From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.linuxsystems.it ([79.7.78.67]:55783 "EHLO mail.linuxsystems.it" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751115AbeEUNtw (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 May 2018 09:49:52 -0400 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Niccol=F2_Belli?= To: Tomasz Pala Cc: Subject: Re: Any chance to get snapshot-aware =?iso-8859-1?Q?defragmentation=3F?= Date: Mon, 21 May 2018 15:49:48 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20180520105928.GA17117@polanet.pl> References: <4428b2eb-796a-4c1b-8527-a05532436da4@linuxsystems.it> <20180518162051.GS6649@twin.jikos.cz> <99d57070-a1df-45ef-8f7e-df832bd7ad92@linuxsystems.it> <20180518235530.GA12463@polanet.pl> <06bf88aa-c585-45ac-a670-b81f3f747ce6@linuxsystems.it> <20180520105928.GA17117@polanet.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On domenica 20 maggio 2018 12:59:28 CEST, Tomasz Pala wrote: > On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 10:56:32 +0200, Niccol? Belli wrote: >> snapper users with hourly snapshots will not have any use for it. > Anyone with hourly snapshots anyone is doomed anyway. I do not agree: having hourly snapshots doesn't mean you cannot limit snapshots at a reasonable number. In fact you can simply keep a dozen of them, then start discarding the older ones.