* Generic/389 xfs_io segfault on btrfs and ext4 @ 2017-01-11 2:08 Qu Wenruo 2017-01-11 2:40 ` Eric Sandeen 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Qu Wenruo @ 2017-01-11 2:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eryu Guan, agruenba, btrfs, fstests, linux-xfs Hi, Andreas and Eryu, I found test case generic/389 fails on btrfs and ext4, and it fails with xfs_io segfault. So it seems to be a bug in xfsprogs, but I'm already using the latest release from Fedora. Is this a known bug? Thanks, Qu ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Generic/389 xfs_io segfault on btrfs and ext4 2017-01-11 2:08 Generic/389 xfs_io segfault on btrfs and ext4 Qu Wenruo @ 2017-01-11 2:40 ` Eric Sandeen 2017-01-11 2:45 ` Qu Wenruo 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Eric Sandeen @ 2017-01-11 2:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Qu Wenruo, Eryu Guan, agruenba, btrfs, fstests, linux-xfs On 1/10/17 8:08 PM, Qu Wenruo wrote: > Hi, Andreas and Eryu, > > I found test case generic/389 fails on btrfs and ext4, and it fails with xfs_io segfault. Details, please? Works ok here: # ./check generic/389 FSTYP -- ext4 PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 bp-05 4.9.0-rc1+ MKFS_OPTIONS -- /dev/sdb2 MOUNT_OPTIONS -- -o acl,user_xattr -o context=system_u:object_r:nfs_t:s0 /dev/sdb2 /mnt/scratch generic/389 1s ... 1s Ran: generic/389 Passed all 1 tests # rpm -q xfsprogs xfsprogs-4.9.0-1.el6.x86_64 What version of kernel and xfsprogs were you testing, and what was the segfault? Thanks, -Eric > So it seems to be a bug in xfsprogs, but I'm already using the latest release from Fedora. > > Is this a known bug? > > Thanks, > Qu > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Generic/389 xfs_io segfault on btrfs and ext4 2017-01-11 2:40 ` Eric Sandeen @ 2017-01-11 2:45 ` Qu Wenruo 2017-01-11 2:53 ` Eric Sandeen 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Qu Wenruo @ 2017-01-11 2:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eric Sandeen, Eryu Guan, agruenba, btrfs, fstests, linux-xfs At 01/11/2017 10:40 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote: > On 1/10/17 8:08 PM, Qu Wenruo wrote: >> Hi, Andreas and Eryu, >> >> I found test case generic/389 fails on btrfs and ext4, and it fails with xfs_io segfault. > > Details, please? > > Works ok here: > > # ./check generic/389 > FSTYP -- ext4 > PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 bp-05 4.9.0-rc1+ > MKFS_OPTIONS -- /dev/sdb2 > MOUNT_OPTIONS -- -o acl,user_xattr -o context=system_u:object_r:nfs_t:s0 /dev/sdb2 /mnt/scratch > > generic/389 1s ... 1s > Ran: generic/389 > Passed all 1 tests > > # rpm -q xfsprogs > xfsprogs-4.9.0-1.el6.x86_64 OK, that's the problem. My repo only provides old xfsprogs, which xfsprogs-4.5.0-2.fc25.x86_64. > > What version of kernel and xfsprogs were you testing, and what was the segfault? Kernel is mainline v4.10-rc1. No debuginfo installed, so no backtrace, but since there is so many So the problem is the old xfsprogs, I'll update or compile xfsprogs. Thanks for your kind info. Thanks, Qu > > Thanks, > -Eric > >> So it seems to be a bug in xfsprogs, but I'm already using the latest release from Fedora. >> >> Is this a known bug? >> >> Thanks, >> Qu >> >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Generic/389 xfs_io segfault on btrfs and ext4 2017-01-11 2:45 ` Qu Wenruo @ 2017-01-11 2:53 ` Eric Sandeen 2017-01-11 3:00 ` Qu Wenruo 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Eric Sandeen @ 2017-01-11 2:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Qu Wenruo, Eric Sandeen, Eryu Guan, agruenba, btrfs, fstests, linux-xfs On 1/10/17 8:45 PM, Qu Wenruo wrote: > > > At 01/11/2017 10:40 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote: ... >> What version of kernel and xfsprogs were you testing, and what was the segfault? > > Kernel is mainline v4.10-rc1. > No debuginfo installed, so no backtrace, but since there is so many > > So the problem is the old xfsprogs, I'll update or compile xfsprogs. > Thanks for your kind info. Just FWIW, I always have latest xfsprogs in rawhide, but I don't usually push to other fedoras. It should be easy to grab https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/xfsprogs/4.9.0/1.fc26/src/xfsprogs-4.9.0-1.fc26.src.rpm and rebuild & install. -Eric ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Generic/389 xfs_io segfault on btrfs and ext4 2017-01-11 2:53 ` Eric Sandeen @ 2017-01-11 3:00 ` Qu Wenruo 2017-01-11 3:01 ` Eric Sandeen 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Qu Wenruo @ 2017-01-11 3:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eric Sandeen, Eric Sandeen, Eryu Guan, agruenba, btrfs, fstests, linux-xfs At 01/11/2017 10:53 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote: > On 1/10/17 8:45 PM, Qu Wenruo wrote: >> >> >> At 01/11/2017 10:40 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote: > > ... > >>> What version of kernel and xfsprogs were you testing, and what was the segfault? >> >> Kernel is mainline v4.10-rc1. >> No debuginfo installed, so no backtrace, but since there is so many >> >> So the problem is the old xfsprogs, I'll update or compile xfsprogs. >> Thanks for your kind info. > > Just FWIW, I always have latest xfsprogs in rawhide, but I don't usually push > to other fedoras. > > It should be easy to grab > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/xfsprogs/4.9.0/1.fc26/src/xfsprogs-4.9.0-1.fc26.src.rpm > and rebuild & install. Thanks for the info. I have already compiled latest version and it works perfectly. BTW, just wonder if or when Fedora will do rolling release, which should avoid such problem. Thanks, Qu > > -Eric > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Generic/389 xfs_io segfault on btrfs and ext4 2017-01-11 3:00 ` Qu Wenruo @ 2017-01-11 3:01 ` Eric Sandeen 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Eric Sandeen @ 2017-01-11 3:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Qu Wenruo, Eric Sandeen, Eryu Guan, agruenba, btrfs, fstests, linux-xfs On 1/10/17 9:00 PM, Qu Wenruo wrote: > > > At 01/11/2017 10:53 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> On 1/10/17 8:45 PM, Qu Wenruo wrote: >>> >>> >>> At 01/11/2017 10:40 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> >> ... >> >>>> What version of kernel and xfsprogs were you testing, and what was the segfault? >>> >>> Kernel is mainline v4.10-rc1. >>> No debuginfo installed, so no backtrace, but since there is so many >>> >>> So the problem is the old xfsprogs, I'll update or compile xfsprogs. >>> Thanks for your kind info. >> >> Just FWIW, I always have latest xfsprogs in rawhide, but I don't usually push >> to other fedoras. >> >> It should be easy to grab >> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/xfsprogs/4.9.0/1.fc26/src/xfsprogs-4.9.0-1.fc26.src.rpm >> and rebuild & install. > > Thanks for the info. > > I have already compiled latest version and it works perfectly. > > BTW, just wonder if or when Fedora will do rolling release, which should avoid such problem. You can always run rawhide. :) -Eric ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-01-11 3:01 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2017-01-11 2:08 Generic/389 xfs_io segfault on btrfs and ext4 Qu Wenruo 2017-01-11 2:40 ` Eric Sandeen 2017-01-11 2:45 ` Qu Wenruo 2017-01-11 2:53 ` Eric Sandeen 2017-01-11 3:00 ` Qu Wenruo 2017-01-11 3:01 ` Eric Sandeen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).