* Generic/389 xfs_io segfault on btrfs and ext4
@ 2017-01-11 2:08 Qu Wenruo
2017-01-11 2:40 ` Eric Sandeen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Qu Wenruo @ 2017-01-11 2:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eryu Guan, agruenba, btrfs, fstests, linux-xfs
Hi, Andreas and Eryu,
I found test case generic/389 fails on btrfs and ext4, and it fails with
xfs_io segfault.
So it seems to be a bug in xfsprogs, but I'm already using the latest
release from Fedora.
Is this a known bug?
Thanks,
Qu
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Generic/389 xfs_io segfault on btrfs and ext4
2017-01-11 2:08 Generic/389 xfs_io segfault on btrfs and ext4 Qu Wenruo
@ 2017-01-11 2:40 ` Eric Sandeen
2017-01-11 2:45 ` Qu Wenruo
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Eric Sandeen @ 2017-01-11 2:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Qu Wenruo, Eryu Guan, agruenba, btrfs, fstests, linux-xfs
On 1/10/17 8:08 PM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> Hi, Andreas and Eryu,
>
> I found test case generic/389 fails on btrfs and ext4, and it fails with xfs_io segfault.
Details, please?
Works ok here:
# ./check generic/389
FSTYP -- ext4
PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 bp-05 4.9.0-rc1+
MKFS_OPTIONS -- /dev/sdb2
MOUNT_OPTIONS -- -o acl,user_xattr -o context=system_u:object_r:nfs_t:s0 /dev/sdb2 /mnt/scratch
generic/389 1s ... 1s
Ran: generic/389
Passed all 1 tests
# rpm -q xfsprogs
xfsprogs-4.9.0-1.el6.x86_64
What version of kernel and xfsprogs were you testing, and what was the segfault?
Thanks,
-Eric
> So it seems to be a bug in xfsprogs, but I'm already using the latest release from Fedora.
>
> Is this a known bug?
>
> Thanks,
> Qu
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Generic/389 xfs_io segfault on btrfs and ext4
2017-01-11 2:40 ` Eric Sandeen
@ 2017-01-11 2:45 ` Qu Wenruo
2017-01-11 2:53 ` Eric Sandeen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Qu Wenruo @ 2017-01-11 2:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Sandeen, Eryu Guan, agruenba, btrfs, fstests, linux-xfs
At 01/11/2017 10:40 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 1/10/17 8:08 PM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>> Hi, Andreas and Eryu,
>>
>> I found test case generic/389 fails on btrfs and ext4, and it fails with xfs_io segfault.
>
> Details, please?
>
> Works ok here:
>
> # ./check generic/389
> FSTYP -- ext4
> PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 bp-05 4.9.0-rc1+
> MKFS_OPTIONS -- /dev/sdb2
> MOUNT_OPTIONS -- -o acl,user_xattr -o context=system_u:object_r:nfs_t:s0 /dev/sdb2 /mnt/scratch
>
> generic/389 1s ... 1s
> Ran: generic/389
> Passed all 1 tests
>
> # rpm -q xfsprogs
> xfsprogs-4.9.0-1.el6.x86_64
OK, that's the problem.
My repo only provides old xfsprogs, which xfsprogs-4.5.0-2.fc25.x86_64.
>
> What version of kernel and xfsprogs were you testing, and what was the segfault?
Kernel is mainline v4.10-rc1.
No debuginfo installed, so no backtrace, but since there is so many
So the problem is the old xfsprogs, I'll update or compile xfsprogs.
Thanks for your kind info.
Thanks,
Qu
>
> Thanks,
> -Eric
>
>> So it seems to be a bug in xfsprogs, but I'm already using the latest release from Fedora.
>>
>> Is this a known bug?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Qu
>>
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Generic/389 xfs_io segfault on btrfs and ext4
2017-01-11 2:45 ` Qu Wenruo
@ 2017-01-11 2:53 ` Eric Sandeen
2017-01-11 3:00 ` Qu Wenruo
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Eric Sandeen @ 2017-01-11 2:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Qu Wenruo, Eric Sandeen, Eryu Guan, agruenba, btrfs, fstests,
linux-xfs
On 1/10/17 8:45 PM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
>
> At 01/11/2017 10:40 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
...
