce two additional
kobjects. However, if this results in an excessive number of kobjects,
then...
We have the option to rename /sys/fs/btrfs/<temp-fsid>/temp_fsid
to /sys/fs/btrfs/<temp-fsid>/temp-fsid_enabled_super_fsid to display
the actual sb::fsid.
Thanks, Anand
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-07 9:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-04 15:00 [PATCH 0/4] btrfs: sysfs and unsupported temp-fsid features for clones Anand Jain
2023-10-04 15:00 ` [PATCH 1/4] btrfs: comment for temp-fsid, fsid, and metadata_uuid Anand Jain
2023-10-04 15:00 ` [PATCH 2/4] btrfs: disable seed feature for temp-fsid Anand Jain
2023-10-04 15:00 ` [PATCH 3/4] btrfs: disable the device add " Anand Jain
2023-10-04 15:00 ` [PATCH 4/4] btrfs: show temp_fsid feature in sysfs Anand Jain
2023-10-06 14:55 ` David Sterba
2023-10-07 9:12 ` Anand Jain
2023-10-07 9:31 ` Anand Jain [this message]
2023-10-06 15:07 ` [PATCH 0/4] btrfs: sysfs and unsupported temp-fsid features for clones David Sterba
2023-10-07 10:30 ` Anand Jain
2023-10-09 7:00 ` Guilherme G. Piccoli
2023-10-09 8:07 ` Anand Jain
2023-10-09 23:59 ` David Sterba
2023-10-10 1:22 ` Anand Jain
2023-10-18 13:37 ` Guilherme G. Piccoli
2023-10-18 23:04 ` David Sterba
2023-10-19 8:06 ` Guilherme G. Piccoli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ba5ffc5e-c23b-4728-84aa-be968ce98418@oracle.com \
--to=anand.jain@oracle.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=gpiccoli@igalia.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).