From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
To: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>, Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/10] btrfs: relocation: Remove the open-coded goto loop for breadth-first search
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2020 16:37:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bb1aa705-5735-0c93-1f55-7051810d9e33@gmx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <09fa33e1-740d-b4b0-2ff6-467cee674feb@suse.com>
On 2020/3/5 下午4:17, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>
>
> On 5.03.20 г. 2:40 ч., Qu Wenruo wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2020/3/4 下午10:24, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>>>
>> [...]
>>>> + int err = 0;
>>>> +
>>>> + iter = btrfs_backref_iter_alloc(rc->extent_root->fs_info, GFP_NOFS);
>>>> + if (!iter)
>>>> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>>>
>>> This iterator can be made private to handle_one_tree_block as I don't see it being used outside of that function.
>>
>> It's kinda a performance optimization.
>>
>> Instead of allocating memory for each loop, we allocate the memory just
>> once, and reuse it until the whole backref map for the bytenr is built.
>>>
>>>> + path = btrfs_alloc_path();
>>>> + if (!path) {
>>>> + err = -ENOMEM;
>>>> + goto out;
>>>> + }
>>>
>>> Same thing with this path. Overall this will reduce the argument to handle_one_tree_block by 2.
>>
>> Same performance optimization here.
>
> Ok, fair point.
>>
>>>
>
> <snip>
>
>>>
>>> or simply if (!edge)
>>> break;
>>>
>>> Also this loop can be rewritten as a do {} while() and it will look:
>>
>> Yep, but I'm not sure if such do {} while() loop is preferred.
>> IIRC there are some docs saying to avoid such loop?
>
> I'm not aware of any such docs, can you point me to them?
Then I guess it's not a problem. Pretty happy to utilize do {} while ()
loop in the future.
Thanks,
Qu
>
>>
>> If there is no such restriction, I would be pretty happy to go that way.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Qu
>>
>
> <snip>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-05 8:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-02 9:45 [PATCH v2 00/10] btrfs: relocation: Refactor build_backref_tree() Qu Wenruo
2020-03-02 9:45 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] btrfs: backref: Introduce the skeleton of btrfs_backref_iter Qu Wenruo
2020-03-03 17:19 ` David Sterba
2020-03-04 0:50 ` Qu Wenruo
2020-03-03 17:25 ` David Sterba
2020-03-04 0:52 ` Qu Wenruo
2020-03-04 7:41 ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-03-02 9:45 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] btrfs: backref: Implement btrfs_backref_iter_next() Qu Wenruo
2020-03-02 9:45 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] btrfs: relocation: Use btrfs_backref_iter infrastructure Qu Wenruo
2020-03-02 9:45 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] btrfs: relocation: Rename mark_block_processed() and __mark_block_processed() Qu Wenruo
2020-03-02 17:21 ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-03-02 9:45 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] btrfs: relocation: Refactor tree backref processing into its own function Qu Wenruo
2020-03-03 17:29 ` David Sterba
2020-03-04 1:00 ` Qu Wenruo
2020-03-04 12:23 ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-03-04 12:33 ` Qu Wenruo
2020-03-02 9:45 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] btrfs: relocation: Use wrapper to replace open-coded edge linking Qu Wenruo
2020-03-03 17:30 ` David Sterba
2020-03-04 1:02 ` Qu Wenruo
2020-03-04 13:02 ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-03-02 9:45 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] btrfs: relocation: Specify essential members for alloc_backref_node() Qu Wenruo
2020-03-04 13:06 ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-03-04 13:09 ` Qu Wenruo
2020-03-02 9:45 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] btrfs: relocation: Remove the open-coded goto loop for breadth-first search Qu Wenruo
2020-03-04 14:24 ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-03-05 0:40 ` Qu Wenruo
2020-03-05 8:17 ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-03-05 8:37 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2020-03-02 9:45 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] btrfs: relocation: Refactor the finishing part of upper linkage into finish_upper_links() Qu Wenruo
2020-03-02 9:45 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] btrfs: relocation: Refactor the useless nodes handling into its own function Qu Wenruo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bb1aa705-5735-0c93-1f55-7051810d9e33@gmx.com \
--to=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nborisov@suse.com \
--cc=wqu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox