From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:33981 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751460AbeDDIyA (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Apr 2018 04:54:00 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/10] btrfs: qgroup: Use independent and accurate per inode qgroup rsv To: Qu Wenruo , Qu Wenruo , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Cc: dsterba@suse.cz References: <20171222061847.13158-1-wqu@suse.com> <20171222061847.13158-11-wqu@suse.com> <8476c1ee-365a-bb0f-0d44-94cca28d09f3@gmx.com> From: Nikolay Borisov Message-ID: Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2018 11:53:56 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <8476c1ee-365a-bb0f-0d44-94cca28d09f3@gmx.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 3.04.2018 10:30, Qu Wenruo wrote: > Hi David, > > I didn't see this patch merged in your misc-next branch but only the > remaining patches. > > However without this patch, btrfs qgroup reserved space will get > obviously increased as prealloc metadata reserved space is never freed > until inode reserved space is freed. > > This would cause a lot of qgroup related test cases to fail. > > Would you please merge this patch with all qgroup patchset? I'm seeing btrfs/022 and btrfs/099 fail as of today's misc-next. Both are qgroup related tests.