public inbox for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sun YangKai <sunk67188@gmail.com>
To: Leo Martins <loemra.dev@gmail.com>,
	linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] btrfs: skip COW for written extent buffers allocated in current transaction
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2026 09:25:03 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bcde0730-b3d4-4aa2-88f9-7fee861601cc@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <04eca407999f1db58a4af9f4d88397aa2edd2d3c.1771012202.git.loemra.dev@gmail.com>

Thanks for your working on this and I've expecting this for a long time :)

On 2026/2/14 04:30, Leo Martins wrote:
> When memory pressure causes writeback of a recently COW'd buffer,
> btrfs sets BTRFS_HEADER_FLAG_WRITTEN on it. Subsequent
> btrfs_search_slot() restarts then see the WRITTEN flag and re-COW
> the buffer unnecessarily, causing COW amplification that can exhaust
> block reservations and degrade throughput.
> 
> Overwriting in place is crash-safe because the committed superblock
> does not reference buffers allocated in the current (uncommitted)
> transaction, so no on-disk tree points to this block yet.
> 
> When should_cow_block() encounters a WRITTEN buffer whose generation
> matches the current transaction, instead of requesting a COW, re-dirty
> the buffer and re-register its range in the transaction's dirty_pages.
> 
> Both are necessary because btrfs tracks dirty metadata through two
> independent mechanisms. set_extent_buffer_dirty() sets the
> EXTENT_BUFFER_DIRTY flag and the buffer_tree xarray PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY
> mark, which is what background writeback (btree_write_cache_pages) uses
> to find and write dirty buffers. The transaction's dirty_pages io tree
> is a separate structure used by btrfs_write_and_wait_transaction() at
> commit time to ensure all buffers allocated during the transaction are
> persisted. The dirty_pages range was originally registered in
> btrfs_init_new_buffer() when the block was first allocated, but
> background writeback may have already written and cleared it.
> 
> Keep BTRFS_HEADER_FLAG_WRITTEN set so that btrfs_free_tree_block()
> correctly pins the block if it is freed later.
> 
> Exclude cases where in-place overwrite is not safe:
>   - EXTENT_BUFFER_WRITEBACK: buffer is mid-I/O
>   - Zoned devices: require sequential writes
>   - Log trees: log blocks are immediately referenced by a committed
>     superblock via btrfs_sync_log(), so overwriting could corrupt the
>     committed log
>   - BTRFS_ROOT_FORCE_COW: snapshot in progress
>   - BTRFS_HEADER_FLAG_RELOC: block being relocated
> 
> Signed-off-by: Leo Martins <loemra.dev@gmail.com>
> ---
>   fs/btrfs/ctree.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>   1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
> index 7267b2502665..a345e1be24d8 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
> @@ -599,9 +599,9 @@ int btrfs_force_cow_block(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
>   	return ret;
>   }
>   
> -static inline bool should_cow_block(const struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
> +static inline bool should_cow_block(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
>   				    const struct btrfs_root *root,
> -				    const struct extent_buffer *buf)
> +				    struct extent_buffer *buf)
>   {
>   	if (btrfs_is_testing(root->fs_info))
>   		return false;
> @@ -621,8 +621,55 @@ static inline bool should_cow_block(const struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
>   	if (btrfs_header_generation(buf) != trans->transid)
>   		return true;
>   
> -	if (btrfs_header_flag(buf, BTRFS_HEADER_FLAG_WRITTEN))
> +	if (btrfs_header_flag(buf, BTRFS_HEADER_FLAG_WRITTEN)) {
> +		/*
> +		 * The buffer was allocated in this transaction and has been
> +		 * written back to disk (WRITTEN is set). Normally we'd COW
> +		 * it again, but since the committed superblock doesn't
> +		 * reference this buffer (it was allocated this transaction),
> +		 * we can safely overwrite it in place.
> +		 *
> +		 * We keep BTRFS_HEADER_FLAG_WRITTEN set. The block has been
> +		 * persisted at this bytenr and will be again after the
> +		 * in-place update. This is important so that
> +		 * btrfs_free_tree_block() correctly pins the block if it is
> +		 * freed later (e.g., during tree rebalancing or FORCE_COW).
> +		 *
> +		 * We re-dirty the buffer to ensure the in-place modifications
> +		 * will be written back to disk.
> +		 *
> +		 * Exclusions:
> +		 * - Log trees: log blocks are written and immediately
> +		 *   referenced by a committed superblock via
> +		 *   btrfs_sync_log(), bypassing the normal transaction
> +		 *   commit. Overwriting in place could corrupt the
> +		 *   committed log.
> +		 * - Zoned devices: require sequential writes
> +		 * - FORCE_COW: snapshot in progress
> +		 * - RELOC flag: block being relocated
> +		 */
> +		if (!test_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_WRITEBACK, &buf->bflags) &&
> +		    !btrfs_is_zoned(root->fs_info) &&
> +		    btrfs_root_id(root) != BTRFS_TREE_LOG_OBJECTID &&
> +		    !test_bit(BTRFS_ROOT_FORCE_COW, &root->state) &&
it seems we need smp_mb__before_atomic() to see the FORCE_COW bit?
> +		    !btrfs_header_flag(buf, BTRFS_HEADER_FLAG_RELOC)) {
> +			/*
> +			 * Re-register this block's range in the current
> +			 * transaction's dirty_pages so that
> +			 * btrfs_write_and_wait_transaction() writes it.
> +			 * The range was originally registered when the block
> +			 * was allocated, but that transaction's dirty_pages
> +			 * may have already been released.
> +			 */
> +			btrfs_set_extent_bit(&trans->transaction->dirty_pages,
> +					     buf->start,
> +					     buf->start + buf->len - 1,
> +					     EXTENT_DIRTY, NULL);
> +			set_extent_buffer_dirty(buf);
why use set_extent_buffer_dirty() instead of btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty()? 
I don't see any other callers doing this.
> +			return false;
> +		}
>   		return true;
> +	}
>   
>   	/* Ensure we can see the FORCE_COW bit. */
>   	smp_mb__before_atomic();