>> What version of kernel and xfsprogs were you testing, and what was the segfault?
>
> Kernel is mainline v4.10-rc1.
> No debuginfo installed, so no backtrace, but since there is so many
>
> So the problem is the old xfsprogs, I'll update or compile xfsprogs.
> Thanks for your kind info.
Just FWIW, I always have latest xfsprogs in rawhide, but I don't usually push
to other fedoras.
It should be easy to grab
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/xfsprogs/4.9.0/1.fc26/src/xfsprogs-4.9.0-1.fc26.src.rpm
and rebuild & install.
-Eric
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Generic/389 xfs_io segfault on btrfs and ext4
2017-01-11 2:53 ` Eric Sandeen
@ 2017-01-11 3:00 ` Qu Wenruo
2017-01-11 3:01 ` Eric Sandeen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Qu Wenruo @ 2017-01-11 3:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Sandeen, Eric Sandeen, Eryu Guan, agruenba, btrfs, fstests,
linux-xfs
At 01/11/2017 10:53 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 1/10/17 8:45 PM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>>
>>
>> At 01/11/2017 10:40 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>
> ...
>
>>> What version of kernel and xfsprogs were you testing, and what was the segfault?
>>
>> Kernel is mainline v4.10-rc1.
>> No debuginfo installed, so no backtrace, but since there is so many
>>
>> So the problem is the old xfsprogs, I'll update or compile xfsprogs.
>> Thanks for your kind info.
>
> Just FWIW, I always have latest xfsprogs in rawhide, but I don't usually push
> to other fedoras.
>
> It should be easy to grab
> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/xfsprogs/4.9.0/1.fc26/src/xfsprogs-4.9.0-1.fc26.src.rpm
> and rebuild & install.
Thanks for the info.
I have already compiled latest version and it works perfectly.
BTW, just wonder if or when Fedora will do rolling release, which should
avoid such problem.
Thanks,
Qu
>
> -Eric
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Generic/389 xfs_io segfault on btrfs and ext4
2017-01-11 3:00 ` Qu Wenruo
@ 2017-01-11 3:01 ` Eric Sandeen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Eric Sandeen @ 2017-01-11 3:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Qu Wenruo, Eric Sandeen, Eryu Guan, agruenba, btrfs, fstests,
linux-xfs
On 1/10/17 9:00 PM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
>
> At 01/11/2017 10:53 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> On 1/10/17 8:45 PM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> At 01/11/2017 10:40 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>
>> ...
>>
>>>> What version of kernel and xfsprogs were you testing, and what was the segfault?
>>>
>>> Kernel is mainline v4.10-rc1.
>>> No debuginfo installed, so no backtrace, but since there is so many
>>>
>>> So the problem is the old xfsprogs, I'll update or compile xfsprogs.
>>> Thanks for your kind info.
>>
>> Just FWIW, I always have latest xfsprogs in rawhide, but I don't usually push
>> to other fedoras.
>>
>> It should be easy to grab
>> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/xfsprogs/4.9.0/1.fc26/src/xfsprogs-4.9.0-1.fc26.src.rpm
>> and rebuild & install.
>
> Thanks for the info.
>
> I have already compiled latest version and it works perfectly.
>
> BTW, just wonder if or when Fedora will do rolling release, which should avoid such problem.
You can always run rawhide. :)
-Eric
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-01-11 3:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-01-11 2:08 Generic/389 xfs_io segfault on btrfs and ext4 Qu Wenruo
2017-01-11 2:40 ` Eric Sandeen
2017-01-11 2:45 ` Qu Wenruo
2017-01-11 2:53 ` Eric Sandeen
2017-01-11 3:00 ` Qu Wenruo
2017-01-11 3:01 ` Eric Sandeen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).