From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:47144 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751750AbeFENrz (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jun 2018 09:47:55 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC ver.B] btrfs: scrub: Don't use inode pages for device replace To: dsterba@suse.cz, Qu Wenruo , Qu Wenruo , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org References: <20180605043656.4006-1-wqu@suse.com> <20180605134237.GA3539@twin.jikos.cz> From: Qu Wenruo Message-ID: Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2018 21:47:46 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180605134237.GA3539@twin.jikos.cz> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tVAKQGCMRCEWp0B0ASN24mPhl7c5zqYvc" Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --tVAKQGCMRCEWp0B0ASN24mPhl7c5zqYvc Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="7UexUjaot1oshf9wg0tj8jkHW7tCZkYO8"; protected-headers="v1" From: Qu Wenruo To: dsterba@suse.cz, Qu Wenruo , Qu Wenruo , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC ver.B] btrfs: scrub: Don't use inode pages for device replace References: <20180605043656.4006-1-wqu@suse.com> <20180605134237.GA3539@twin.jikos.cz> In-Reply-To: <20180605134237.GA3539@twin.jikos.cz> --7UexUjaot1oshf9wg0tj8jkHW7tCZkYO8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2018=E5=B9=B406=E6=9C=8805=E6=97=A5 21:42, David Sterba wrote: > On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 01:34:03PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: >> Hi David, >> >> It would be pretty nice if we could get this fix (or previous RFC patc= h) >> to get into current release cycle. >> >> As it's a unrecoverable data corruption, it would be better to get it >> fixed as soon as possible. >=20 > That we can do, I'm planning to send 2nd pull by the end of the next > week as there's at least one patch in the queue now. >=20 > This patch seems to big, can you please prepare a minimal version? The previous version (a completely different direction though) is much smaller. https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10440541/ However personally speaking, I still prefer this one, as it's much simple= r. Thanks, Qu > Thanks. >=20 --7UexUjaot1oshf9wg0tj8jkHW7tCZkYO8-- --tVAKQGCMRCEWp0B0ASN24mPhl7c5zqYvc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEELd9y5aWlW6idqkLhwj2R86El/qgFAlsWlIIACgkQwj2R86El /qiopwgAkQ5zmjDCLLubMnqtMva82v/PEaIwqJlIsCqNfumiJ8cB8lvC1bNmhFnE 8tpQhBIqeXNk2Nn5itZUTyc3JaCE3D3aOmLRgCB1dowhPG6+BPIwy1RIiJLAKVkM MkLl2ldLWy2WnMddcSphB/m5dVE7rowm73/iAalFyyRWaMpe8ivp9ypxXSpjLrK6 BQSCKv72k02UWIWDtZggy3CAhXBDky4UVNbU1GmEjF7x7miIhUtQrJUWpNbZoBWW Bxz4XkCpxVBRBg68FlSXSdIVeSc2MkMeOu4E4JPuNkfCCeDc19YNIJ5cQ8e3q5nX q+YjTX7L702MLl/qEci6EcTGfYw7Og== =CAS5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tVAKQGCMRCEWp0B0ASN24mPhl7c5zqYvc--