And I wonder if we could have something more readable like this:

	if (btrfs_header_generation(buf) != trans->transid)
		return true;

	if (test_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_WRITEBACK, &buf->bflags))
		return true;

	if (btrfs_root_id(root) != BTRFS_TREE_RELOC_OBJECTID &&
	    btrfs_header_flag(buf, BTRFS_HEADER_FLAG_RELOC))
		return true;

	/* Ensure we can see the FORCE_COW bit. */
	smp_mb__before_atomic();
	if (test_bit(BTRFS_ROOT_FORCE_COW, &root->state))
		return true;

	if (btrfs_header_flag(buf, BTRFS_HEADER_FLAG_WRITTEN)) {
		if (btrfs_root_id(root) == BTRFS_TREE_LOG_OBJECTID ||
		    btrfs_is_zoned(root->fs_info))
				return true;
		btrfs_set_extent_bit(&trans->transaction->dirty_pages,
				     buf->start,
				     buf->start + buf->len - 1,
				     EXTENT_DIRTY, NULL);
		btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty(trans, buf);
	}

	return false;

Thanks,
Sun YangKai



  reply	other threads:[~2026-02-14  1:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-13 20:30 [PATCH v2 0/3] btrfs: fix COW amplification under memory pressure Leo Martins
2026-02-13 20:30 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] btrfs: skip COW for written extent buffers allocated in current transaction Leo Martins
2026-02-14  1:25   ` Sun YangKai [this message]
2026-02-17 22:04     ` Leo Martins
2026-02-16 12:18   ` Filipe Manana
2026-02-17 21:48     ` Leo Martins
2026-02-13 20:30 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] btrfs: inhibit extent buffer writeback to prevent COW amplification Leo Martins
2026-02-16 12:33   ` Filipe Manana
2026-02-13 20:30 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] btrfs: add tracepoint for COW amplification tracking Leo Martins
2026-02-16 12:40   ` Filipe Manana
2026-02-17 22:06     ` Leo Martins

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bcde0730-b3d4-4aa2-88f9-7fee861601cc@gmail.com \
    --to=sunk67188@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=loemra.dev@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox